Please wait a minute...
浙江大学学报(理学版)  2020, Vol. 47 Issue (5): 624-629    DOI: 10.3785/j.issn.1008-9497.2020.05.014
环境科学     
泉州湾滨海退化湿地红树林修复工程对土壤酶活性的影响
李云桑1, 党玮1, 郭沛涌1,2, 洪怡萍1, 单子轩1, 万媛宁1, 陈晓霞1, 邓俊1,2
1.华侨大学 化工学院 环境科学与工程系,福建 厦门 361021
2.华侨大学 环境与资源技术研究所,福建 厦门 361021
Effects of mangrove restoration on the soil enzyme activity at Quanzhou bay degraded coastal wetland
LI Yunsang1, DANG Wei1, GUO Peiyong1,2, HONG Yiping1, SHAN Zixuan1, WAN Yuanning1, CHEN Xiaoxia1, DENG Jun1,2
1.Department of Environmental Science and Engineering,School of Chemical Engineering,Huaqiao University, Xiamen 361021,Fujian Province,China
2.Institute of Environmental and Resource Technology,Huaqiao University, Xiamen 361021, Fujian Province,China
 全文: PDF(1003 KB)   HTML  
摘要: 以泉州湾滨海退化湿地为对象,通过野外调查、采样、实验室分析,初步研究红树林修复工程对土壤酶活性的影响。结果表明,退化湿地修复前土壤磷酸酶和脲酶活性分别为8.78~17.72 μg/(g?24 h)和45.86~80.12 μg/(g?24 h),修复后土壤磷酸酶和脲酶活性分别为10.21~14.22 μg/(g?24 h)和85.83~102.22 μg/(g?24 h)。在秋茄+桐花树+红海榄修复模式下,土壤磷酸酶和脲酶活性均明显增高;在秋茄+桐花树+白骨壤修复模式下,土壤磷酸酶活性明显降低,脲酶活性有一定增高;在秋茄+桐花树+木榄修复模式下,土壤磷酸酶和脲酶活性变化均不明显。
关键词: 磷酸酶脲酶修复模式湿地修复    
Abstract: This study focuses on analysing the effect of different combinations of mangrove plants on soil restoration using field investigation,sampling,and laboratory analysis methods.Quanzhou bay degraded coastal wetland are examined. Results show that the enzyme activity of phosphatase and urease before restoration at degraded wetland are in the range of 8.78~17.72 μg/(g?24 h) and 45.86~80.12 μg/(g?24 h) ,respectively,these numbers increase to 10.21~14.22 μg/(g?24 h) and 85.83~102.22 μg/(g?24 h) after restoration.Concretely on different plant combinations restoration,Kandelia obovata+Aegiceras corniculatum+Rhizophora stylosa result in the most substantial boost in soil enzyme activity.Kandelia obovata+Aegiceras corniculatum+Avicennia marina makes the phosphatase less active,while enhancing urease activity.Kandelia obovata+Aegiceras corniculatum+Bruguiera gymnorrhiza does not make a significant difference in enzyme activity.
Key words: restoration    phosphatase    urease    wetland restoration
收稿日期: 2019-09-18 出版日期: 2020-09-25
CLC:  X5  
基金资助: 国家自然科学基金资助项目(20777021);福建省自然科学基金资助项目(2017J01018);泉州市重点科技项目(2014Z110,2018Z003);晋江市重点科技项目(2013S002).
通讯作者: ORCID://orcid.org/0000-0003-4623-5705,E-mail:guopeiyong@sina.com.     E-mail: guopeiyong@sina.com
作者简介: 李云桑(1998—),ORCID://orcid.org/0000-0002-0123-9262,女,学士,主要从事环境生态研究,E-mail:654002756@qq.com.。
服务  
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章  
李云桑
党玮
郭沛涌
洪怡萍
单子轩
万媛宁
陈晓霞
邓俊

引用本文:

李云桑, 党玮, 郭沛涌, 洪怡萍, 单子轩, 万媛宁, 陈晓霞, 邓俊. 泉州湾滨海退化湿地红树林修复工程对土壤酶活性的影响[J]. 浙江大学学报(理学版), 2020, 47(5): 624-629.

LI Yunsang, DANG Wei, GUO Peiyong, HONG Yiping, SHAN Zixuan, WAN Yuanning, CHEN Xiaoxia, DENG Jun. Effects of mangrove restoration on the soil enzyme activity at Quanzhou bay degraded coastal wetland. Journal of Zhejiang University (Science Edition), 2020, 47(5): 624-629.

链接本文:

https://www.zjujournals.com/sci/CN/10.3785/j.issn.1008-9497.2020.05.014        https://www.zjujournals.com/sci/CN/Y2020/V47/I5/624

1 CUI L L,LI G S,OUYANG N L,et al.Analyzing coastal wetland degradation and its key restoration technologies in the coastal area of Jiangsu,China[J].Wetlands,2018,38(3):525-537. DOI: 10.1007/s13157-018-0997-6
2 SUBHAJIT D,DIPNARAYAN G,ABHISHEK M,et al.Soil urease activity of sundarban mangrove ecosystem,India[J]. Advances in Microbiology,2017,7(8): 617-632. DOI: 10.4236/aim.2017.78048
3 赵兰坡,姜岩.土壤磷酸酶活性测定方法的探讨[J].土壤通报,1986,17(3):138-141. ZHAO L P,JIANG Y.A study on the method for determining soil phosphatase activity[J].Chinese Journal of Soil Science,1986,17(3):138-141.
4 关松荫.土壤酶及其研究法[M].北京:农业出版社,1986: 274-297. GUAN S Y.Soil Enzyme and Its Research Methods[M]. Beijing: Agriculture Press,1986.
5 LYU X X,SONG J M,LI X G,et al.Geochemical characteristics of nitrogen in the southern Yellow Sea surface sediments[J].Journal of Marine Systems,2004,56(1):17-27. DOI: 10.1007/s11783-011-0280-z
6 LU D,GUO P Y,JI J F,et al.Evaluation of phosphorus distribution and bioavailability in sediments of a subtropical wetland reserve in southeast China[J].Ecological Indicators,2016,66:556-563. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.02.015
7 SU H T,GUO P Y,ZHANG Y X,et al.Effects of planting patterns on the concentration and bioavailability of heavy metals in soils during wetland restoration[J].International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology,2019,16:853-864. DOI: 10.1007/s13762-018-1724-9
8 SONG Y Y,SONG C C,YANG G S,et al. Changes in labile organic carbon fractions and soil enzyme activities after marshland reclamation and restoration in the Sanjiang Plain in Northeast China[J].Environmental Management,2012,50(3):418-426. DOI: 10.1007/s00267-012-9890-x
9 ZHANG X Y,DONG W Y,DAI X Q,et al.Responses of absolute and specific soil enzyme activities to long term additions of organic and mineral fertilizer[J].Science of the Total Environment,2015,536: 59-67. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.07.043
10 WANG Q B,LI Y C,ZHANG M.Soil recovery across a chronosequence of restored wetlands in the Florida Everglades[J].Scientific Reports,2015(5):17630. DOI: 10.1038/srep17630
11 王树起,韩晓增,乔云发,等.不同土地利用方式对三江平原湿地土壤酶分布特征及相关肥力因子的影响[J].水土保持学报,2007,21(4):150-153,192. DOI:10.3321/j.issn:1009-2242.2007.04.035 WANG S Q,HAN X Z,QIAO Y F,et al.Characteristics of soil enzyme activity and fertility under different types of land use in wetland of Sanjiang Plain[J].Journal of Soil and Water Conservation,2007,21(4):150-153,192. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1009-2242.2007.04.035
12 WU Y Y,ZHOU G Y,ZHAO K,et al.Differential distribution of metals and enzymes in Quanzhou Bay Estuarine wetland soils under three mangrove species[J].Soil and Sediment Contamination:An International Journal,2016,25(1):75-88. DOI: 10.1080/15320383.2016.1088509
13 杨刚,谢永宏,陈心胜,等.洞庭湖区退田还湖后不同恢复模式下土壤酶活性的变化[J].应用生态学报,2009,20(9):2187-2192. YANG G,XIE Y H,CHEN X S,et al.Soil enzyme activities under different restoration modes after returning farmland to lake in Dongting Lake area[J].Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology,2009,20(9):2187-2192.
14 SARDANS J,PEÑUELAS J.Drought decreases soil enzyme activity in a Mediterranean holm oak forest[J].Soil Biol Biochem ,2005,37(3): 455-461.
15 姜经梅,赵慧,沈铭能,等.长江口潮滩表层沉积物中碱性磷酸酶活性及其影响因素[J].环境科学学报,2011,31(10):2233-2239. DOI: 10.1631/jzus.A10 10009 JIANG J M,ZHAO H,SHEN M N,et al. Distribution and impact factor of alkaline phosphatase activity in the intertidal surface sediments of the Yangtze Estuary[J].Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae,2011,31(10):2233-2239. DOI: 10.1631/jzus.A10 10009
16 杨君珑,李小伟,曹兵,等.六盘山生态移民迁出区不同植被恢复模式对土壤养分和土壤酶活性的影响[J].西南林业大学学报(自然科学),2018,38(5):13-19. DOI: 10.11929/j.issn.2095-1914.2018.05.003 YANG J L,LI X W,CAO B,et al. Effects of different vegetation restoration models on soil fertility and enzyme activity in eco-emigration area of Liupanshan[J]. Journal of Southwest Forestry University(Natural Sciences),2018,38(5):13-19. DOI: 10.11929/j.issn.2095-1914. 2018.05.003
17 SUDIPTA T,ASHIS C,KALYAN C,et al.Enzyme activities and microbial biomass in coastal soils of India[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry,2007,39(11): 2840-2848. DOI: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2007.05.027
18 SELVARAJ V,VELU K S.Comparison of enzyme activity with depth under tea plantations and forested sites in south India[J].Geoderma,2006,137(1/2): 212-216.
19 JOANA F,BERNARDO D,ISABEL C.Biogeo-chemical drivers of phosphatase activity in salt marsh sediments[J].Journal of Sea Research,2014,93(10): 57-62. DOI: 10.1016/j.seares.2014.04.002
20 解雪峰,濮励杰,王琪琪,等.滨海滩涂围垦区不同围垦年限土壤酶活性变化及其与理化性质关系[J].环境科学,2018,39(3):1404-1412. DOI: 10.13227/j.hjkx. 201707223 XIE X F,PU L J,WANG Q Q,et al. Response of soil enzyme activities and their relationships with physicochemical properties to different aged coastal reclamation areas,Eastern China[J].Environmental Science,2018,39(3):1404-1412. DOI: 10.13227/j.hjkx. 201707223
21 ALISON R M,BENJAMIN Z H.Nitrogen inputs accelerate phosphorus cycling rates across a wide variety of terrestrial ecosystems[J].New Phytologist,2012,193(3): 696-704.
22 齐继薇,刘长发,刘远,等.双台河口潮滩湿地不同植被沉积物脲酶、蛋白酶、磷酸酶活性及其与氮、磷含量关系[J].水生态学杂志,2014,35(4):1-7. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-3075.2014.04.001 QI J W,LIU C F,LIU Y,et al. Activities of urease,protease,phosphatase and their relationships with contents of nitrogen and phosphorus in sediments of tidal flat wetland vegetation of Shuangtai Estuary[J].Journal of Hydroecology,2014,35(4):1-7. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-3075.2014.04.001
23 朱芸芸,李敏,曲博,等.湿地植物根际土壤磷酸酶活性变化规律研究[J].环境科学与技术,2016,39(10):106-112.
[1] 王玥, 胡义波, 姜乃澄. 氨态氮、亚硝态氮对罗氏沼虾免疫相关酶类的影响[J]. 浙江大学学报(理学版), 2016, 43(7): 698-705.
[2] 王玥, 胡义波, 姜乃澄. 氨态氮、亚硝态氮对罗氏沼虾免疫相关酶类的影响[J]. 浙江大学学报(理学版), 2005, 32(6): 698-705.