Abstract：Recently, crimes handled only upon complaint have attracted considerable scholarly attention, resulting in extensive research findings. Their traditional forms have largely faded from historical memory and remain insufficiently explored. However, investigating the traditional crimes handled only upon complaint is still necessary, as it can help us reexamine, fully understand, and even improve today’s legislation on such crimes from a historical perspective.The systematic establishment of crimes handled only upon complaint in traditional Chinese law traces back to the Code of the Tang Dynasty. Successive dynasties later adopted and revised these provisions. All traditional crimes handled only upon complaint were minor crimes occurring among relatives. Except for the crime of a husband beating his wife or concubine, where the wife or concubine could initiate a complaint, in other crimes handled only upon complaint, the right to file a complaint belonged to the senior family members, reflecting the traditional law’s emphasis on maintaining hierarchical distinctions. In traditional law, relatives generally lacked the right to report or lodge complaints against each other. The laws of “concealment among family relatives”, “voluntary surrender”, and “the crime of denouncing a superior relative” together established a system forbidding private prosecutions and denunciations between relatives. The central issue is whether the self-surrender rules, which grant mitigation or immunity to relatives who report crimes, apply to intra-family offenses. This question sparked considerable debate among Ming and Qing legal scholars. Wang Kentang and Xue Yunsheng believed that the exemption or reduction of punishment under the law of voluntary surrender for relatives who report crimes included intra-family crimes, while Lei Menglin and Shen Zhiqi held the opposite view. Upon analyzing the arguments of both sides, Lei and Shen’s reasoning proves more convincing.Due to differing understandings of whether the exemption or reduction of punishment under the law of voluntary surrender for relatives who report crimes includes intra-family crimes, Ming and Qing jurists also reached widely divergent interpretations on the legislative intent of crimes handled only upon complaint. Wang Kentang believed that “private accusation” conferred a right on family members to lodge criminal complaints, thus excluding the possibility of immunity based on voluntary surrender. Shen Zhiqi, however, argued that “private accusation” was primarily intended to preserve familial bonds. A careful review of the arguments presented by the two jurists reveals that Wang’s theory is largely flawed. According to the provisions of the separate crime provision law, once a specific crime committed between family members is separately established as a criminal offense, the principle of concealed crimes becomes invalid. Any violations will be adjudicated in accordance with the relevant provisions of the applicable provisions of the existing law. Therefore, the “private accusation” system did not grant family members the right to lodge accusations. In traditional societies, where the family and the state were structured on the same model, crimes handled only upon complaint acted as a mechanism by which the state transferred part of its governing authority to the family, so as to better protect ethical and familial bonds.During the late Qing reforms, the 1907 Draft Great Qing Criminal Code, partially influenced by the Japanese Criminal Code, incorporated provisions for crimes handled only upon complaint. Influenced heavily by the theory of legal interests, these reformed provisions deviated markedly from their traditional counterparts. Nonetheless, remnants of traditional thought persisted, as the late Qing legislation on crimes handled only upon complaint continued to emphasize the protection of family ethics. It follows that, under the legal interest theory, morals or ethics are generally not treated as protected objects in criminal law, as the legal interests safeguarded by criminal law should align with contemporary social values. If familial ethics remain a value upheld by that society, then criminal law should also provide protection for it. At present, family ethics remains an important issue in China’s legal framework. The Constitution explicitly recognizes the family as a fundamental value in its provisions. In this context, it is appropriate to treat family ethics as a legal interest protected by China’s criminal law. Defining family-related crimes as private offenses will help resolve conflicts, mend family ties, and prevent criminal law from undermining family ethics.
吴杰. 传统亲告罪的立法解析及时代蜕变[J]. 浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2026, 56(7): 82-97.
Wu Jie. Legislative Analysis and Transformation of Traditional Crimes Handled Only upon Complaint. JOURNAL OF ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY, 2026, 56(7): 82-97.
2026, Vol. 56 
