水制度,总体框架,结构演变,规制强度,水资源,水环境,水生态," /> 水制度,总体框架,结构演变,规制强度,水资源,水环境,水生态,"/> water institution,overall framework,structural evolution,regulation intensity,water resource,water environment,water ecology,"/> 中国水制度的总体框架、结构演变与规制强度
浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版)
 
   2025年5月24日 星期六   首页 |  期刊介绍 |  编委会 |  投稿指南 |  信息服务 |  期刊订阅 |  联系我们 |  预印本过刊 |  浙江省高校学报研究会栏目 |  留言板 |  English Version
浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版)
栏目 最新目录| 下期目录| 过刊浏览| 高级检索 |
中国水制度的总体框架、结构演变与规制强度
谢慧明  沈满洪
Water Institution of China: Its Overall Framework, Structural Evolution and Regulation Intensity
Xie Huiming Shen Manhong

全文: PDF (1436 KB)  
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 
中国水制度有广义和狭义之分。狭义的水制度包含水资源制度、水环境制度和水生态制度,具体包括取水总量控制制度、水污染物总量控制制度、水资源费制度、水权交易制度、水污染权交易制度、水生态补偿制度、水环境污染问责制度和水环境损害赔偿制度八类;广义的水制度还包括防洪制度、排涝制度、灌溉制度等。在经历数十年的沿革与演变后,各类水制度相互作用且共同服务于中国水生态文明建设。基于网络普查方法,在深入分析1978—2014年中国31个省区市各类狭义水制度的制度关系和结构演变后,基于三类量化思路对水规制强度进行了测度并探讨了它们的省际差异。研究表明,水制度之间存在前置、替代或互补关系;每个地区都在寻求不同的水制度特色,但甚少有地区在水制度建设中一枝独秀;制度先发地区创新优势明显,但是否能够保持领先优势则因制度而异。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入我的书架
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
谢慧明 沈满洪
关键词 水制度')" href="#">    
Abstract
Water Institution of China could be studied in broad and narrow frameworks. Related institutions of resources and the environment and even populations could all be nested in the broad framework,like flood control system, drainage system and irrigation system. However, this paper defines water institution of China in a narrow sense. Eight water systems are classified. They are total water withdrawal control system (TWWCS), total water pollutant control system (TWPCS), water resource fee system (WRFS), water right transaction system (WRTS), water pollutant right transaction system (WPRTS), water eco-compensation system (WECS), accountability system for water pollution (ASWPS) and payment system for damages of water pollution (PSDWP). Some of these systems could be ordered logically: TWPCS is a prerequisite system of TWWCS, TWWCS is the prerequisite of WRFS and WRTS, TWPCS is the prerequisite of WPRTS. Instead of the prerequisite relationship, some of the systems hold substitutive or complementary relations: WRTS and WPRTS are complementary while these two systems were once carried out through a substitutive way under the WECS. Since 1978, these systems have evolved to deal with specific water issues and serve as institutional supports for water ecological civilization in China. TWWCS started in 1987 when the ″Water Resource Allocation Scheme for the Yellow River″ was launched by Chinas State Council. Followed by the Water Law of the People’s Republic of China in 1988, China began to implement the WRFS. The first practice of WRTS in China occurred in Zhejiang Province in 2000 and in the same period China began to implement the WECS based on the WRTS. Afterwards, WECS focused on both the quantity and quality of water as the Water Pollution Prevention and Control Law of Peoples Republic of China (2008 Amendment) was introduced. TWPCS appeared in Shanghai in 1985 when the Headwater Protection Ordinance in Huangpu River was implemented and enterprises in Shanghai started to transfer their excess certified emission allowances since 1987. ASWPS and PSDWP were initiated in 1979 and 1991 respectively. Environmental Protection Law (Trial) of 1979 formulated the cases of political accountability while the economic accountability is defined by the ″Interim Sanction on Violations of Environmental Protection Law and discipline″ in 2006. The typical arrangement of PSDWP is the pollution liability insurance system which was first launched in Dalian in 1991 and was carried out nationwide since 2007. The empirical studies proposed in our study on the structural evolution of water institution demonstrate that the prerequisite, substitutive and complementary relationship holds between these different water system elements. Based on an Internet review of all the available water institutions between 1978 and 2014 of all the 31 provinces, we estimated the regulation intensity of water institution. The statistics analysis shows that provinces used to pursue outstanding performances in water institution but few provinces could outperform the other provinces in all types of systems. The statistics results also indicate that the provinces which executed water institutions earlier often hold significant advantages in institutional innovations but it is still not clear whether it can maintain the advantages.
Key wordswater institution')" href="#">   
    
引用本文:   
谢慧明 沈满洪. 中国水制度的总体框架、结构演变与规制强度[J]. 浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2016, 2(4): 159-169. Xie Huiming Shen Manhong. Water Institution of China: Its Overall Framework, Structural Evolution and Regulation Intensity. JOURNAL OF ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY, 2016, 2(4): 159-169.
链接本文:  
https://www.zjujournals.com/soc/CN/     或     https://www.zjujournals.com/soc/CN/Y2016/V2/I4/159
发表一流的成果,传播一流的发现,提供一流的新知

浙ICP备14002560号-5
版权所有 © 2009 浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版)    浙ICP备05074421号
地址:杭州市天目山路148号 邮编:310028 电话:0571-88273210 88925616 E-mail:zdxb_w@zju.edu.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发  技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn