浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版)
 
   2025年6月7日 星期六   首页 |  期刊介绍 |  编委会 |  投稿指南 |  信息服务 |  期刊订阅 |  联系我们 |  预印本过刊 |  浙江省高校学报研究会栏目 |  留言板 |  English Version
浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版)  2024, Vol. 54 Issue (12): 81-92    DOI: 10.3785/j.issn.1008-942X.CN33-6000/C.2024.11.111
□ 法学研究 最新目录| 下期目录| 过刊浏览| 高级检索 |
“留白”之得失:对中华法系私法特征的思考
王帅一1,2
1.中国社会科学院大学 法学院,北京 102488
2.中国社会科学院 法学研究所,北京 100720
Gains and Losses of “Blank Spaces”: Reflections on the Characteristics of Private Law in the Chinese Legal Tradition
Wang Shuaiyi1,2
1.Law School, University of Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, Beijing 102488, China
2.Institute of Law, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, Beijing 100720, China

全文: PDF (738 KB)   RICH HTML
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 相比中华法系所呈现的发达的律令体系和悠久的礼法体系而言,私法与私权在这一系统内并未得到彰显。此种私法留白式的设计固然是受儒家思想深刻影响的中国文化在当时历史文化背景下的有意为之。在以刑治为中心的法观念占主导的时代,留白的方式可以给予权利以自由的表达,充分尊重权利主体的意思自治,但也存在着权利保护方面的缺陷。中华法系中私法表现出的自由与自治不是国家成文法确认的成果,而是从意识形态到治理政策放任的结果。在创造性转化与创新性发展中华传统文化时,需要发现中华法系这一私法留白特征的优势与不足,应以更加积极的姿态比较历史文化,才能为在建设中华民族现代文明背景下发展中华法系作出贡献。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入我的书架
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
王帅一
关键词 中华法系律令礼法私法意思自治权利保护    
Abstract:By examining the blank space characteristic of private law in the Chinese legal tradition, this article analyzes the unique status, historical background, manifestations, and developmental significance of private law within the system. It explores the reasons for the formation of the blank space in Chinese private law and its dual nature. Furthermore, it emphasizes the importance of inheriting and innovating the features of Chinese private law during modernization and envisions its value and mission in constructing a modern Chinese civilization.The concept of the Chinese legal system is not an inherent term within China’s traditional governance framework. Instead, it emerged in the early 20th century within the context of modern comparative law. Its primary features include a system based on laws and decrees, supplemented by rituals and customs, creating a traditional legal system centered on criminal law enforcement. The formation and development of the Chinese legal system reflect not only the influence of Chinese culture on legal frameworks but also the recognition and adoption of Chinese legal systems by East Asian countries.The legal system of the Chinese tradition prominently emphasizes public law, with criminal law at its core to embody state authority. In contrast, private law exhibits significant ambiguity and the characteristic of “blank spaces”. These “blank spaces” are not merely gaps in the law but represent a unique cultural approach to rights and obligations: Confucian ethical principles (li) served as a critical foundation for regulating individual and social behavior, coexisting with formal legal decrees to shape the overall framework of the Chinese legal system.The blank space in private law was profoundly influenced by Confucian culture. Confucianism prioritizes moral persuasion and social harmony, favoring the resolution of disputes through ethics and customs while minimizing legal intervention. This approach fostered a judicial tradition that prioritized autonomy of will and local customs, resulting in limited statutory provisions regarding private rights. This model reflects traditional China’s distinctive understanding of the law’s function and social needs.The characteristic of blank space in private law within the Chinese legal tradition had certain advantages in traditional times and demonstrated a form of modernity. The blank space in Chinese private law endowed subjects with significant freedom, highlighting the autonomy of will in transactions and social interactions. Key aspects include: Freedom of private contracts: private law largely relied on customary law and spontaneous rules, with minimal interference from state power. Judicial flexibility: traditional judicial practices protected numerous rights by resolving specific disputes, reflecting a flexible application of laws. This freedom and autonomy gave the Chinese legal tradition the embryonic spirit of modern legal governance while providing an essential perspective on the operation of laws in traditional society.However, the blank space in private law also presented limitations, primarily reflected in the uncertainty of rights protection. Key issues include: (1) Insufficient legislative guarantees: The lack of explicit provisions for private rights in statutory law led to reliance on judicial practices in individual cases, which proved unstable during regime changes or social upheavals. (2) Weak rights awareness: Confucianism’s emphasis on ritual humility and compromise diluted the active pursuit of individual rights. This permissive legal approach, achieved at the expense of freedom, adversely affected the stability and continuity of private law, particularly during periods of economic development and social transformation.The private law characteristics of the Chinese legal tradition reflect a unique interplay of culture and history. Its openness and adaptability allowed it to evolve into a coherent system over a long period. When studying the Chinese legal tradition, one should combine comparative legal perspectives with historical experience and modern needs, respect the tradition of freedom and autonomy in Chinese private law, and draw from the clarity and stability of rights protection in Western legal systems.The reconstruction of the Chinese legal system should embody openness and inclusiveness to respond to modern legal demands. In the context of globalization, this effort is not only a continuation of traditional culture but also a contribution to contemporary legal civilization. By drawing wisdom from culture, integrating the spirit of freedom in the Chinese legal system with modern legal governance concepts, and providing more definite legal protections for private rights, it will enhance cultural centripetal force and engage in dialogue and fusion with other legal systems. This will revitalize the Chinese legal system in a new era.The blank space characteristic of private law in the Chinese legal tradition demonstrates the spirit of freedom and autonomy in traditional legal systems while exposing the shortcomings of inadequate rights protection. The article argues that researches on the Chinese legal tradition in modern construction should be rooted in history while focusing on the future. Through creative transformation of traditional culture, the core spirit of autonomy of will in private law should be fully inherited and developed during the modernization of the legal system. By drawing on global legal traditions, the Chinese legal system can achieve a balance of openness, inclusiveness, and modernity at a new historical stage, forming distinctive features of private law with Chinese characteristics and contributing unique wisdom and experience to global legal governance.
Key wordsChinese legal system    laws and decrees    rituals and laws    private law    autonomy of will    protection of rights   
收稿日期: 2024-11-11     
基金资助:中国社会科学院研究阐释中华民族现代文明重大创新项目(2023YZD053)
作者简介: 王帅一(https://orcid.org/0009-0003-6846-5023),男,中国社会科学院大学法学院副教授、中国社会科学院法学研究所副研究员,法学博士,主要从事中国法律史研究;
引用本文:   
王帅一. “留白”之得失:对中华法系私法特征的思考[J]. 浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2024, 54(12): 81-92. Wang Shuaiyi. Gains and Losses of “Blank Spaces”: Reflections on the Characteristics of Private Law in the Chinese Legal Tradition. JOURNAL OF ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY, 2024, 54(12): 81-92.
链接本文:  
https://www.zjujournals.com/soc/CN/10.3785/j.issn.1008-942X.CN33-6000/C.2024.11.111     或     https://www.zjujournals.com/soc/CN/Y2024/V54/I12/81
发表一流的成果,传播一流的发现,提供一流的新知

浙ICP备14002560号-5
版权所有 © 2009 浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版)    浙ICP备05074421号
地址:杭州市天目山路148号 邮编:310028 电话:0571-88273210 88925616 E-mail:zdxb_w@zju.edu.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发  技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn