如何打好环保政策“组合拳”？

doi:10.3785/j.issn.1008-942X.CN33-6000/C.2025.03.282

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (2)

Download: PDF (873 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract In order to synergize the reduction of pollution and carbon emissions, a series of environmental policy tools like “combination punches” have been implemented to stimulate companies for adopting low-carbon innovations in China. Little existing literature, however, has focused on this problem. The incentive effects of “three dimensions and six types” environmental policy tool combination, namely the regulatory dimension (punishment type, inspection type), the incentive dimension (honor type, preferential type), and the assistance dimension (guidance type, publicity type) on company adopting low-carbon innovations are analyzed in this paper from the perspective of configuration, selecting 380 polluting enterprises in Zhejiang Province as research samples and using a combination of NCA and fsQCA methods， grounded in the theoretical perspective of multiple institutional logics.The findings reveal that This study contributes to the literature in several ways: (1) It pioneers the combined application of NCA and fsQCA in this domain, enriching the methodological toolkit and jointly supporting the core argument for the importance of policy synergy through the lenses of necessity and sufficiency. (2) It integrates the multiple, co-opetitive institutional logics of deterrence, inducement, and assistance to construct a comprehensive analytical framework explaining the coupling effects of the environmental policy “combination punch”, offering a novel perspective for understanding the causal complexity behind corporate low-carbon innovation. (3) It exploratively utilizes sub-sample fsQCA analysis to delve into firm heterogeneity (technology level and size) as a boundary condition of configurational effects, clearly addressing the critical policy question of “which policy mix works best for whom”, thereby enhancing the practical guidance value of the research findings. The findings reveal that This study contributes to the literature in several ways: (1) It pioneers the combined application of NCA and fsQCA in this domain, enriching the methodological toolkit and jointly supporting the core argument for the importance of policy synergy through the lenses of necessity and sufficiency. (2) It integrates the multiple, co-opetitive institutional logics of deterrence, inducement, and assistance to construct a comprehensive analytical framework explaining the coupling effects of the environmental policy “combination punch”, offering a novel perspective for understanding the causal complexity behind corporate low-carbon innovation. (3) It exploratively utilizes sub-sample fsQCA analysis to delve into firm heterogeneity (technology level and size) as a boundary condition of configurational effects, clearly addressing the critical policy question of “which policy mix works best for whom”, thereby enhancing the practical guidance value of the research findings.

Key words： environmental policy low-carbon innovation environmental policy tool combination fsQCA

Received: 28 March 2025

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	Hu Yingde
	Yi Tiantian
	Han Hongyun

Cite this article:

Hu Yingde,Yi Tiantian,Han Hongyun. How to Implement "Combination Punches" of Environmental Policies Effectively?[J]. JOURNAL OF ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY, 2026, 56(5): 98-115.

URL:

https://www.zjujournals.com/soc/EN/10.3785/j.issn.1008-942X.CN33-6000/C.2025.03.282 OR https://www.zjujournals.com/soc/EN/Y2026/V56/I5/98

