浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版)
 
   2025年6月9日 星期一   首页 |  期刊介绍 |  编委会 |  投稿指南 |  信息服务 |  期刊订阅 |  联系我们 |  预印本过刊 |  浙江省高校学报研究会栏目 |  留言板 |  English Version
浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版)  2021, Vol. 51 Issue (3): 153-165    DOI:
主题栏目:汉语史与汉文化圈语言文字研究 最新目录| 下期目录| 过刊浏览| 高级检索 |
汉语史视角下的《淮南子》校释新证
边田钢
浙江大学 中国语言文学系,浙江 杭州 310058
New Proof of Collation and Interpretation of Huainanzi from the Perspective of Character, Word Meaning and Word Relationship in the Early Western Han Dynasty
Bian Tiangang
Department of Chinese Language and Literature, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China

全文: PDF (1120 KB)   RICH HTML
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 《淮南子》中的部分校释问题存有争议或向无善解,而立足于西汉前期的汉语实际,常会有新的突破。部分校勘问题只有通过西汉前期的隶变字形才可以圆满地解释其形讹路径。在古籍校释中应进一步贯彻汉语史眼光,从西汉词义、字词关系的实际出发,才能更加理性地评价前人争议之是非,并得出更具说服力的新说。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入我的书架
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
Abstract:Some of the problems of collation and interpretation in Huainanzi (《淮南子》) are controversial or have no good solutions. Based on the actual Chinese language in the early Western Han Dynasty, there are often new breakthroughs. Firstly, part of the collation problem can only be explained satisfactorily through the form of Libian (隶变) characters in the early Western Han Dynasty. For example: (1) It is most direct and credible that “德” character was wrongly formed into “位” due to its Zhangcao (章草) character . In the Tianwen chapter of Huainanzi, the “位” in “爵有位” is a mistake of “德”. (2) In the Tianxia chapter of Huainanzi, “云臺” is a mistake of “云夢”. In the Western Han Dynasty, “夢” can be written as , easily to be misidentified as “臺”. According to the characteristics of the text configuration in different periods, it can be inferred that the occurrence of text errors was no later than the end of the Western Han Dynasty. Secondly, in the collation and interpretation of ancient books, we should further implement the perspectives on the history of Chinese language development, and proceed from the actual meaning and relationship of words in the Western Han Dynasty to rationally evaluate the disputes of the predecessors and draw more convincing new theories. For example: (1) In Zhushu chapter of Huainanzi, “害” is actually a mistake of “容”, and in this sentence it should mean “set”. “Set” is a very commonly used meaning of “容” in the Han Dynasty and before. (2) In Taizu chapter of Huainanzi, the “脩” should be a mistake of “循”. “循” and “揗” are different glyph forms that represent “caress” in the Han Dynasty and before.
收稿日期: 2021-01-19     
基金资助:教育部人文社科重点研究基地重大项目之子项目(19JJD740006);国家社科基金后期资助项目(17FYY002);国家社科基金重大项目 (17ZDA308,18ZDA296)
作者简介: 边田钢(https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7161-956X),男,浙江大学中国语言文学系特聘研究员,文学博士,主要从事古文字与上古音结合研;
引用本文:   
边田钢. 汉语史视角下的《淮南子》校释新证[J]. 浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2021, 51(3): 153-165. Bian Tiangang. New Proof of Collation and Interpretation of Huainanzi from the Perspective of Character, Word Meaning and Word Relationship in the Early Western Han Dynasty. JOURNAL OF ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY, 2021, 51(3): 153-165.
链接本文:  
https://www.zjujournals.com/soc/CN/     或     https://www.zjujournals.com/soc/CN/Y2021/V51/I3/153
发表一流的成果,传播一流的发现,提供一流的新知

浙ICP备14002560号-5
版权所有 © 2009 浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版)    浙ICP备05074421号
地址:杭州市天目山路148号 邮编:310028 电话:0571-88273210 88925616 E-mail:zdxb_w@zju.edu.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发  技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn