|
|
|
| Innovation, Entrepreneurship, and the Rise and Decline of Capitalism: Joseph Schumpeter’s Theory of Social Evolution |
| Wang Changgang, Luo Weidong |
| School of Economics, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Joseph Schumpeter aimed at developing a coherent and unified theoretical system based on the essence and development of capitalism. The core of the system is his theory of innovation and entrepreneurship, and the auxiliary part is his theories of class, imperialism and many others. These features suggest that Schumpeter should be viewed as a social theorist across disciplines rather than merely an economist or sociologist. Schumpeter defined innovation, pioneering entrepreneurs and bank credit as the essential triad of capitalism. According to the changing significance and role of the triad, the whole capitalist history was divided into four phases: Early Capitalism, Mercantilist Capitalism, Intact Capitalism, and Trustified Capitalism. The origin of Western capitalism could go back to ancient Greek and Roman eras, when the credit was created. However, the dominant of society had not begun to transfer from feudal aristocracy class to capitalist class until the end of the 14th Century. Several institutions with capitalist characteristics such as joint-stock company and stock exchange had well developed at least in some commercial centers by the mid-16th Century. Mercantilist Capitalism spanned from the second half of the 16th Century to the end of the 18th Century. In this phase capitalism had still not gained dominance and was restricted by the feudal aristocracy, who usually used capitalism as the weapon for political struggles. Under these conditions, the prevailing economic policy was mercantilism, and the whole picture of capitalism could be summed up as “doing business with sword in hand”. From the end of the 18th Century, capitalism had actually become the shaping force of the whole society, and produced a strikingly different social pattern, the Intact Capitalism. This new pattern prevailed in the whole 19th Century. During this phase, most social development phenomena can be explained purely by the essential internal logic of capitalism, i.e. the process of creative destruction. The most distinctive result of this process is the business cycle. Correspondingly, the main features of policy in this phase were liberalism and pacifism. Hence this phase was also termed Competitive Capitalism. At the end of the 19th Century, capitalism entered the modern phase, Trustified Capitalism. The greatest economic transformation in this phase was the tendency toward industrial concentration and the emergence of large-scale trust. In policy and culture, this phase experienced a revival of protectionism and imperialism, and the reverse of previous positive attitude toward capitalism. In the light of the above transformation, the capitalist economic life would be bureaucratized, the entrepreneurs would be unnecessary, the institutional bases of capitalism would be undermined, and bourgeois families would disintegrate, and so on. All these imply that capitalism would be destroyed by itself and be substituted by socialism. This would be the ultimate destiny of capitalism. Schumpeter’s vision of social change has guided his analyses of capitalist development. Three important aspects of his vision are: the defining characteristic of social change is evolution instead of revolution; the basic dynamics of it is that every social pattern develops internally a tendency toward self-destruction; the basic form is that different spheres of society evolve asynchronously. Schumpeter’s insights and approaches contribute greatly to identifying correctly the current trend of capitalism.
|
|
Received: 13 October 2020
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
郎友兴： 《精英与民主：西方精英主义民主理论述评》，《浙江学刊》2003年第6期，第71-78页。2 [美］乔治·瑞泽尔： 《古典社会学理论》（第六版），王建民译，北京：世界图书出版公司，2014年。3 [美］约瑟夫·熊彼特： 《资本主义、社会主义与民主》，吴良健译，北京：商务印书馆，1999年。4 Sweezy P.， “Schumpeter on ‘imperialism and social classes’，” in Harris S.E. （ed.）， Schumpeter： Social Scientist, Cambridge， MA： Harvard University Press， 1951， pp. 119-124.5 Dahms H.， “Joseph A. Schumpeter，” in Ritzer G. & Stepnisky J. （eds.）， The Wiley-Blackwell Companion to Major Social Theorists， Malden： Wiley-Blackwell， 2011， pp. 448-468.6 Schumpeter J.， “Capitalism，” in Clemence R.V. （ed.）， Essays on Entrepreneurs， Innovations， Business Cycles and the Evolution of Capitalism， New Brunswick： Transaction Publishers， 1989， pp. 189-210.7 Schumpeter J.， Business Cycles： A Theoretical， Historical and Statistical Analysis of the Capitalist Process， New York： McGraw-Hill， 1939.8 [美］约瑟夫·熊彼特： 《经济发展理论》，何畏等译，北京：商务印书馆，1990年。9 [德］哈拉尔德·哈格曼： 《熊彼特论资本主义发展、创新及经济周期》，马媛媛译，《经济思想史评论》2010年第1期，第74-87，241页。10 [美］约瑟夫·熊彼德： 《资本主义经济学及其社会学》，理察·斯威德柏格编，蓝元骏译，台北：联经出版事业股份有限公司，2017年。11 Schumpeter J.， “The instability of capitalism，” The Economic Journal， Vol. 38， No. 151 （1928）， pp. 361-386.12 Ebner A.， “Schumpeterian entrepreneurship revisited： historical specificity and the phases of capitalist development，” Journal of the History of Economic Thought， Vol. 28， No. 3 （2006）， pp. 315-332.13 Rosenberg N.， “Joseph Schumpeter： radical economist，” in Rosenberg N. （ed.） Exploring the Black Box： Technology， Economics， and History， Cambridge： Cambridge University Press， 1994， pp. 47-61.14 [美］约瑟夫·熊彼特： 《经济分析史》（第一卷），朱泱等译，北京：商务印书馆，1991年。15 Swedberg R.， “Schumpeter’s vision of socioeconomics，” The Journal of Socio-Economics， Vol. 24， No. 4 （1995）， pp. 525-544.16 [美］小艾尔弗雷德·D.钱德勒： 《看得见的手：美国企业的管理革命》，重武译，北京：商务印书馆，1987年。17 Langlois R.， The Dynamics of Industrial Capitalism： Schumpeter， Chandler， and the New Economy， New York： Routledge， 2007.18 [加］霍华德、［澳］金： 《马克思主义经济学史（1883—1929）》，顾海良等译，北京：中央编译出版社，2014年。19 [德］于尔根·科卡： 《资本主义简史》，徐庆译，上海：文汇出版社，2017年。20 Osterhammel J.， “Varieties of social economics： Joseph A. Schumpeter and Max Weber，” in Mommsen W. & Osterhammel J. （eds.）， Max Weber and His Contemporaries， New York： Routledge， 2010， pp. 106-120.21 [德］马克思： 《资本论》（第一卷），中共中央编译局编译，北京：人民出版社，2004年。22 [德］马克斯·韦伯： 《经济行动与社会团体》，康乐、简惠美译，桂林：广西师范大学出版社，2004年。
|
|
|
|
2021, Vol. 51 
