“健康丝绸之路”构建的“政府—社会”复合路径

doi:10.3785/j.issn.1008-942X.CN33-6000/C.2020.12.073

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (1)

Download: PDF (916 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract During his visit to Uzbekistan in 2016, Xi Jinping proposed the Health Silk Road initiative. The unanticipated COVID-19 outbreak in 2020 made the construction of a Health Silk Road more pressing. Researches on this initiative, however, are currently confined to the government level, little done by academics. Few studies that have been carried out are either from a single particular perspective or based on a certain region, lacking academic and theoretical findings. Therefore, by drawing on the social movement theory, this study attempts to explore a “government-society” complex approach to analyze the construction of the Health Silk Road. Distinct from the single bottom-up development style of the social movement theory, but a process integrating the top-down government with the bottom-up society, this complex approach deals with three different relationships between a government and other governments, between a society and other societies, and between a government and other societies. It is a theoretical and practical approach of interaction between government and society, which is reflected in the synergy and mutual influence of the two forces. Although the Health Silk Road discussed in this study centers on transnational government-to-government and society-to-society cooperation and interaction, and differs somewhat from the traditional social movement theory style, it can still be framed under the three perspectives of the theory. First, the cross-border spread of COVID-19 has exposed the serious deficiencies of the current global public health governance system, as neither international organizations at the governmental level, nor health care institutions at the social level, nor people in various countries can meet the needs of pandemic prevention and control or cope with the threat alone. Current international health cooperation is in urgent need of a new and complementary initiative or mechanism. Partnering with the World Health Organization (WHO), the Health Silk Road has some unique advantages, thanks to the rich experience accumulated through the Sino-Japan-Korea cooperation model in combating the pandemic. Second, further promotion of the initiative requires a joint mobilization of the human, material, organizational and cultural resources in countries along the Belt and Road, with an aim to form complementary strengths and facilitate resource sharing. This calls for collaboration among governments and societies, as well as integration of resources based on resource distribution of the B&R countries, which will serve as a solid material foundation for the construction of the Health Silk Road. Meanwhile, a sound health discourse system can also be achieved by advocating and advancing the concept of a “Community of Common Health for Mankind”. The process of people-to-people bond, by means of discourse and psychological resonance, will enable the Health Silk Road to turn into a program widely accepted and recognized by the involving countries, so as to speed up the establishment of a motivational framing. In addition, this study examines the future planning and deployment of the Health Silk Road. As an exploratory study, this paper aims at inspiring more academic and theoretical research and expediting the transformation of the initiative from a political concept into an academic one. In the long run, it is hoped that the construction of the Health Silk Road will lead to joint efforts by the international community to address the global public health crisis, effectively strengthen global health cooperation, and reshape and improve the order of global public health governance in a post-pandemic era.

Key words： a “government-society” complex approach the Health Silk Road social movement theory China’s diplomacy

Received: 07 December 2020

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	Zeng Xianghong
	Luo Jin

TRENDMD:

Cite this article:

Zeng Xianghong,Luo Jin. The Construction of the Health Silk Road: Based on a “Government-Society” Complex Approach[J]. JOURNAL OF ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY, 2022, 52(3): 5-21.

URL:

https://www.zjujournals.com/soc/EN/10.3785/j.issn.1008-942X.CN33-6000/C.2020.12.073 OR https://www.zjujournals.com/soc/EN/Y2022/V52/I3/5

赵磊：《以国际合作打造人类卫生健康共同体》，《人民日报》2020年4月17日，第2版。2 习近平：《习近平在乌兹别克斯坦最高会议立法院的演讲（全文）》，2016年6月23日，http：//www.xinhuanet.com/world/2016-06/23/c_1119094900.htm，2020年6月8日。3 和音：《“健康丝绸之路”为生命护航》，《人民日报》2020年3月24日，第3版。4 郭培阳：《云南构建“健康丝绸之路”的建议》，《社会主义论坛》2019年第4期，第51页。5 申钟秀：《美国智库对“健康丝绸之路”倡议的认知及启示》，《情报杂志》2020年第11期，第47-53，24页。6 Zirakzadeh C. E.， Social Movements in Politics： A Comparative Study （Expanded Edition）， New York： Palgrave Macmillan， 2006.7 Tarrow S.， “The Europeanisation of conflict： reflections from a social movement perspective，” West European Politics， Vol. 18， No. 2 （1995）， pp. 223-251.8 McCarthy J. D. & Zald M. N.， “Resource mobilization and social movements： a partial theory，” American Journal of Sociology， Vol. 82， No. 6 （1977）， pp. 1212-1241.9 Diani M.， “Networks and social movements： a research programme，” in Diani M. & McAdam D. （eds.）， Social Movements and Networks： Relational Approaches to Collective Action， New York： Oxford University Press， 2003， pp. 299-318.10 陆海燕：《新社会运动与当代西方政治变革》，武汉：武汉大学出版社，2011年。11 McCauley D.， “Bottom-up Europeanization exposed： social movement theory and non-state actors in France，” Journal of Common Market Studies， Vol. 49， No. 5 （2011）， pp. 1019-1042.12 赵鼎新：《社会与政治运动讲义》，北京：社会科学文献出版社，2006年。13 McAdam D.， McCarthy J. D. & Zald M. N. （eds.）， Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements： Political Opportunities， Mobilizing Structures， and Cultural Framings， Cambridge： Cambridge University Press， 1996.14 曾向红：《恐怖主义的整合性治理——基于社会运动理论的视角》，《世界经济与政治》2017年第1期，第 74-97页。15 Kitschelt H. P.， “Political opportunity structures and political protest： anti-nuclear movements in four democracies，” British Journal of Political Science， Vol. 16， No. 1 （1986）， pp. 57-85.16 McAdam D.， “Political opportunity： conceptual origins， current problems， future direction，” in McAdam D.，McCarthy J. D. & Zald M. N. （eds.）， Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements： Political Opportunities， Mobilizing Structures， and Cultural Framings， Cambridge： Cambridge University， 1996， pp. 23-40.17 汤蓓：《PHEIC机制与世界卫生组织的角色演进》，《世界经济与政治》2020年第3期，第44-61，156-157页。18 Kamradt-Scott A.， Managing Global Health Security： The World Health Organization and Disease Outbreak Control， London： Palgrave Macmillan， 2015.19 王明国：《人类卫生健康共同体的科学内涵、时代价值与构建路径》，《当代世界》2020年第7期，第34-40页。20 Gostin L. O.， Sridhar D. & Hougendobler D.， “The normative authority of the World Health Organization，” Public Health， Vol. 129， No. 7 （2015）， pp. 854-863.21 齐峰：《人类卫生健康共同体：理念、话语和行动》，《社会主义研究》2020年第4期，第119-126页。22 张宇燕、倪峰、杨伯江等：《新冠疫情与国际关系》，《世界经济与政治》2020年第4期，第4-26，155页。23 孙吉胜：《新冠肺炎疫情与全球治理变革》，《世界经济与政治》2020年第5期，第71-95，157-158页。24 Semenova Y.，Pivina L. & Khismetova Z. et al.， “Anticipating the need for healthcare resources following the escalation of the COVID-19 outbreak in the Republic of Kazakhstan，” Journal of Preventive Medicine & Public Health， Vol. 53， No. 6 （2020）， pp. 387-396.25 雷小华、刘肖华：《中国为“健康丝绸之路”作出新贡献》，《广西日报》2020年3月26日，第11版。26 胡鞍钢、李兆辰：《人类卫生健康共同体视域下的中国行动、中国倡议与中国方案》，《新疆师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2020年第5期，第54-63，2页。27 葛建华、马兰：《中日韩合作抗疫：构建卫生健康共同体》，《东北亚学刊》2020年第3期，第24-32页。28 阿达莱提·塔伊尔：《上海合作组织框架内的医疗卫生合作回顾与展望》，《欧亚经济》2019年第4期，第 105-124，128页。29 Cress D. M. & Snow D. A.， “Mobilization at the margins： resources， benefactors， and the viability of homeless social movement organizations，” American Sociological Review， Vol. 61， No. 6 （1996）， pp. 1089-1109.30 Edwards B. & McCarthy J. D.， “Resources and social movement mobilization，” in Snow D. A.， Soule S. A. & Kriesi H. （eds.）， The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements， Singapore： Blackwell Publishing， 2004， pp. 116-152.31 Benford R. D. & Snow D. A.， “Framing processes and social movements： an overview and assessment，” Annual Review of Sociology， Vol. 26 （2000）， pp. 611-639.32 Snow D. A.， Rochford E. B.， Jr. & Worden S. K. et al.， “Frame alignment processes， micromobilization， and movement participation，” American Sociological Review， Vol. 51， No. 4 （1986）， pp. 464-481.33 Snow D. A. & Benford R. D.， “Master frames and cycles of protest，” in Morris A. D. & Muller C. M. （eds.）， Frontiers in Social Movement Theory， New Haven and London： Yale University Press， 1992， pp. 133-155.34 Marco G. & Maria T. G.， “How civil society actors responded to the economic crisis： the interaction of material deprivation and perceptions of political opportunity structures，” Politics & Policy， Vol. 44， No. 3 （2016）， pp. 447-472.35 Kurzman C.， “Structural opportunity and perceived opportunity in Social-Movement theory： the Iranian Revolution of 1979，” American Sociological Review， Vol. 61， No. 1 （1996）， pp. 153-170.36 Nepstad S. E.， “The process of cognitive liberation： cultural synapses， links， and frame contradictions in the U.S.-Central America Peace Movement，” Sociological Inquiry， Vol. 67， No. 4 （1997）， pp. 470-487.37 McAdam D.， Political Process and the Development of Black Insurgency 1930-1970， Chicago： The University of Chicago Press， 1982.38 王帆、凌胜利主编：《人类命运共同体：全球治理的中国方案》，长沙：湖南人民出版社，2017年。39 陈娜、陈明富：《习近平构建人类卫生健康共同体倡议的内涵、逻辑与意义》，《桂海论丛》2020年第4期，第 25-28页。40 刘昆、刘建飞：《推动构建人类健康命运共同体》，《中国领导科学》2020年第2期，第25-29页。41 杨洁勉：《中国特色大国外交和话语权的使命与挑战》，《国际问题研究》2016年第5期，第18-30页。42 曾向红、李琳琳：《新冠疫情跨国扩散背景下的西方对华污名化》，《国际论坛》2020年第5期，第117-135页。43 孙吉胜：《新冠肺炎疫情下国际舆论的新特点与中国国际话语权建设》，《当代世界》2020年第10期，第4-10页。44 刘昌明、杨慧：《构建人类命运共同体：从外交话语到外交话语权》，《理论学刊》2019年第4期，第5-13页。45 王亚军：《民心相通为“一带一路”固本强基》，《行政管理改革》2019年第3期，第12-17页。46 张久安：《“民心相通”视角下的企业民间外交》，《公共外交季刊》2016年第3期，第32-37，123页。47 Guo M.， “Building the people-to-people bond in the Belt and Road Initiative： a case study of digital visual communication，” Advances in Social Science， Education and Humanities Research， Vol. 157 （2017）， pp. 241-244.