1 孙正林、卞晨、初钊鹏等：《政府监管视域下碳排放规制与低碳技术创新演化仿真研究》，《工业技术经济》2021年第12期，第103-112页。
2 Wang R.， Wijen F. & Heugens P. P.， “Government’s green grip： multifaceted state influence on corporate environmental actions in China，” Strategic Management Journal， Vol. 39， No. 2 （2018）， pp. 403-428.
3 Edmondson D. L.， Kern F. & Rogge K. S.， “The co-evolution of policy mixes and socio-technical systems： towards a conceptual framework of policy mix feedback in sustainability transitions，” Research Policy， Vol. 48， No. 10 （2019）， https：//doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.03.010.
4 Alexandra G.， Luana L. & Nils G.， “Fostering technological innovation systems through adaptive policy mixes： the case of the German bioeconomy，” Cleaner and Circular Bioeconomy， No. 12 （2025）， https：//doi.org/10.18452/35354.
5 Henning W. & O’Brien M.， “A policy mix for resource efficiency in the EU： key instruments， challenges and research needs，” Ecological Economics， No. 155 （2019）， pp. 59-69.
6 Neicud， “Evaluating the effects of an R&D policy mix of subsidies and tax credits，” Management and Economics Review， Vol. 4， No. 2 （2019）， pp. 1-13.
7 马文聪、叶阳平、陈修德等：《政策“组合拳”更有效吗？我国创新政策组合对企业高质量创新的影响效应及其作用机制》，《管理评论》2024年第3期，第60-73页。
8 Flanagan K.， Uyarra E. & Laranja M.， “Reconceptualising the ‘policy mix’ for innovation，” Research Policy， Vol. 40， No. 5 （2011）， pp. 702-713.
9 马文聪、叶阳平、陈修德：《创新政策组合：研究述评与未来展望》，《科技进步与对策》2020年第8期，第152-161页。
10 Montmartin B. & Herrera M.， “Internal and external effects of R&D subsidies and fiscal incentives： empirical evidence using spatial dynamic panel models，” Research Policy， Vol. 44， No. 5 （2015）， pp. 1065-1079.
11 寇明婷、魏建武、肖明等：《双管齐下是否更优？企业研发税收优惠政策组合一致性研究》，《管理评论》2022年第1期，第92-105页。
12 李晓丹、刘洋：《制度复杂理论研究进展及对中国管理研究的启示》，《管理学报》2015年第12期，第1741-1753页。
13 肖红军、阳镇：《多重制度逻辑下共益企业的成长：制度融合与响应战略》，《当代经济科学》2019年第3期，第1-12页。
14 Borras S. & Edquist C.， “The choice of innovation policy instruments，” Technological Forecasting and Social Change， Vol. 80， No. 8 （2013）， pp. 1513-1522.
15 Smith S. E. & Smith H.， Evaluating Economic Instruments for Environmental Policy， Paris： Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development （OECD）， 1997.
16 Kemp R. & Arundel A.， “Survey indicators for environmental innovation，” http：//hdl.handle.net/11250/226478， 2025-03-28.
17 司林波、金裕景、吴振其：《中韩环境政策工具比较》，《山东行政学院学报》2017年第1期，第20-26页。
18 吕丹阳：《基于助推理论的环保行为干预策略》，《四川环境》2024年第1期，第117-122页。
19 杜运周、刘秋辰、程建青：《什么样的营商环境生态产生城市高创业活跃度？——基于制度组态的分析》，《管理世界》2020年第9期，第141-155页。
20 Lin H.， Zeng S. X. & Ma H. Y. et al.， “Can political capital drive corporate green innovation？ lessons from China，” Journal of Cleaner Production， Vol. 64， No. 9 （2014）， pp. 63-72.
21 Campbell J. L.， “Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways？ an institutional theory of corporate social responsibility，” Academy of Management Review， Vol. 32， No. 3 （2007）， pp. 946-967.
22 徐宁、张阳、徐向艺：《高管声誉对国有企业高质量创新的驱动机制研究》，《科研管理》2024年第6期，第183-192页。
23 李晨光、张永安：《区域创新政策对企业创新效率影响的实证研究》，《科研管理》2014年第9期，第25-35页。
24 杨洋、魏江、罗来军：《谁在利用政府补贴进行创新？——所有制和要素市场扭曲的联合调节效应》，《管理世界》2015年第1期，第75-86页。
25 林枫、徐悦、张雄林：《环境政策工具对生态创新的影响：研究回顾及实践意义》，《科技进步与对策》2018年第14期，第152-160页。
26 李爽、王劲文：《低碳城市试点政策、居民低碳素养与企业绿色技术创新》，《中国人口·资源与环境》2023年第4期，第93-103页。
27 Greenwood R.， Diaz A. M. & Li S. X. et al.， “The multiplicity of institutional logics and the heterogeneity of organizational responses，” Organization Science， Vol. 21， No. 2 （2010）， pp. 521-539.
28 佚名：《中央“泼冷水”，零碳园区不是政绩秀，真高地要这样建！》，2025年8月4日，http：//www.iesplaza.com/article-16463-1.html，2025年10月10日。
29 Lopez J. M. R.， Sakhel A. & Busch T.， “Corporate investments and environmental regulation： the role of regulatory uncertainty， regulation-induced uncertainty and investment history，” European Management Journal， Vol. 35， No. 1 （2017）， pp. 91-101.
30 Ragin C. C. & Fiss P. C.， “Net effects analysis versus configurational analysis： an empirical demonstration，” in Ragin C. C.， Redesigning Social Inquiry： Fuzzy Sets and Beyond， Chicago： University Of Chicago Press， 2008， pp. 190-212.
31 杜运周、孙宁、刘秋辰：《运用混合方法发展和分析复杂中介模型——以营商环境促进创新活力，协同新质生产力和“就业优先”为例》，《管理世界》2024年第6期，第217-238页。
32 Fiss P. C.， “Building better causal theories： a fuzzy set approach to typologies in organization research，” Academy of Management Journal， Vol. 54， No. 2 （2011）， pp. 393-420.
33 Beom C. C.， Young J. K. & Nicholas S. V.， “The impact of public R&D subsidy on small firm productivity： evidence from Korean SMEs，” Small Business Economics， Vol. 48， No. 2 （2017）， pp. 345-360.
34 Fabrizia A.， Guarinib G. & Melicianic V.， “Green patents， regulatory policies and research network policies，” Research Policy， Vol. 46， No. 6 （2018）， pp. 1018-1031.
35 张樨樨、郝兴霖：《组态视域下员工数字化转型抗拒的诱发与缓释》，《科学学研究》2022年第11期，第1003-2053页。
36 黄钟仪、赵骅、许亚楠：《众创空间创新产出影响因素的协同作用研究——基于31个省市众创空间数据的模糊集定性比较分析》，《科研管理》2020年第5期，第21-31页。
37 徐佳、崔静波：《低碳城市和企业绿色技术创新》，《中国工业经济》2020年第12期，第178-197页。
38 William M. & Wang F.， “Economic policy uncertainty and industry innovation： cross country evidence，” The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance， Vol. 84 （2022）， pp. 208-228.
39 Comanor W. S.， “Market structure， product differentiation and industrial research，” Quarterly Journal of Economics， Vol. 81， No. 4 （1967）， pp. 639-657.
40 Lynch-Wood G. & Williamson D.， “The social licence as a form of regulation for small and medium enterprises，” Journal of Law and Society， Vol. 34， No. 3 （2007）， pp. 321-341.
41 Zeng J. H.， Liu S. Q. & Li J. W.， “Research on the relationship between multi-driven green innovation and corporate performance，” Journal of Industrial Technological Economics， No. 39 （2020）， pp. 13-22.
42 杜运周、贾良定：《组态视角与定性比较分析（QCA）：管理学研究的一条新道路》，《管理世界》2017年第6期，第155-167页。