浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版)
 
   2025年5月25日 星期日   首页 |  期刊介绍 |  编委会 |  投稿指南 |  信息服务 |  期刊订阅 |  联系我们 |  预印本过刊 |  浙江省高校学报研究会栏目 |  留言板 |  English Version
浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版)  2018, Vol. 4 Issue (2): 227-239    DOI: 10.3785/j.issn.1008-942X.CN33-6000/C.2016.03.071
历史研究 最新目录| 下期目录| 过刊浏览| 高级检索 |
手工业社会主义改造及其效率分析(1953—1956年)——基于浙江的研究
陈麟1, 2
1.浙江大学 人文学院, 浙江 杭州 310028;
2.浙江大学城市学院 法学院, 浙江 杭州 310015
Socialist Transformation of Handicraft Industry and Its Efficiency (1953-1956):A Case Study in Zhejiang
Chen Lin1, 2
1.School of Humanities, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310028, China;
2.School of Law, Zhejiang University City College, Hangzhou 310015, China

全文: PDF (1727 KB)   RICH HTML
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 

20世纪50年代,国家对手工业进行合作化改造。在此过程中除了为手工业提供必要的技术、资金、原料等方面的支持外,发生最大变化的是手工业的生产关系,国家取代以往众多的商人、工场主,成为实际意义上的“包买商”,试图以社会化大生产的方式来提高手工业的生产力,进而壮大社会主义经济成分。但合作化后期所反映出来的种种问题揭示了只有在生产关系基本适应生产力的情况下,才能真正、有效地推动生产力的发展。

服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入我的书架
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
Abstract

In the 1950s, to establish new production relations and to promote the productivity, China made collectivized changes in handicraft industry. In the process of collectivization, fundamental technology, fund and raw materials were provided to support the handicraft industry. What changed most was the production relation in handicraft industry. With the development of socialist and the improvement of the productivity, China determined to improve the production of collectivized community (or group) through sharing experience, promoting procedure, optimizing management and implementing semi-mechanization and mechanization. By the mode of socialized large-scale production, China attempted to improve the productivity of the handicraft industry and to strengthen socialist economy. In Zhejiang, some collectivized community could accelerate the development of mechanization and semi-mechanization through power equipment, but the equipment only provided limited support. Therefore, several years after the completion of transformation, the mechanization and semi-mechanization even stayed backward. On the other hand, community members with little education were not good at technology and machinery operation, which restricted the mechanized and semi-mechanized production. This paper analyzes the production efficiency before and after the collectivization, and finds that without the implementation of labor advantages, the adding of the labor number couldn’t produce good effect in terms of marginal benefit. Compared with those family workshops (or family handicraft workshops) which were of small investment, flexible running and simple management, the profit of the collectivized community was gradually declining due to the cost of management and salary. What’s more, the personal value of those handicrafts men who acquired good techniques and possessed high efficiency could not be motivated in this system of salary, and this greatly decreased their enthusiasm over production. To stimulate the profit rate, more investment had to be made (including technology) and the industry scale had to be expanded, which again dragged the national resources into the ″fund swamp″. With the background of national industrialization, the limited fund and raw materials would definitely go to the industry construction. The government had no more fund to give support to handicraft industry. All those problems arising at the end of collectivization exposed that only when the production relations fundamentally adapt to the productivity could the productivity be effectively promoted. However, with poor technology and short fund, the complicated socialist reformation of the handicraft industry was carried out smoothly, which pushed the handicraft industry to the development of semi-mechanization and mechanization. This was really a profound reform of historic significance.

收稿日期: 2016-03-07     
基金资助:

教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目(14JZD005)

作者简介: 陈麟(http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0069-5490),男,浙江大学人文学院历史系博士研究生,浙江大学城市学院法学院讲师,主要从事中共党史、中华人民共和国史研究。
引用本文:   
陈麟. 手工业社会主义改造及其效率分析(1953—1956年)——基于浙江的研究[J]. 浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2018, 4(2): 227-239. Chen Lin. Socialist Transformation of Handicraft Industry and Its Efficiency (1953-1956):A Case Study in Zhejiang. JOURNAL OF ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY, 2018, 4(2): 227-239.
链接本文:  
https://www.zjujournals.com/soc/CN/10.3785/j.issn.1008-942X.CN33-6000/C.2016.03.071     或     https://www.zjujournals.com/soc/CN/Y2018/V4/I2/227
发表一流的成果,传播一流的发现,提供一流的新知

浙ICP备14002560号-5
版权所有 © 2009 浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版)    浙ICP备05074421号
地址:杭州市天目山路148号 邮编:310028 电话:0571-88273210 88925616 E-mail:zdxb_w@zju.edu.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发  技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn