浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版)
 
   2025年5月24日 星期六   首页 |  期刊介绍 |  编委会 |  投稿指南 |  信息服务 |  期刊订阅 |  联系我们 |  预印本过刊 |  浙江省高校学报研究会栏目 |  留言板 |  English Version
浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版)
栏目 最新目录| 下期目录| 过刊浏览| 高级检索 |
司法透明指数评估指标探讨
肖建飞 钱弘道
浙江大学 光华法学院, 浙江 杭州 310008
A Discussion on the Evaluation Index of Judicial Transparency Index
Xiao Jianfei Qian Hongdao
Guanghua Law School, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310008, China

全文: PDF (1444 KB)  
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 

在中国全面深化司法公开改革背景下,司法公开广度和深度不断拓展,司法公开评估应运而生。司法透明指数吴兴实验、浙江法院阳光司法指数、河北法院阳光司法指数三个代表性指标体系既有共性,也有差异。当下司法透明指数评估的目标应定位于持续推进司法公开,督促法院保障公民获得公正裁判权与知情监督权;指标设计的前提在于明确司法公开的内容、性质、范围、对象和载体;还要适应评估实效性要求,调整评估维度,优化、完善具体指标设计。调整、优化后的司法透明指标体系具有普遍适用性和推广应用价值。

服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入我的书架
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
肖建飞 钱弘道
关键词 司法公开司法透明指数指标体系    
Abstract

Judicial publicity has gone beyond the original implication of public hearing, under the background of China's all-round deepening reform of judicial publicity. Judicial information has been fully disclosed to improve public understanding, confidence and supervision of judiciary, with the effort of Chinese courts to establish an open, dynamic, transparent and convenient sunny judiciary. Judicial publicity evaluation has thus risen in response to the requirement to assess the performance of judicial publicity objectively, to fully reveal the achievement, shortage and problems of judicial publicity. The thesis makes a study on three cases, which are judicial transparency index Wuxing experiment, Zhejiang courts sunny judicial index and Hebei courts sunny judicial index, to analyze the generality and differences of the three index systems. The above three items of evaluation were all carried out by neutral third party, and emphases were all put on the assessment of judgments enforcement transparency. The three systems vary on their basis of index designs and index designs of non-case-related disclosure contents. This should not be commented simply, because to design different index systems according to different judicial policy background and evaluation objects, is exactly adaptable to the demand of judicial publicity evaluation effectiveness. As the first evaluation index applied to the judicial publicity practice, pilot experience of judicial transparency index evaluation should be summed up and the index system be revised comprehensively. At the present time, the goal of the judicial transparency index evaluation should be put to steer, spur and push forward the judicial publicity persistently, and to supervise and urge the courts to ensure the rights of impartial trial and information-based supervision. Emphasis of the evaluation should be put on the publicity of judicial information. The precondition of index designing is to define the content, nature, scope, objective and carriers. That is, to transfer from judgment enforcement publicity to judicial administration publicity gradually, to realize the full opening up of judicial process and judgment as a whole, to realize full scope of disclosure of judicial documents and reason of confidential documents, to disclose information differently and with priority to parties and to public, and to use traditional and modern carriers comprehensively. Judicial transparency evaluation system keeps two basic parts of public opinion survey index and dynamic monitoring index. Dynamic monitoring index includes two dimensions of judicial administration publicity and judgment enforcement publicity. The system consists of seven first-level indicators as combined plates: trial administration publicity, personnel administration publicity, financial administration publicity, trial process publicity, enforcement process publicity, judgment document publicity and supporting mechanism. It also establishes 42 second-level indicators through reservation, integration and establishing.

Key wordsjudicial transparency    judicial transparency index    index system   
    
引用本文:   
肖建飞 钱弘道. 司法透明指数评估指标探讨[J]. 浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2015, 1(4): 9-29. Xiao Jianfei Qian Hongdao. A Discussion on the Evaluation Index of Judicial Transparency Index. JOURNAL OF ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY, 2015, 1(4): 9-29.
链接本文:  
https://www.zjujournals.com/soc/CN/     或     https://www.zjujournals.com/soc/CN/Y2015/V1/I4/9
发表一流的成果,传播一流的发现,提供一流的新知

浙ICP备14002560号-5
版权所有 © 2009 浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版)    浙ICP备05074421号
地址:杭州市天目山路148号 邮编:310028 电话:0571-88273210 88925616 E-mail:zdxb_w@zju.edu.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发  技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn