浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版)
 
   2025年6月7日 星期六   首页 |  期刊介绍 |  编委会 |  投稿指南 |  信息服务 |  期刊订阅 |  联系我们 |  预印本过刊 |  浙江省高校学报研究会栏目 |  留言板 |  English Version
浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版)  2023, Vol. 53 Issue (11): 62-85    DOI: 10.3785/j.issn.1008-942X.CN33-6000/C.2022.11.104
□ 管理学研究 最新目录| 下期目录| 过刊浏览| 高级检索 |
高管—核心员工股权激励差距与企业创新产出:促进还是抑制?
陈文强1, 王晓婷2, 贾生华3
1.浙江财经大学 会计学院,浙江 杭州 310018
2.浙江工商大学 工商管理学院,浙江 杭州 310018
3.浙江大学 管理学院,浙江 杭州 310058
Equity Incentive Disparity Between Top Executives and Core Employees and Corporate Innovation Output: Enhancing or Impeding?
Chen Wenqiang1, Wang Xiaoting2, Jia Shenghua3
1.School of Accounting, Zhejiang University of Finance & Economics, Hangzhou 310018, China
2.School of Business Management, Zhejiang Gongshang University, Hangzhou 310018, China
3.School of Management, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China

全文: PDF (902 KB)   RICH HTML
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 高管和核心员工是股权激励方案的两大激励对象,也是企业创新活动中最重要的两类人力资源。然而,当前研究多从绝对激励力度的视角考察股权激励的创新影响效应,忽略了高管和核心员工这两大群体间相对激励差异的作用效果。实证结果发现,高管和核心员工的股权激励差距显著降低了企业的创新产出,且在时间维度上呈现出了持续强化的动态特征。降低员工努力程度、破坏团队协作和加剧员工流失是股权激励差距降低企业创新产出的三条渠道。股权激励差距的创新抑制效应在内部晋升可能性小、薪酬信息可得性高和员工公平感知度强的样本中更加显著。同时,股权激励差距恶化了专利结构,降低了专利被引用数以及专利的应用价值和市场价值。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入我的书架
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
陈文强
王晓婷
贾生华
关键词 股权激励内部激励差距企业创新产出薪酬比较高管核心员工    
Abstract:Corporate innovation constitutes a complex team endeavor characterized by high investments, exploratory efforts and multiple stages, which necessitates collaborative efforts and collective participation of the members in innovation teams. Among them, senior executives and core employees are the two most critical groups of human resources. How to design scientific team compensation to stimulate the innovation enthusiasm of both senior executives and core employees remains a pivotal topic within the realm of corporate governance. Equity incentive, a typical team-based compensation aimed at fostering organizational innovation, encompasses both senior executives and core employees as beneficiaries. The incentive disparity between the two groups of recipients inevitably, affects their psychological perception and behavioral decisions. Moreover, equity incentive plan is a document that the China Securities Regulatory Commission mandates to be publicly disclosed. Listed companies are obligated to publicly disclose the list of incentive recipients and the quantity of granted equity. This offers employees a detailed and convenient information channel for compensation comparison. However, existing researches have predominantly examined the isolated impact of equity incentive for senior executives or core employees on corporate innovation from the perspective of absolute incentive levels, which has overlooked the effect of the incentive disparity between the two groups of incentive recipients.Based on the data of Chinese A-share listed companies from 2006 to 2020, this study examines the impact and mechanisms of equity incentive disparity (EID) between senior executives and core employees on corporate innovation output (CIO). The findings suggest that EID significantly hampers CIO and this inhibitory effect exhibits a trend of continuous strengthening. Mechanism tests reveal that reducing employee effort, hindering team collaboration, and disrupting team stability are the underlying channels through which EID impedes CIO. Supplementary analysis demonstrates that the innovation inhibitory effect of EID is more pronounced in samples with a low likelihood of internal promotion, high accessibility to compensation information, and a high sense of employee fairness perception. Further studies based on innovation output quality indicate that EID worsens patent structures and reduces patent citations. Diving deeper into the quality of innovation output suggests that EID diminishes the application and market value of patents.This paper contributes to the literature and practice in the following three dimensions. First, the study reveals the inhibitory effect of EID on CIO and further unveils the internal mechanisms from the perspectives of employee effort, team collaboration, and employee stability. This exploration widens the understanding of disparities in internal compensation through the lens of equity-based incentives. Second, the study illuminates that EID is also a crucial factor influencing CIO, which extends the scope of research on equity incentive contracts from the viewpoint of internal relative incentive disparities. Third, the study has important implications. For companies, it provides valuable insights to optimize equity incentive contract designs and stimulate innovative capacities. For policy makers, it offers important reference to improve the regulatory system of equity incentive plans and optimize the distribution of equity compensation within enterprises.
Key wordsequity incentive    internal incentive disparity    corporate innovation output    compensation comparison    senior executives    core employees   
收稿日期: 2022-11-10     
基金资助:浙江省哲学社会科学青年重点项目(24NDQN09Z);国家自然科学青年基金项目(72002190);国家社会科学基金项目(19BGL088);教育部人文社会科学青年基金项目(18YJC630184);浙江省自然科学基金一般项目(LY24G020007)
作者简介: 1.陈文强(https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1891-6300),男,浙江财经大学会计学院副教授,管理学博士,主要从事公司治理和股权激励研究;2;王晓婷(https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3490-9189)(通信作者),女,浙江工商大学工商管理学院(MBA学院)、浙商研究院副教授,管理学博士,主要从事家族企业与风险投资研究;3;贾生华(https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4105-9653),男,浙江大学管理学院教授,博士生导师,经济学博士,主要从事公司治理与房地产投资研究;
引用本文:   
陈文强, 王晓婷, 贾生华. 高管—核心员工股权激励差距与企业创新产出:促进还是抑制?[J]. 浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2023, 53(11): 62-85. Chen Wenqiang, Wang Xiaoting, Jia Shenghua. Equity Incentive Disparity Between Top Executives and Core Employees and Corporate Innovation Output: Enhancing or Impeding?. JOURNAL OF ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY, 2023, 53(11): 62-85.
链接本文:  
https://www.zjujournals.com/soc/CN/10.3785/j.issn.1008-942X.CN33-6000/C.2022.11.104     或     https://www.zjujournals.com/soc/CN/Y2023/V53/I11/62
发表一流的成果,传播一流的发现,提供一流的新知

浙ICP备14002560号-5
版权所有 © 2009 浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版)    浙ICP备05074421号
地址:杭州市天目山路148号 邮编:310028 电话:0571-88273210 88925616 E-mail:zdxb_w@zju.edu.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发  技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn