信息集成算子是多属性决策研究的重要内容之一.当前, 信息集成算子主要有(加权)算术平均算子(WA)[1]、(加权)几何平均算子(WG)[2]、有序加权平均算子(OWA)[3]、有序加权几何平均算子(OWG)[4]、有序加权调和平均算子(OWH)[5]、广义加权有序平均算子(GOWA)[6]、拟有序加权平均算子(QOWA)[7]等.最近, 在QOWA算子的启发下, 刘卫锋等[8]将拟函数与有序加权几何算子相结合, 定义了拟有序加权几何算子(QOWG), 并将其推广至毕达哥拉斯模糊决策环境.QOWG算子的提出丰富了集成算子的类型, 发展了集成算子理论.
由于实际决策中经常碰到区间数决策信息的情况, 许多学者开始研究区间数决策信息集成, 并取得了一系列研究成果.其中, XU等[9 — 11]提出了UOWA算子、UOWG算子、区间数幂均算子; MERIGÓ等研究了UIOWAWA算子[12]及区间诱导QOWA集成算子[13]; RAN等[14]将优先加权平均算子推广到区间数, 定义了UPWA算子、UPWG算子及UPWHA算子; YAGER等[15 — 16]研究了COWA算子以及COWG算子, XU[17]将COWA算子应用于求解区间模糊偏好关系的排序向量; 徐泽水[18]定义了WCOWA算子、OWCOWA算子及CCOWA算子; 龚艳冰等[19]提出了模糊COWA算子; 汪新凡[20]定义了WCOWG算子、OWCOWG算子及CCOWG算子; 丁德臣等[21]定义了模糊COWG算子; WU等[22]研究了ICOWG算子; 陈华友等[23]探讨了COWH算子; ZHOU等[24]提出了CGOWA算子及其扩展; LIU等[25]定义了CQOWA算子.分析发现, 上述集成算子大致可分为2类:一类是以XU为代表的将集成算子直接由实数推广至区间数, 如文献[9-14].但此类算子在集成过程中涉及区间数的各种运算, 利用可能度[9]等方法实现区间数的排序, 而区间数运算往往易导致不确定性的增加, 使得到的结果出现较大误差甚至失真.另一类是以YAGER和XU为代表, 主要通过引入反映决策者决策态度的态度参数将区间数转化为实数, 然后进行集成, 如文献[15-25].该类算子避免了区间数运算和排序引发的系列问题.
由于目前QOWG算子仅适用于精确数信息的集成, 因而有必要将其推广至区间数决策环境, 定义连续区间QOWG算子, 扩大QOWG算子的决策应用范围.借助生成函数, 连续区间QOWG算子可将多种信息集成为算子综合在一个函数表达式之中, 故而在决策中, 决策者只需通过控制生成函数即可实现决策结果的调整, 从而令不同的生成函数对应于不同的集成算子; 同时, 连续区间QOWG算子中态度参数的选择也给决策者带来了很大的主动性.因此, 研究连续区间QOWG算子, 对于发展QOWG集成算子以及区间数集成算子均具有重要的理论和现实意义.
根据以上分析, 笔者尝试将QOWG算子推广至连续区间的数决策环境.首先, 定义连续QOWG算子(continuous QOWG operator, CQOWG), 讨论其性质和特殊形式.其次, 定义CQOWG算子的orness测度, 探讨orness测度的性质.然后, 拓展CQOWG算子, 定义了加权连续QOWG算子(WCQOWG)、有序加权连续QOWG算子(OWCQOWG)以及组合连续QOWG算子(CCQOWG), 并探讨了它们的性质.最后, 提出基于CQOWA算子的群决策方法, 并通过决策实例说明其可行性与有效性.
1 相关概念定义1[8] 设ai∈R+(i=1, 2, …, n)为一组待集成数据, 其中R+={x|x>0}, 若函数
$ {\rm{QOWG}}: = {\left( {{R^ + }} \right)^n} \to {R^ + }, $ |
$ {\rm{QOWG}}\left( {{a_1},{a_2}, \cdots ,{a_n}} \right) = {f^{ - 1}}\left( {\prod\limits_{j = 1}^n {{{\left( {f\left( {{b_j}} \right)} \right)}^{{w_j}}}} } \right), $ |
则称QOWG为拟有序加权几何算子, 简称QOWG算子, 其中bj表示ai(i=1, 2, …, n)中第j大的数, f为严格单调连续函数, 而(w1, w2, …, wn)为与QOWG算子相关联的权重向量, wj≥0且
定义2[15] 若函数F:Ω→R+满足
$ {F_Q}\left( {\left[ {a,b} \right]} \right) = \int_0^1 {\frac{{{\rm{d}}Q\left( y \right)}}{{{\rm{d}}y}}\left( {b - y\left( {b - a} \right)} \right){\rm{d}}y} , $ |
则称F为COWA算子, 其中[a, b]∈Ω, Ω={[a, b]| 0 < a≤b}, F与Q有关, 称Q为基本单位区间单调函数(BUM), 满足Q:[0, 1]→[0, 1], 且Q(0)=0, Q(1)=1.
定理1[15] 设
$ {F_Q}\left( {\left[ {a,b} \right]} \right) = \mu b + \left( {1 - \mu } \right)a, $ |
其中, μ为BUM函数Q的态度参数.
定义3[16] 若函数G:Ω→R+满足
$ {G_Q}\left( {\left[ {a,b} \right]} \right) = b\left( {\frac{a}{b}} \right)\int_0^1 {\frac{{{\rm{d}}Q\left( y \right)}}{{{\rm{d}}y}}y{\rm{d}}y} , $ |
则称G为COWG算子, 其中[a, b]∈Ω, G与Q有关, Q为BUM函数.
定理2[16] 设
定义4[23] 若函数H:Ω→R+满足
$ {H_Q}\left( {\left[ {a,b} \right]} \right) = \frac{1}{{\int_0^1 {\frac{{{\rm{d}}Q\left( y \right)}}{{{\rm{d}}y}}\left( {\frac{1}{b} - y\left( {\frac{1}{a} - \frac{1}{b}} \right)} \right){\rm{d}}y} }}, $ |
则称H为COWH算子, 其中[a, b]∈Ω, H与Q有关, Q为BUM函数.
定理3[23] 设
定义5[24] 若函数g:Ω→R+满足
$ {g_Q}\left( {\left[ {a,b} \right]} \right) = {\left( {\int_0^1 {\frac{{{\rm{d}}Q\left( y \right)}}{{{\rm{d}}y}}\left( {{b^\lambda } - y\left( {{b^\lambda } - {a^\lambda }} \right)} \right){\rm{d}}y} } \right)^{1/\lambda }}{\rm{d}}y, $ |
则称函数g为连续区间广义OWA算子, 简称CGOWA算子, 其中[a, b]∈Ω, g与Q有关, Q为BUM函数, 参数λ∈R-{0}.
定理4[24] 设
定义6[25] 若函数φ:Ω→R+满足
$ {\varphi _{Q,f}}\left( {\left[ {a,b} \right]} \right) = {f^{ - 1}}\left\{ {\int_0^1 {\frac{{{\rm{d}}Q\left( y \right)}}{{{\rm{d}}y}}\left( {f\left( b \right) - y\left( {f\left( b \right) - f\left( b \right)} \right)} \right){\rm{d}}y} } \right\}, $ |
则称函数φ为连续区间拟OWA算子, 简称CQOWA算子, 其中[a, b]∈Ω, φ与Q有关, Q为与函数φ相关联的BUM函数, f为[a, b]上严格单调的连续函数, 称为φQ, f([a, b])的导出函数.
定理5[25] 设
$ {\varphi _{Q,f}}\left( {\left[ {a,b} \right]} \right) = {f^{ - 1}}\left[ {f\left( a \right) - \mu \left( {f\left( b \right) - f\left( a \right)} \right)} \right], $ |
其中μ为BUM函数Q的态度参数.
2 连续拟有序加权几何算子定义7 设[a, b]∈Ω, 若函数φ:Ω→R+满足
$ {\varphi _{Q,f}}\left( {\left[ {a,b} \right]} \right) = {f^{ - 1}}\left\{ {f\left( b \right){{\left( {\frac{{f\left( a \right)}}{{f\left( b \right)}}} \right)}^{\int_0^1 {\frac{{{\rm{d}}Q\left( y \right)}}{{{\rm{d}}y}}y{\rm{d}}y} }}} \right\}, $ |
则称函数φ为连续区间拟OWG算子, 简称CQOWG算子, 其中, Q为与函数φ相关联的BUM函数, f为[a, b]上严格单调的连续函数, 称为φQ, f([a, b])的导出函数.
下面从定积分角度说明定义7中公式的由来.
设[a, b]∈Ω, f为[a, b]上的严格单调连续函数, Q(y)为BUM函数, 则由BUM函数可得到QOWG算子的一组加权向量
$ {\mathit{\boldsymbol{w}}_j} = Q\left( {\frac{j}{n}} \right) - Q\left( {\frac{{j - 1}}{n}} \right),j = 1,2, \cdots ,n, $ |
满足wj∈[0, 1], j=1, 2, …, n且
下面构造一组离散的数据集合逼近连续区间数[a, b].
令
$ f\left[ {f\left( b \right){{\left( {\frac{{f\left( a \right)}}{{f\left( b \right)}}} \right)}^{\frac{j}{n}}}} \right] \ge f\left[ {f\left( b \right){{\left( {\frac{{f\left( a \right)}}{{f\left( b \right)}}} \right)}^{\frac{{j + 1}}{n}}}} \right], $ |
即qj≥qj+1, 于是得到q0≥q1≥q2≥…≥qn.当f(x)严格单调连续递减时, 同理也可得到q0≥q1≥q2≥…≥qn.
根据QOWG算子, 可以得到
$ \begin{array}{l} {\varphi _{Q,f}}\left( {\left[ {a,b} \right]} \right) \approx {\rm{QOWG}}\left( {{q_1},{q_2}, \cdots ,{q_n}} \right) = \\ \;\;\;\;\;\;{f^{ - 1}}\left\{ {\prod\limits_{j = 1}^n {{{\left( {f\left( {{q_j}} \right)} \right)}^{{w_j}}}} } \right\} = \\ \;\;\;\;\;\;{f^{ - 1}}\left\{ {\prod\limits_{j = 1}^n {{{\left( {f\left( b \right){{\left( {\frac{{f\left( a \right)}}{{f\left( b \right)}}} \right)}^{j/n}}} \right)}^{Q\left( {\frac{j}{n}} \right) - Q\left( {\frac{{j - 1}}{n}} \right)}}} } \right\} = \\ \;\;\;\;\;\;{f^{ - 1}}\left\{ {f\left( b \right){{\left( {\frac{{f\left( a \right)}}{{f\left( b \right)}}} \right)}^{\sum\limits_{j = 1}^n {\frac{j}{n}\left( {Q\left( {\frac{j}{n}} \right) - Q\left( {\frac{{j - 1}}{n}} \right)} \right)} }}} \right\}. \end{array} $ |
令Δy=1/n, 有
$ \begin{array}{l} {\varphi _{Q,f}}\left( {\left[ {a,b} \right]} \right) \approx \\ \;\;\;\;\;\;{f^{ - 1}}\left\{ {f\left( b \right){{\left( {\frac{{f\left( a \right)}}{{f\left( b \right)}}} \right)}^{\sum\limits_{j = 1}^n {j\Delta y\left( {Q\left( {j\Delta y} \right) - Q\left( {j\Delta y - \Delta y} \right)} \right)} }}} \right\} = \\ \;\;\;\;\;\;{f^{ - 1}}\left\{ {f\left( b \right){{\left( {\frac{{f\left( a \right)}}{{f\left( b \right)}}} \right)}^{\sum\limits_{j = 1}^n {j\Delta y\left( {\frac{{Q\left( {j\Delta y} \right) - Q\left( {j\Delta y - \Delta y} \right)}}{{\Delta y}}} \right)\Delta y} }}} \right\}. \end{array} $ |
令y=jΔy, 则当j从0取到n时, 有y∈[0, 1], 对上式两端取极限, 令n→+∞, 得到
$ {\varphi _{Q,f}}\left( {\left[ {a,b} \right]} \right) = {f^{ - 1}}\left\{ {f\left( b \right){{\left( {\frac{{f\left( a \right)}}{{f\left( b \right)}}} \right)}^{\int_0^1 {\frac{{{\rm{d}}Q\left( y \right)}}{{{\rm{d}}y}}y{\rm{d}}y} }}} \right\}. $ |
定理6 设
证明
$ \begin{array}{l} {\varphi _{Q,f}}\left( {\left[ {a,b} \right]} \right) = {f^{ - 1}}\left\{ {f\left( b \right){{\left( {\frac{{f\left( a \right)}}{{f\left( b \right)}}} \right)}^{\int_0^1 {\frac{{{\rm{d}}Q\left( y \right)}}{{{\rm{d}}y}}y{\rm{d}}y} }}} \right\} = \\ \;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;{f^{ - 1}}\left\{ {f\left( b \right){{\left( {\frac{{f\left( a \right)}}{{f\left( b \right)}}} \right)}^{\int_0^1 {y{\rm{d}}Q\left( y \right)} }}} \right\} = \\ \;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;{f^{ - 1}}\left\{ {f\left( b \right){{\left( {\frac{{f\left( a \right)}}{{f\left( b \right)}}} \right)}^{1 - \int_0^1 {Q\left( y \right){\rm{d}}y} }}} \right\} = \\ \;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;{f^{ - 1}}\left\{ {f\left( b \right){{\left( {\frac{{f\left( a \right)}}{{f\left( b \right)}}} \right)}^{1 - \mu }}} \right\} = \\ \;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;{f^{ - 1}}\left\{ {f{{\left( a \right)}^{1 - \mu }}f{{\left( b \right)}^\mu }} \right\}. \end{array} $ |
下面讨论CQOWG算子的特殊情况.
(1) 当f(x)=kx, k≠0时, φQ, f([a, b])=bμa1-μ, 即CQOWG算子退化为COWG算子.
(2) 当f(x)=ekx, k≠0时,
$ {\varphi _{Q,f}}\left( {\left[ {a,b} \right]} \right) = \mu b + \left( {1 - \mu } \right)a, $ |
即CQOWG算子退化为COWA算子.
(3) 当f(x)=
φQ, f([a, b])=1/[(1-μ)/b+μ/b],
即CQOWG算子退化为COWH算子.
(4) 当Q(y)=yr, r>0时,
$ {\varphi _{Q,f}}\left( {\left[ {a,b} \right]} \right) = {f^{ - 1}}\left[ {f{{\left( a \right)}^{\frac{r}{{r + 1}}}}f{{\left( b \right)}^{\frac{r}{{r + 1}}}}} \right]. $ |
此时, 若r=1, 则有
φQ, f([a, b])=f-1[f(a)1/2f(b)1/2].
若r→0, 则有 φQ, f([a, b])=b.
若r→+∞, 则有 φQ, f([a, b])=a.
若r=k/K, 则有
$ {\varphi _{Q,f}}\left( {\left[ {a,b} \right]} \right) = {f^{ - 1}}\left[ {f{{\left( a \right)}^{\frac{k}{{k + K}}}}f{{\left( b \right)}^{\frac{k}{{k + K}}}}} \right]. $ |
下面讨论CQOWG算子的性质.
定理7(单调性) 设φ是CQOWG算子, 若a1≤a2, b1≤b2, 则对于任意BUM函数Q和导出函数f, 有φQ, f([a1, b1])≤φQ, f([a2, b2]).
证明 分2种情况证明.
(1) 当函数f(x)严格单调递增时, 函数f-1(x)也严格单调递增, 则由a1≤a2, b1≤b2得f(a1)≤f(a2), f(b1)≤f(b2), 也即有f(a1)1-μ≤f(a2)1-μ, f(b1)μ≤f(b2)μ, 于是
$ f{\left( {{a_1}} \right)^{1 - \mu }}f{\left( {{b_1}} \right)^\mu } \le f{\left( {{a_2}} \right)^{1 - \mu }}f{\left( {{b_2}} \right)^\mu }, $ |
即有
$ {f^{ - 1}}\left[ {f{{\left( {{a_1}} \right)}^{1 - \mu }}f{{\left( {{b_1}} \right)}^\mu }} \right] \le {f^{ - 1}}\left[ {f{{\left( {{a_2}} \right)}^{1 - \mu }}f{{\left( {{b_2}} \right)}^\mu }} \right], $ |
所以有
$ {\varphi _{Q,f}}\left( {\left[ {{a_1},{b_1}} \right]} \right) \le {\varphi _{Q,f}}\left( {\left[ {{a_2},{b_2}} \right]} \right). $ |
(2) 当函数f(x)严格单调递减时, 同理可证
$ {\varphi _{Q,f}}\left( {\left[ {{a_1},{b_1}} \right]} \right) \le {\varphi _{Q,f}}\left( {\left[ {{a_2},{b_2}} \right]} \right). $ |
定理8(有界性) 设φ是CQOWG算子, 则a≤φQ, f([a, b])≤b.
证明 注意到当a=b时, φQ, f([a, b])=a, 然后由单调性可得
a=φQ, f([a, a])≤φQ, f([a, b])≤φQ, f([b, b])=b.
定理9(关于Q的单调性) 设φ是CQOWG算子, 若Q1(x), Q2(x)为BUM函数, 且x∈[0, 1], Q1(x)≤Q2(x), 则有
φQ1, f([a, b])≤φQ2, f([a, b]).
证明 令
下面分2种情况证明.
(1) 当函数f(x)严格单调递增时, 函数f-1(x)也严格单调递增, 则由a≤b得f(a)≤f(b), 进而有
$ {\left( {\frac{{f\left( b \right)}}{{f\left( a \right)}}} \right)^{1 - {\mu _1}}} \ge {\left( {\frac{{f\left( b \right)}}{{f\left( a \right)}}} \right)^{1 - {\mu _2}}}, $ |
$ f\left( b \right){\left( {\frac{{f\left( a \right)}}{{f\left( b \right)}}} \right)^{1 - {\mu _1}}} \le f\left( b \right){\left( {\frac{{f\left( a \right)}}{{f\left( b \right)}}} \right)^{1 - {\mu _2}}}, $ |
即有
$ {f^{ - 1}}\left[ {f\left( b \right){{\left( {\frac{{f\left( a \right)}}{{f\left( b \right)}}} \right)}^{1 - {\mu _1}}}} \right] \le {f^{ - 1}}\left[ {f\left( b \right){{\left( {\frac{{f\left( a \right)}}{{f\left( b \right)}}} \right)}^{1 - {\mu _2}}}} \right], $ |
于是 φQ1, f([a, b])≤φQ2, f([a, b]).
(2) 当函数f(x)严格单调递减时, 同理可证φQ1, f([a, b])≤φQ2, f([a, b]).
定理10 设f(x)是任意的严格单调连续函数, 若对任意k>0, 有g(x)=f(xk), 则有
$ {\varphi _{Q,g}}\left( {\left[ {a,b} \right]} \right) = {\left( {{\varphi _{Q,f}}\left( {\left[ {{a^k},{b^k}} \right]} \right)} \right)^{1/k}}. $ |
证明 令y=g(x)=f(xk), 则有
x=g-1(y)=(f-1(y))1/k,
于是有
$ \begin{array}{l} {\varphi _{Q,g}}\left( {\left[ {a,b} \right]} \right) = {g^{ - 1}}\left[ {g{{\left( a \right)}^{1 - \mu }}g{{\left( b \right)}^\mu }} \right] = \\ \;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;{g^{ - 1}}\left[ {{{\left( {f\left( {{a^k}} \right)} \right)}^{1 - \mu }}{{\left( {f\left( {{b^k}} \right)} \right)}^\mu }} \right] = \\ \;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;{\left( {{f^{ - 1}}\left[ {{{\left( {f\left( {{a^k}} \right)} \right)}^{1 - \mu }}\left( {f\left( {{b^k}} \right)} \right)\mu } \right]} \right)^{1/k}} = \\ \;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;{\left( {{\varphi _{Q,f}}\left( {\left[ {{a^k},{b^k}} \right]} \right)} \right)^{1/k}}. \end{array} $ |
定理11 设f(x)是任意的严格单调连续函数, g(x)是严格单调连续递增函数, 令h(x)=f(g(x)), 则φQ, h([a, b])=g-1(φQ, f([g(a), g(b)])).
证明 令y=h(x)=f(g(x)), 则有x=h-1(y)=g-1(f-1(y)), 于是
$ \begin{array}{l} {\varphi _{Q,h}}\left( {\left[ {a,b} \right]} \right) = {h^{ - 1}}\left[ {h{{\left( a \right)}^{1 - \mu }}h{{\left( b \right)}^\mu }} \right] = \\ \;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;{h^{ - 1}}\left[ {{{\left( {f\left( {g\left( a \right)} \right)} \right)}^{1 - \mu }}{{\left( {f\left( {g\left( b \right)} \right)} \right)}^\mu }} \right] = \\ \;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;{g^{ - 1}}\left\{ {{f^{ - 1}}\left[ {{{\left( {f\left( {g\left( a \right)} \right)} \right)}^{1 - \mu }}{{\left( {f\left( {g\left( b \right)} \right)} \right)}^\mu }} \right]} \right\} = \\ \;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;{g^{ - 1}}\left( {{\varphi _{Q,f}}\left( {\left[ {g\left( a \right),g\left( b \right)} \right]} \right)} \right). \end{array} $ |
受文献[25-27]启发, 本文将给出CQOWG算子的orness测度.
定义8 CQOWG算子的orness测度定义为
$ \begin{array}{*{20}{c}} {{\rm{ornes}}{{\rm{s}}_{Q,f}}\left( {\left[ {a,b} \right]} \right) = \frac{{{f^{ - 1}}\left\{ {f\left( b \right){{\left( {\frac{{f\left( a \right)}}{{f\left( b \right)}}} \right)}^{\int_0^1 {\frac{{{\rm{d}}Q\left( y \right)}}{{{\rm{d}}y}}y{\rm{d}}y} }}} \right\} - a}}{{b - a}} = }\\ {\frac{{{f^{ - 1}}\left[ {f{{\left( a \right)}^{1 - \mu }}f{{\left( b \right)}^\mu }} \right] - a}}{{b - a}}.} \end{array} $ |
显然, 当μ=0时, ornessQ, f([a, b])=0;当μ=1时, ornessQ, f([a, b])=1.
定理12 设φQ, f为任意的CQOWG算子, 则φQ, f([a, b])=a+(b-a)ornessQ, f([a, b]).
定理13 0≤ornessQ, f([a, b])≤1.
定理14 设ornessQ, f([a, b])是CQOWG算子Q, f([(a, b)])的orness测度, 若Q1(x), Q2(x)为BUM函数, 且x∈[0, 1], 有Q1(x)≤Q2(x), 则有ornessQ1, f([a, b] )≤ornessQ2, f([a, b]).
定理15 设f(x)是任意的严格单调连续函数, Q(x)为BUM函数, 若g(x)=k(f(x))c, k≠0, c≠0, 则φQ, g([a, b])=Q, f([a, b]), ornessQ, g([a, b])=ornessQ, f([a, b]).
证明 令y=g(x)=k(f(x))c, 则有
$ \begin{array}{l} {\phi _{Q,g}}\left( {\left[ {a,b} \right]} \right) = {g^{ - 1}}\left[ {g{{\left( a \right)}^{1 - \mu }}g{{\left( b \right)}^\mu }} \right] = \\ \;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;{g^{ - 1}}\left[ {{{\left( {k{{\left( {f\left( a \right)} \right)}^c}} \right)}^{1 - \mu }}{{\left( {k{{\left( {f\left( b \right)} \right)}^c}} \right)}^\mu }} \right] = \\ \;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;{g^{ - 1}}\left[ {k{{\left( {f\left( a \right)} \right)}^{c\left( {1 - \mu } \right)}}{{\left( {f\left( b \right)} \right)}^{c\mu }}} \right] = \\ \;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;{f^{ - 1}}\left[ {{{\left( {\frac{{k{{\left( {f\left( a \right)} \right)}^{c\left( {1 - \mu } \right)}}{{\left( {f\left( b \right)} \right)}^{c\mu }}}}{k}} \right)}^{1/c}}} \right] = \\ \;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;{f^{ - 1}}\left[ {{{\left( {f\left( a \right)} \right)}^{1/\mu }}{{\left( {f\left( b \right)} \right)}^\mu }} \right] = {\phi _{Q,f}}\left( {\left[ {a,b} \right]} \right). \end{array} $ |
由CQOWG算子的orness测度定义可知,
ornessQ, g([a, b])=ornessQ, f([a, b]).
4 CQOWG算子的推广CQOWG算子可以对单个连续区间数进行集成, 但不能集成多个连续区间数, 为此对其进行推广, 使之可以集合成2个或2个以上的连续区间数.
定义9 设[ai, bi](i=1, 2, …, n)为一组连续区间数, w=(w1, w2, …, wn)为加权向量, 且wi≥0, i=1, 2, …, n,
不难证明, WCQOWG算子具有下列性质:
定理16 设[ai, bi](i=1, 2, …, n)为一组连续区间数, w =(w1, w2, …, wn)为加权向量, 且wi≥0, i=1, 2, …, n,
(1) 幂等性
若ai=a, bi=b(i=1, 2, …, n), 则
γw([a1, b1], [a2, b2], …, [an, bn])=φQ, f([a, b]).
(2) 有界性
$ \mathop {\min }\limits_i \left\{ {{a_i}} \right\} \le {\gamma _w}\left( {\left[ {{a_1},{b_1}} \right],\left[ {{a_2},{b_2}} \right], \cdots ,\left[ {{a_n},{b_n}} \right]} \right) \le \mathop {\max }\limits_i \left\{ {{b_i}} \right\}. $ |
(3) 单调性
设[ci, di](i=1, 2, …, n)为另一组连续区间数, 若ai≤ci, bi≤di(i=1, 2, …, n), 则
γw([a1, b1], [a2, b2], …, [an, bn])≤γw([c1, d1], [c2, d2], …, [cn, dn]).
定义10 设[ai, bi](i=1, 2, …, n)为一组连续区间数, w=(w1, w2, …, wn)为加权向量, 且wj≥0, j=1, 2, …, n,
$ \eta :{\Omega ^n} \to {R^ + }, $ |
$ \begin{array}{*{20}{c}} {{\eta _\mathit{\boldsymbol{w}}}\left( {\left[ {{a_1},{b_1}} \right],\left[ {{a_2},{b_2}} \right], \cdots ,\left[ {{a_n},{b_n}} \right]} \right) = }\\ {\prod\limits_{j = 1}^n {{{\left( {{\varphi _{Q,f}}\left( {\left[ {{a_{\sigma \left( j \right)}},{b_{\sigma \left( j \right)}}} \right]} \right)} \right)}^{{w_j}}}} ,} \end{array} $ |
则称γ为有序加权连续QOWG算子, 简称为OWCQOWG算子, 其中φ为CQOWG算子, φQ, f([aσ(j), bσ(j)])为φQ, f ([ai, bi])(i=1, 2, …, n)中第j大的数.
不难证明, OWCQOWG算子具有下列性质:
定理17 设[ai, bi](i=1, 2, …, n)为一组连续区间数, w =(w1, w2, …, wn)为加权向量, 且wj≥0, j=1, 2, …, n,
(1) 幂等性
若ai=a, bi=b(i=1, 2, …, n), 则
ηw([a1, b1]), [a2, b2], …, [an, bn] =φQ, f([a, b]).
(2) 有界性
$ \mathop {\min }\limits_i \left\{ {{a_i}} \right\} \le {\eta _w}\left( {\left[ {{a_1},{b_1}} \right],\left[ {{a_2},{b_2}} \right], \cdots ,\left[ {{a_n},{b_n}} \right]} \right) \le \mathop {\max }\limits_i \left\{ {{b_i}} \right\}. $ |
(3) 单调性
设[ci, di](i=1, 2, …, n)为另一组连续区间数, 若ai≤ci, bi≤di(i=1, 2, …, n), 则
ηw([a1, b1], [a2, b2], …, [an, bn])≤ηw([c1, d1], [c2, d2], …, [cn, dn]).
(4) 置换不变性
设[ci, di](i=1, 2, …, n)为[ai, bi](i=1, 2, …, n)的任意一个置换, 则
ηw [a1, b1], [a2, b2], …, [an, bn] =
ηw [c1, d1], [c2, d2], …, [cn, dn].
定义11 设[ai, bi](i=1, 2, …, n)为一组连续区间数, 若函数
$ \rho :{\Omega ^n} \to {R^ + }, $ |
$ \begin{array}{*{20}{c}} {{\rho _\mathit{\boldsymbol{w}}}\left( {\left[ {{a_1},{b_1}} \right],\left[ {{a_2},{b_2}} \right], \cdots ,\left[ {{a_n},{b_n}} \right]} \right) = }\\ {\prod\limits_{j = 1}^n {{{\left( {{\pi _{Q,f}}\left( {\left[ {{a_{\sigma \left( j \right)}},{b_{\sigma \left( j \right)}}} \right]} \right)} \right)}^{{w_j}}}} ,} \end{array} $ |
则称ρ为组合连续QOWG算子, 简称CCQOWG算子, 其中, (σ(1), σ(2), …, σ(n))是(1, 2, …, n)的一个置换, 满足
$ \begin{array}{l} {\pi _{Q,f}}\left( {\left[ {{a_{\sigma \left( 1 \right)}},{b_{\sigma \left( 1 \right)}}} \right]} \right) \ge \\ \;\;\;\;\;\;\;{\pi _{Q,f}}\left( {\left[ {{a_{\sigma \left( 2 \right)}},{b_{\sigma \left( 2 \right)}}} \right]} \right) \ge \cdots \ge \\ \;\;\;\;\;\;\;{\pi _{Q,f}}\left( {\left[ {{a_{\sigma \left( n \right)}},{b_{\sigma \left( n \right)}}} \right]} \right), \end{array} $ |
即πQ, f([aσ(j), bσ(j)])为集合{(φQ, f([a1, b1]))nω1),(φQ, f([a2, b2]))nω2, …,(φQ, f([an, bn]))nωn}中第j大的数, φ为CQOWG算子, w=(w1, w2, …, wn)为CCQOWG算子相关联的加权向量, 且wj≥0, j=1, 2, …, n,
显然, 当
在使用COWG算子进行区间数信息集成的过程中, 决策者既可以通过选择不同的生成函数实现对决策结果的调整, 也可通过选择态度参数体现决策的主动性, 因此COWG算子在区间数信息集成中具有独特的理论和应用优势.下面提出基于CQOWG算子的区间数多属性群决策方法.
设X ={x1, x2, …, xm}为备选方案集, 属性集为U={u1, u2, …, un}, ω=(ω1, ω2, …, ωn)为属性权重向量, 且ωj≥0, j=1, 2, …, n,
步骤1 设决策者dk给出的方案xi在属性uj下的测度为连续区间数aij(k)=[aij(k)-, aij(k)+], 于是得到连续区间数决策矩阵M(k)=(aij(k))mn, k=1, 2, …, t, i=1, 2, …, m, j=1, 2, …, n.
步骤2 由于属性可以分为效益型I1和成本型I2两类, 需要将决策矩阵M(k)=(aij(k))mn规范为R(k)=(rij(k))mn, rij(k)=[rij(k)-, rij(k)+], 其中[28],
$ \begin{array}{l} r_{ij}^{\left( k \right) - } = \frac{{a_{ij}^{\left( k \right) - }}}{{\sqrt {\sum\limits_{i = 1}^m {{{\left( {a_{ij}^{\left( k \right) + }} \right)}^2}} } }},r_{ij}^{\left( k \right) + } = \frac{{a_{ij}^{\left( k \right) + }}}{{\sqrt {\sum\limits_{i = 1}^m {{{\left( {a_{ij}^{\left( k \right) - }} \right)}^2}} } }},\\ \;\;\;\;\;\;j \in {I_1},i = 1,2, \cdots ,m; \end{array} $ |
$ \begin{array}{l} r_{ij}^{\left( k \right) - } = \frac{{1/a_{ij}^{\left( k \right) + }}}{{\sqrt {\sum\limits_{i = 1}^m {{{\left( {1/a_{ij}^{\left( k \right) - }} \right)}^2}} } }},r_{ij}^{\left( k \right) + } = \frac{{1/a_{ij}^{\left( k \right) - }}}{{\sqrt {\sum\limits_{i = 1}^m {{{\left( {a_{ij}^{\left( k \right) + }} \right)}^2}} } }},\\ \;\;\;\;\;\;j \in {I_2},i = 1,2, \cdots ,m. \end{array} $ |
步骤3 利用CCQOWG算子, 将t个连续区间数决策矩阵集成为综合决策矩阵Z=(zij)mn, 其中,
$ \begin{array}{l} {z_{ij}} = \\ {\rho _\mathit{\boldsymbol{w}}}\left( {\left[ {r_{ij}^{\left( 1 \right) - },r_{ij}^{\left( 1 \right) + }} \right],\left[ {r_{ij}^{\left( 2 \right) - },r_{ij}^{\left( 2 \right) + }} \right], \cdots ,\left[ {r_{ij}^{\left( t \right) - },r_{ij}^{\left( t \right) + }} \right]} \right) = \\ \prod\limits_{k = 1}^t {{{\left( {{\pi _{Q,f}}\left( {\left[ {r_{ij}^{\sigma \left( k \right) - },r_{ij}^{\sigma \left( k \right) + }} \right]} \right)} \right)}^{{w_k}}}} ,\\ i = 1,2, \cdots ,m,j = 1,2, \cdots ,n. \end{array} $ |
步骤4 对综合决策矩阵Z=(zij)mn进行集成, 得到每个方案的综合属性值
步骤5 根据方案的综合属性值zi(ω)(i=1, 2, …, m)实现方案{x1, x2, …, xm}的择优排序.
例1[25] 某投资银行要选择一家企业进行投资, 现有4家企业{x1, x2, x3, x4}可供选择, 决策者通过4个属性指标来评价投资价值, 即u1:投资收益和负税率; u2:投资净输出率; u3:国际收益率; u4:环境污染程度, 其中属性u4为成本型指标, 其他属性为效益型指标, 属性权重向量为(0.30, 0.35, 0.15, 0.20).经过3位专家{d1, d2, d3}的评估, 建立了区间数决策矩阵M(k)=(aij(k))4×4, k=1, 2, 3, 专家权重向量为(0.4, 0.3, 0.3).下面根据专家提供的决策矩阵, 评价这4家企业的投资价值, 为该银行决策提供参考.
步骤2 将区间数决策矩阵M(k)规范化, 得到规范化决策矩阵R(k)(k=1, 2, 3).
$ \begin{array}{l} {\mathit{\boldsymbol{R}}^{\left( 1 \right)}} = \left( {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}} {\left[ {0.2537,0.5304} \right]}&{\left[ {0.3936,0.5704} \right]}\\ {\left[ {0.5286,0.8375} \right]}&{\left[ {0.4972,0.6944} \right]}\\ {\left[ {0.3594,0.6700} \right]}&{\left[ {0.3522,0.5208} \right]}\\ {\left[ {0.3171,0.5584} \right]}&{\left[ {0.4143,0.5952} \right]} \end{array}} \right.\\ \;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\left. {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}} {\left[ {0.4135,0.5904} \right]}&{\left[ {0.4488,0.5089} \right]}\\ {\left[ {0.3675,0.5904} \right]}&{\left[ {0.3876,0.4214} \right]}\\ {\left[ {0.4135,0.6467} \right]}&{\left[ {0.5443,0.5994} \right]}\\ {\left[ {0.4365,0.6186} \right]}&{\left[ {0.5016,0.5619} \right]} \end{array}} \right), \end{array} $ |
$ \begin{array}{l} {\mathit{\boldsymbol{R}}^{\left( 2 \right)}} = \left( {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}} {\left[ {0.2229,0.4761} \right]}&{\left[ {0.4180,0.6262} \right]}\\ {\left[ {0.4661,0.8122} \right]}&{\left[ {0.4180,0.7623} \right]}\\ {\left[ {0.4053,0.6721} \right]}&{\left[ {0.3762,0.5445} \right]}\\ {\left[ {0.3040,0.7562} \right]}&{\left[ {0.3135,0.6534} \right]} \end{array}} \right.\\ \;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\left. {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}} {\left[ {0.3371,0.6424} \right]}&{\left[ {0.4343,0.5522} \right]}\\ {\left[ {0.3852,0.5931} \right]}&{\left[ {0.3536,0.4314} \right]}\\ {\left[ {0.4334,0.5931} \right]}&{\left[ {0.4951,0.6135} \right]}\\ {\left[ {0.4575,0.6228} \right]}&{\left[ {0.4951,0.6135} \right]} \end{array}} \right), \end{array} $ |
$ \begin{array}{l} {\mathit{\boldsymbol{R}}^{\left( 3 \right)}} = \left( {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}} {\left[ {0.2810,0.7653} \right]}&{\left[ {0.3812,0.5762} \right]}\\ {\left[ {0.4683,0.4917} \right]}&{\left[ {0.4036,0.5238} \right]}\\ {\left[ {0.2810,0.6597} \right]}&{\left[ {0.4260,0.6024} \right]}\\ {\left[ {0.3559,0.5806} \right]}&{\left[ {0.4933,0.6285} \right]} \end{array}} \right.\\ \;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\left. {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}} {\left[ {0.4531,0.5897} \right]}&{\left[ {0.4961,0.5614} \right]}\\ {\left[ {0.2719,0.5897} \right]}&{\left[ {0.3898,0.4649} \right]}\\ {\left[ {0.4078,0.5897} \right]}&{\left[ {0.4787,0.5510} \right]}\\ {\left[ {0.4531,0.7021} \right]}&{\left[ {0.4625,0.5950} \right]} \end{array}} \right). \end{array} $ |
步骤3 利用CCQOWG算子, 求出综合决策矩阵:
$ \mathit{\boldsymbol{Z}} = \left( {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}} {0.4441}&{0.5588}&{0.5555}&{0.5432}\\ {0.6973}&{0.6081}&{0.5255}&{0.4434}\\ {0.5808}&{0.5217}&{0.5603}&{0.5863}\\ {0.5617}&{0.5575}&{0.5984}&{0.5886} \end{array}} \right). $ |
其中,
步骤4 方案综合属性值分别为
z1(ω)=0.518 2, z2(ω)=0.581 9,
z3(ω)=0.557 4, z4(ω)=0.570 9,
其中, 属性权重向量ω=(0.30, 0.35, 0.15, 0.20).
步骤5 根据方案综合属性值得到方案的排序为x2>x4>x3>x1, 即方案x2最优.
使用文献[25]中的CCQOWA算子, 计算得各方案综合属性值为z1(ω)=0.572 7, z2(ω)=0.654 9, z3(ω)=0.607 6, z4(ω)=0.622 0, 因此方案排序为x2>x4>x3>x1.
尽管各方案的综合属性值与使用本文中的CCQOWG算子得到的综合属性值不同, 但是方案的排序完全相同.这在一定程度上说明了使用本文的CCQOWG算子进行决策是有效的.
6 结语首先, 通过拓展QOWG算子, 提出了连续区间QOWG算子, 拓展了QOWG算子的应用范围, 研究了CQOWG算子的特殊情况和性质.其次, 定义了CQOWG算子的orness测度, 研究了orness测度的性质.然后, 定义了WCQOWG算子、OWCQOWG算子以及CCQOWG算子, 使得CQOWG算子可以处理多个连续区间数的集成问题, 讨论了这些算子的性质.最后, 提出了基于连续QOWG算子的多属性群决策方法, 并通过决策实例说明了其可行性和有效性.
[1] | HARASNYI J C. Cardinal welfare, individualistic ethics, and interpersonal comparisons of utility[J]. Journal of Political Economy, 1955, 63: 309–321. DOI:10.1086/257678 |
[2] | ACZEL J, ALSINA C. Synthesizing judgement:A functional equation approach[J]. Mathematical Modelling, 1987(9): 311–320. |
[3] | YAGER R R. On ordered weighted averaging aggregation operators in multicriteria decision making[J]. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 1988, 18: 183–190. DOI:10.1109/21.87068 |
[4] | HERRERA F, HERRERA V E, CHICLANA F. Multiperson decision-making based on multiplicative preference relations[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2001, 129: 372–385. DOI:10.1016/S0377-2217(99)00197-6 |
[5] |
陈华友, 刘春林, 盛昭翰. IOWHA算子及其在组合预测中的应用[J].
中国管理科学, 2004, 12(5): 35–40.
CHEN H Y, LIU C L, SHENG Z H. Induced ordered weighted harmonic averaging(IOWHA) operator and its application to combination forecasting method[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2004, 12(5): 35–40. |
[6] | YAGER R R. Generalized OWA aggregation operators[J]. Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, 2004(3): 93–107. |
[7] | FODOR J, MARICHAL J L, ROUBENS M. Characterization of the ordered weighted averaging operators[J]. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 1995, 3(2): 236–240. DOI:10.1109/91.388176 |
[8] |
刘卫锋, 常娟, 何霞. 广义毕达哥拉斯模糊集成算子及其决策应用[J].
控制与决策, 2016, 31(12): 2280–2286.
LIU W F, CHANG J, HE X. Generalized Pythagorean fuzzy aggregation operators and applications in decision making[J]. Control and Decision, 2016, 31(12): 2280–2286. |
[9] | XU Z S, DA Q L. The certain OWA operator[J]. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 2002, 17: 469–483. |
[10] | XU Y J, DA Q L. Approach to obtaining weights of uncertain ordered weighted geometric averaging operator[J]. Journal of Southeast University(English Edition), 2008, 24(1): 110–113. |
[11] | XU Z S, CAI X Q. Uncertain power average operators for aggregating interval fuzzy preference relations[J]. Group Decision and Negotiation, 2012, 21: 381–397. DOI:10.1007/s10726-010-9213-7 |
[12] | MERIGÍ J M, GIL-LAFUENTE A M, MARTORELL O. Uncertain induced aggregation operators and its application in tourism management[J]. Expert Systems with Application, 2012, 39: 869–880. DOI:10.1016/j.eswa.2011.07.085 |
[13] | MERIGÍJ M, CASANOVAS M. The uncertain induced quasi-arithmetic OWA operator[J]. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 2011, 26: 1–24. DOI:10.1002/int.v26:1 |
[14] | RAN L G, WEI G W. Uncertain prioritized operators and their application to multiple attribute group decision making[J]. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 2015, 21(1): 118–139. DOI:10.3846/20294913.2014.979454 |
[15] | YAGER R R. OWA aggregation over a continuous interval argument with applications to decision making[J]. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B, 2004, 34: 1952–1963. DOI:10.1109/TSMCB.2004.831154 |
[16] | YAGER R R, XU Z S. The continuous ordered weighted geometric operator and its application to decision making[J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 2006, 157: 1393–1402. DOI:10.1016/j.fss.2005.12.001 |
[17] | XU Z S. A C-OWA operator-Based approach to decision making with interval fuzzy preference relation[J]. Intenational Journal of Intelligent Systems, 2006, 21: 1289–1298. DOI:10.1002/(ISSN)1098-111X |
[18] |
徐泽水. 拓展的C-OWA算子及其在不确定多属性决策中的应用[J].
系统工程理论与实践, 2005, 25(11): 7–13.
XU Z S. Extended C-OWA operators and their use in uncertain multi-attribute decision making[J]. Systems Engineering Theory and Practice, 2005, 25(11): 7–13. DOI:10.3321/j.issn:1000-6788.2005.11.002 |
[19] |
龚艳冰, 梁雪春. 基于模糊C-OWA算子的模糊多属性决策方法[J].
系统工程与电子技术, 2008, 30(8): 1478–1480.
GONG Y B, LIANG X C. Fuzzy multi-attribute decision making method based on fuzzy C-OWA operator[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2008, 30(8): 1478–1480. |
[20] |
汪新凡. 基于CC-OWG算子的区间数多属性群决策方法[J].
湖南工业大学学报, 2009, 23(1): 28–33.
WANG X F. Group decision making method of interval multiple attribute based on CC-OWG operator[J]. Journal of Hunan University of Technology, 2009, 23(1): 28–33. |
[21] |
丁德臣, 龚艳冰, 何建敏. 基于模糊C-OWG算子的模糊DEA模型求解[J].
模糊系统与数学, 2009, 23(2): 131–135.
DING D C, GONG Y B, HE J M. Solution of fuzzy DEA model based on fuzzy C-OWG operator[J]. Fuzzy Systems and Mathematics, 2009, 23(2): 131–135. |
[22] | WU J, LI J C, DUAN W Q. The induced continuous ordered weighted geometric operator and their application in group decision making[J]. Computer and Industrial Engineering, 2009, 56: 1545–1552. DOI:10.1016/j.cie.2008.09.041 |
[23] |
陈华友, 刘金培, 王慧. 一类连续区间数据的有序加权调和(C-OWH)平均算子及其应用[J].
系统工程理论与实践, 2008, 28(7): 86–92.
CHEN H Y, LIU J P, WANG H. A class of continuous ordered weighted harmonic(C-OWH) averaging operators for interval argument and its applications[J]. Systems Engineering Theory and Practice, 2008, 28(7): 86–92. |
[24] | ZHOU L G, CHEN H Y. Continuous generalized OWA operator and its application to decision making[J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 2011, 168: 18–34. DOI:10.1016/j.fss.2010.05.009 |
[25] | LIU J P, LIN S, CHEN H Y, et al. The continuous Quasi-OWA operator and its application to group decision making[J]. Group Decision and Negotiation, 2013, 22: 715–738. DOI:10.1007/s10726-012-9288-4 |
[26] | LIU X W. An orness measure for quasi-arithmetic means[J]. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 2006, 14(6): 837–848. DOI:10.1109/TFUZZ.2006.879990 |
[27] | LIU X W. The orness measures for two compound quasi-arithmetic mean aggregation operators[J]. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 2010, 51: 305–334. DOI:10.1016/j.ijar.2009.10.003 |
[28] |
徐泽水, 孙在东. 一类不确定型多属性决策问题的排序方法[J].
管理科学学报, 2002, 5(3): 35–39.
XU Z S, SUN Z D. Priority method for a kind of multi-attribute decision-making problems[J]. Journal of Management Sciences in China, 2002, 5(3): 35–39. |