Please wait a minute...
浙江大学学报（理学版）
浙江大学学报（理学版）  2020, Vol. 47 Issue (3): 337-344    DOI: 10.3785/j.issn.1008-9497.2020.03.011
数学与计算机科学     
考虑决策者后悔规避的瓦斯爆炸案例决策方法
郑晶1,2, 张恺3
1.福建江夏学院 电子信息科学学院，福建 福州 350108
2.福州大学 决策科学研究所，福建 福州 350116
3.福建船政交通职业学院 信息工程系，福建 福州 350007
Case-based decision method for gas explosion considering decision maker's regret aversion
ZHENG Jing1,2, ZHANG Kai3
1.College of Electronics and Information Science, Fujian Jiangxia University, Fuzhou 350108, China
2.Decision Sciences Institute, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou 350116, China
3.Department of Information Engineering, Fujian Chuanzheng Communications College, Fuzhou 350007,China
 全文: PDF(505 KB)   HTML  
摘要： 针对案例决策中决策者存在心理行为的问题，提出了一种考虑决策者后悔规避的瓦斯爆炸案例决策方法。首先，在案例属性相似度计算中，将问题属性拓展到符号型数据、精确数、区间数、三角模糊数、多粒度语言变量和直觉模糊数6种类型。然后，在测算属性相似度的感知效用时，考虑决策者对属性相似度的后悔规避心理行为，通过加权求和计算案例相似度。进一步，计算案例实施效果的感知效用，再通过集结案例相似度和实施效果的感知效用得到综合感知效用，并依据综合感知效用大小生成最优的备选方案。最后通过一个算例，说明该方法的可行性和有效性。
关键词： 后悔理论;  相似度;  案例推理;  后悔值;  感知效用    
Abstract: In order to solve the problem of the decision makers’ psychological behavior in case-based decision, a case-based decision method for gas explosion considering decision maker’s regret aversion is proposed. Firstly, for the calculation of case similarity, the problem attributes are expanded to six types, including symbol data, crisp data, interval data, triangular fuzzy number, multi-granularity linguistic variable and intuitionistic fuzzy number. The perceived utility is then calculated based on the consideration of the decision maker’s regret aversion, and the case similarity is evaluated by weighted summation. Furthermore, the perceived utility of alternative implementations is calculated, and the comprehensive perceived utility is gained by integrating the perceived utility of case similarity with the perceived utility of alternative implementations. On the basis of the above, the optimal alternative is generated according to the comprehensive perceived utility. Finally, an illustrative example is provided which shows the validity and feasibility of the proposed method .
Key words: similarity    perceived utility    regret theory    regret value    case-based reasoning
收稿日期: 2018-09-13 出版日期: 2020-06-25
CLC:  C931  
基金资助: 教育部人文社科基金项目（20YJC630229);福建省社会科学规划项目（FJ2019B079)；教育部科技发展中心产学研创新基金项目（2018A01019).
作者简介: 郑晶(1980—), ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2785-0342，女, 博士, 教授, 主要从事决策理论与方法及应急决策研究，E-mail：zhengjing80@qq.com.
服务　　
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章　　
郑晶
张恺

引用本文:

郑晶, 张恺. 考虑决策者后悔规避的瓦斯爆炸案例决策方法[J]. 浙江大学学报（理学版）, 2020, 47(3): 337-344.

ZHENG Jing, ZHANG Kai. Case-based decision method for gas explosion considering decision maker's regret aversion. Journal of Zhejiang University (Science Edition), 2020, 47(3): 337-344.

链接本文:

https://www.zjujournals.com/sci/CN/10.3785/j.issn.1008-9497.2020.03.011    或    https://www.zjujournals.com/sci/CN/Y2020/V47/I3/337

1 FAN Z P, LI Y H, WANG X H, et al. Hybrid similarity measure for case retrieval in CBR and its application to emergency response towards gas explosion[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2014, 41(5): 2526-2534.DOI:10.1016/j.eswa.2013.09.051
2 崔晓兰, 蔡淑琴, 冯进展. 基于本体的通信服务网络抱怨案例相似度计算[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2017, 37(6): 1638-1647.DOI:10.12011/1000-6788(2017)06-1638-10 CUI X L, CAI S Q, FENG J Z. Ontology-based similarity measurement for online complaint cases of communications services[J]. Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice, 2017, 37(6): 1638-1647.DOI:10.12011/1000-6788(2017)06-1638-10
3 QI J, HU J, PENG Y H. A modularized case adaptation method of case-based reasoning in parametric machinery design[J]. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 2017, 64:352-366. DOI:10.1016/j.engappai.2017.06.008
4 李永海, 樊治平, 袁媛. 考虑应急方案实施效果的突发事件应急方案生成方法[J]. 控制与决策, 2014, 29(2):275-280. DOI:10.13195/j.kzyjc.2013.0091 LI Y H, FAN Z P, YUAN Y. Method for generating emergency alternative with considering implementation effects of emergency alternatives[J]. Control and Decision, 2014,29(2): 275-280.DOI:10.13195/j.kzyjc.2013.0091
5 韩菁, 叶顺心, 柴建, 等. 基于后悔理论的混合型多属性案例决策方法[J]. 中国管理科学, 2016, 24(12): 108-116.DOI:10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2016.12.013 HAN J, YE S X, CHAI J, et al. Case-based decision analysis method based on regret theory for hybrid multiple attributes decision making[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2016, 24(12): 108-116. DOI:10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2016.12.013
6 GU D X, LIANG C Y, ZHAO H M. A case-based reasoning system based on weighted heterogeneous value distance metric for breast cancer diagnosis[J]. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, 2017, 77(C): 31-47. DOI:10.1016/j.artmed.2017.02.003
7 郑晶,王应明,张恺. 基于交叉效率的应急案例检索方法[J]. 控制与决策,2018,33(11): 128-133.DOI:10.13195/j.kzyjc.2017.0785 ZHENG J, WANG Y M, ZHANG K. Emergency case retrieval method based on cross-efficiency[J]. Control and Decision,2018,33(11): 128-133. DOI:10.13195/j.kzyjc.2017.0785
8 ZHENG J, WANG Y M, CHEN S Q. Dynamic case retrieval method with subjective preferences and objective information for emergency decision making[J]. IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica, 2018, 5(3): 749-757.
9 YAN A J, SHAO H S, GUO Z. Weight optimization for case-based reasoning using membrane computing[J]. Information Sciences, 2014, 287: 109-120.DOI:10.1016/j.ins.2014.07.043
10 严爱军, 钱丽敏, 王普. 案例推理属性权重的分配模型比较研究[J]. 自动化学报, 2014, 40(9):1896-1902.DOI:10.3724/SP.J.1004.2014.01896 YAN A J, QIAN L M, WANG P. A comparative study of attribute weights assignment for case-based reasoning[J]. Acta Automatic Sinica, 2014, 40(9): 1896-1902. DOI:10.3724/SP.J.1004.2014.01896
11 郑晶, 王应明, 陈圣群. 考虑方案有效性的应急案例决策方法[J]. 控制与决策, 2016, 31(10): 1824-1830.DOI:10.13195/j.kzyjc.2015.1102 ZHENG J, WANG Y M, CHEN S Q. Decision method for emergency case with considering effectiveness of alternative[J]. Control and Decision, 2016, 31(10): 1824-1830.DOI:10.13195/j.kzyjc.2015.1102
12 YU F, LI X Y, HAN X S. Risk response for urban water supply network using case-based reasoning during a natural disaster[J]. Safety Science, 2018, 106: 121-139. DOI:10.1016/j.ssci.2018.03.003
13 王宁, 谢晓珊, 刘海园. 基于案例的突发事件推演规则验证方法[J]. 系统工程学报, 2019, 34(2): 145-157. DOI:10.13383/j.cnki.jse.2019.02.001 WANG N, XIE X S, LIU H Y. Validation method of emergency deduction rules based on cases[J]. Journal of Systems Engineering, 2019, 34(2): 145-157. DOI:10.13383/j.cnki.jse.2019.02.001
14 WANG L, WANG Y M, MARTÍNEZ L. A group decision method based on prospect theory for emergency situations[J]. Information Sciences, 2017, 418-419: 119-135.DOI:10.1016/j.ins.2017.07.037
15 KAHNEMAN D, TVERSKY K A. Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk[J]. Econometrica, 1979, 47(2): 263-292.
16 BELL D E. Regret in decision making under uncertainty[J]. Operations Research, 1982, 30(5): 961-981. DOI:10.1287/opre.30.5.961
17 LOOMES G, SUGDEN R. Regret theory: An alternative theory of rational choice under uncertainty [J]. Economic Journal, 1982, 92(368): 805-824. DOI:10.2307/2232669
18 LIANG H M, XIONG W, DONG Y C. A prospect theory-based method for fusing the individual preference-approval structures in group decision making[J]. Computers & Industrial Engineering , 2018, 117(C): 237-248.DOI:10.1016/j.cie.2018.01.001
19 ZHANG S T, ZHU J J, LIU X D, et al. Regret theory-based group decision-making with multidimensional preference and incomplete weight information[J]. Information Fusion, 2016, 31(C):1-13. DOI:10.1016/j.inffus.2015.12.001
20 郑晶, 王应明, 蓝以信. 考虑决策者心理行为的多时期应急决策方法[J]. 系统科学与数学, 2015, 35(5):545-555. DOI:10.1016/j.aca.2009.12.043 ZHENG J, WANG Y M, LAN Y X. An approach to multiperiod emergency decision-making with consideration of the decision maker’s psychological behavior[J]. Journal of Systems Science and Mathematical Sciences, 2015, 35(5):545-555.DOI:10.1016/j.aca.2009.12.043
21 张晓, 樊治平, 陈发动. 基于后悔理论的风险型多属性决策方法[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2013, 33(9): 2313-2320. DOI:10.12011/1000-6788(2013)9-2313 ZHANG X, FAN Z P, CHEN F D. Method for risky multiple attribute decision making based on regret theory[J]. Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice, 2013, 33(9):2313-2320.DOI:10.12011/1000-6788(2013)9-2313
22 XIA M M. A hesitant fuzzy linguistic multi-criteria decision-making approach based on regret theory[J]. International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 2018, 20(7): 2135-2143. DOI:10.1007/s40815-018-0502-7
23 HERRERA F, MARTINEZ L. A 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic representation model for computing with words[J]. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 2000, 8(6): 746-752. DOI:10.1109/91.890332
24 QUIGGIN J. Regret theory with general choice sets[J]. Journal of Risk & Uncertainty, 1994, 8(2): 153-165. DOI:10.1007/BF01065370
[1] 王波, 惠小静, 鲁星. 谓词逻辑系统MTL∀中公式的公理化真度[J]. 浙江大学学报（理学版）, 2022, 49(5): 521-526.
[2] 华维灿,孙刚,王贵君. 基于概率犹豫模糊相似度的交互式群体决策方法[J]. 浙江大学学报（理学版）, 2022, 49(4): 398-407.
[3] 胡东滨,冯婧瑜,杨艺,易国栋. 考虑处置效果的苯系物泄露应急方案生成方法[J]. 浙江大学学报（理学版）, 2022, 49(4): 457-466.
[4] 吕欣, 程雨夏. 基于语义相似度与XGBoost算法的英语作文智能评价框架研究[J]. 浙江大学学报（理学版）, 2020, 47(3): 329-336.
[5] 李铭洋, 李博, 曹萍萍, 霍春辉. 考虑双方主体失望-欣喜感知的多指标双边匹配决策方法[J]. 浙江大学学报（理学版）, 2018, 45(2): 169-179.
[6] 陈永佩, 杜震洪, 刘仁义, 张丰, 王炼刚. 一种引入实体的地理语义相似度混合计算模型[J]. 浙江大学学报（理学版）, 2018, 45(2): 196-204.
[7] 何敬, 刘仁义, 张丰, 杜震洪, 陈永佩. 基于特征点群相似度计算模型的图像表示方法[J]. 浙江大学学报（理学版）, 2017, 44(5): 599-605.
[8] 郑晶, 王应明, 陈圣群. 应急决策中基于问题与解关系的案例调整方法[J]. 浙江大学学报（理学版）, 2016, 43(5): 560-566.