浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版)
 
   2025年6月23日 星期一   首页 |  期刊介绍 |  编委会 |  投稿指南 |  信息服务 |  期刊订阅 |  联系我们 |  预印本过刊 |  浙江省高校学报研究会栏目 |  留言板 |  English Version
浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版)  2021, Vol. 51 Issue (4): 36-49    DOI: 10.3785/j.issn.1008-942X.CN33-6000/C.2020.10.151
主题栏目:新出文献与中古文学研究 最新目录| 下期目录| 过刊浏览| 高级检索 |
从“史笔”到“文笔”
林家骊, 何玛丽
浙江树人大学 人文与外国语学院,浙江 杭州 312028
From Historical Writing to Literary Writing: The Literary Evolution of the Epitaph Before Tang Dynasty
Lin Jiali, He Mali
College of Humanities and Foreign Languages, Zhejiang Shuren University, Hangzhou 312028, China

全文: PDF (964 KB)   RICH HTML
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 墓碑文是中国古代文人重要的应用类文体之一,自两汉以来不断发展,其稳定而长久的创作实践蕴藏了重要的文学价值,尤其是发展的前期,是厘清其文学化进程的重要阶段。两汉时期,碑在物质意义的基础上确立了文体意义,并在史传的文体渗透下确立了前传后铭的体制结构,呈现出明显的史笔倾向。自建安末曹操禁碑政策重新确立墓碑刊立的官方权威后,碑文渐渐失去了两汉时期的补史功能,门阀制度下的社会文化也迫使墓碑文放弃了实录属性,转向对形式美的追求,并逐渐形成了“文”的自觉。墓碑文于两晋南北朝时期呈现出独立的篇章布局、工整的程式结构与骈俪的语言特征,这一转型揭示了碑文从两汉“史笔”到南北朝“文笔”的文学化进程。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入我的书架
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
林家骊
何玛丽
关键词 墓碑文唐前史笔文笔文学性文学嬗变    
Abstract:The epitaph is one of the important practical styles of ancient Chinese literati. From the prosperity in the Han Dynasty to the present, the epitaph has been handed down from generation to generation and the tradition never broke off. The practice has proved its important role and value in ancient literati and cultural life. Owing to its biographical attributes similar to history, its rich historical data value has been paid attention to by historians. However, the study of its literary value, which has lasted for thousands of years, is deficient. Now we find some new contents of the epitaphs in Printed Japanese Hongren Edition of Wenguan Cilin, including three in the Eastern Jin Dynasty, namely “Epitaph of Jiangzhou’s Governor Yu Bing”, “Epitaph of Jiangzhou’s Governor Yu Yi” and “Epitaph of Xuzhou’s Governor Wang Tanzhi”, one in the Southern Dynasties, namely “Epitaph of Yingzhou’s Governor Xiao Zizhao”, two in the Northern Dynasties, namely “Epitaph of Yanzhou’s Governor Hu Yan” and “Epitaph of Zheng Nan General He An”. The above epitaphs are all in complete chapters and the structure is excellent. Among them the objects of description were all important officials of the state. The authors were all famous literati of their time, such as Sun Chuo, Fu Tao, Xiao Yi and Wei Shou. They provide precious materials for the literary study of epitaphs in the Wei, Jin, Southern and Northern Dynasties. Unfortunately, they have not been systematically sorted out.In the Han Dynasty, the stylistic significance of the epitaph was gradually established in its continuous practice. The diversified stylistic expressions which originated from the material meaning of “stone” gradually evolved into an independent stylistic connotation. The epitaph, which is represented by biography, became a typical representative. The expansion of the narrative needs of the epitaph in the Han Dynasty accelerated the creation of the preface to the epitaph, thus established the system structure of the biography before and the eulogy after. The stylistic infiltration from historical biography also gave the epitaph of this period a historical consciousness of “Mingde”, a historical content of “Shihe” and a historical language of “Yanzhi”, namely the characteristics of “historical writing”.In the Wei, Jin, Southern and Northern Dynasties, Emperor Wu of the Wei regained official authority over the epitaph with a policy to ban engraving. The driving force for the creation of epitaph changed from “describing one’s life to highlighting morality” in the Han Dynasty to “pile up one’s position to display the great honor” in the Wei, Jin, Southern and Northern Dynasties, thus losing the consciousness of history. The great cultural change from the scholar society to the aristocracy society restrained the right of the creator to speak and the core sense of history was lost. At the same time, the wave of literary consciousness swept into the creation of epitaphs. The professionalization and formal beauty of literary creation constrained the free expression of the creators. The creation of epitaphs completed the transformation from “historical writing” to “literary writing” in the stylization process. Specifically, first, the epitaph started to have an independent layout. The emergence and solidification of the discussion chapter indicated that the epitaph was no longer a loose narrative collection but an independent article with a central idea. Second, the epitaph gained a more literary structural formula. The structural technique of writing section by section endowed the epitaph with a controllable length and a reusable paragraph. Third, its metrical pattern and parallel structure gave the epitaph a more graceful linguistic style, which also led to the weakening of its narrative function but enriched literariness.
Key wordsepitaph    Pre-Tang Period    historical writing    literary writing    literariness    literary evolution   
收稿日期: 2020-10-15     
基金资助:国家社会科学基金重点项目(16AZW005)
作者简介: 林家骊(https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4260-2697),男,浙江树人大学人文与外国语学院教授,文学博士,主要从事周秦汉魏晋南北朝文学研究;何玛丽(https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0458-0183),女,浙江树人大学人文与外国语学院讲师,文学博士,主要从事周秦汉魏晋南北朝文学研;
引用本文:   
林家骊, 何玛丽. 从“史笔”到“文笔”[J]. 浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2021, 51(4): 36-49. Lin Jiali, He Mali. From Historical Writing to Literary Writing: The Literary Evolution of the Epitaph Before Tang Dynasty. JOURNAL OF ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY, 2021, 51(4): 36-49.
链接本文:  
https://www.zjujournals.com/soc/CN/10.3785/j.issn.1008-942X.CN33-6000/C.2020.10.151     或     https://www.zjujournals.com/soc/CN/Y2021/V51/I4/36
发表一流的成果,传播一流的发现,提供一流的新知

浙ICP备14002560号-5
版权所有 © 2009 浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版)    浙ICP备05074421号
地址:杭州市天目山路148号 邮编:310028 电话:0571-88273210 88925616 E-mail:zdxb_w@zju.edu.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发  技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn