Please wait a minute...
J Zhejiang Univ (Med Sci)  2020, Vol. 49 Issue (3): 315-323    DOI: 10.3785/j.issn.1008-9292.2020.05.01
    
Comparative analysis of structural characteristics and epitopes in S proteins between SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV
LUN Yongzhi*(),LIU Ben,DONG Wen,SUN Jie,PAN Linghong
Key Laboratory of Medical Microecology(Putian University), Fujian Province University, School of Pharmacy and Medical Technology, Putian University, Putian 351100, Fujian Province, China
Download: HTML( 12 )   PDF(15104KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      

Abstract  

Objective: To provide data support for the study of pathogenic mechanism of SARS-CoV-2 at the molecular level, and provide suitable candidate targets for vaccine, antibody and drug research and development through comparative analysis for structural characteristics and epitopes of S protein of SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV. Methods: Based on the reference sequences of S protein, physical and chemical properties, hydrophobicity, signal peptide, transmembrane region, domain, secondary structure, tertiary structure analysis and antigenic epitopes prediction were carried out. Meanwhile, the tissue expression, related pathways and reactome pathways of angiotensis Ⅰ converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) and C-type lectin domain family 4 member M (CLEC4M) receptors were analyzed. Results: The amino acid sequence of S protein of SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV has a 75.80% consistency. The structural characteristics of the two coronaviruses are highly consistent, but the secondary structure and tertiary structure of SARS-CoV-2 is not as obvious as SARS-CoV. ACE2 and CLEC4M are expressed in alimentary system, heart, kidney, lung and placenta. The main related the pathways of renin-angiotensin system, protein digestion and absorption pathway, and the reactome pathways of metabolism of angiotensinogen to angiotensins, GPCR ligand binding, are related to typical symptoms of coronavirus disease 2019 induced by SARS-CoV-2. Three pairs of highly or completely homologous epitopes of S protein were obtained. The 600-605, 695-703 and 888-896 amino acid residues in SARS-CoV-2 were highly homologous with 586-591, 677-685 and 870-878 amino acid residues in SARS-CoV, respectively. Conclusions: The similarity of S protein of SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV determines that they have similar infection patterns and clinical manifestations. The candidate epitopes with high reliability can provide reference for virus diagnosis and vaccine development.



Key wordsSevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2      S protein      Structural characteristic      Epitope     
Received: 16 April 2020      Published: 10 June 2020
CLC:  R373.1  
Corresponding Authors: LUN Yongzhi     E-mail: lunyz@163.com
Cite this article:

LUN Yongzhi,LIU Ben,DONG Wen,SUN Jie,PAN Linghong. Comparative analysis of structural characteristics and epitopes in S proteins between SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV. J Zhejiang Univ (Med Sci), 2020, 49(3): 315-323.

URL:

http://www.zjujournals.com/med/10.3785/j.issn.1008-9292.2020.05.01     OR     http://www.zjujournals.com/med/Y2020/V49/I3/315


两种严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒S蛋白结构特征及抗原表位比较

目的: 通过严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒(SARS-CoV)-2与SARS-CoV S蛋白结构特征及抗原表位的比较分析,从分子水平为SARS-CoV-2致病机制研究提供数据支持,并为疫苗、抗体及药物研发寻找合适的候选靶点。方法: 利用生物信息学方法和工具,基于S蛋白参考序列进行理化性质、疏水性、信号肽、跨膜区、结构域、二级结构、三级结构分析及抗原表位预测,同时对受体血管紧张素转换酶2(ACE2)、C型凝集素(CLEC4M)的组织表达及关联通路、途径进行分析。结果: SARS-CoV-2、SARS-CoV S蛋白氨基酸序列一致性为75.80%,两者结构特征具有较高一致性,但SARS-CoV-2高级结构特征不如SARS-CoV明显。受体ACE2、CLEC4M在消化系统及心脏、肾脏、肺、胎盘中均有表达,主要关联的肾素-血管紧张素系统、蛋白质消化吸收通路及血管紧张素前体转化、G蛋白偶联受体(GPCR)配体结合途径与2019冠状病毒病典型症状相关。分析获得S蛋白三对高度或完全同源的抗原表位,即SARS-CoV-2 S蛋白第600~605位氨基酸残基与SARS-CoV第586~591位高度一致,SARS-CoV-2 S蛋白第695~703位、第888~896位氨基酸残基分别与SARS-CoV第677~685位、第870~878位高度或完全一致。结论: SARS-CoV-2与SARS-CoV S蛋白结构上的相似性决定了两者具有相近的感染模式和临床表现。筛选获得的高可信度的SARS-CoV-2候选抗原表位可为病毒诊断和疫苗研制提供参考。


关键词: 严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2,  S蛋白,  结构特征,  抗原表位 
冠状病毒 相对分子质量 理论等电点 不稳定系数 平均亲水值
SARS-CoV:严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒.
SARS-CoV-2 141 179 6.24 33.01 -0.079
SARS-CoV 139 109 5.56 32.42 -0.043
Tab 1 Physicochemical properties of S protein in SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV
Fig 1 Hydrophobicity of S protein in SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV
冠状病毒 信号肽 细胞外区 跨膜区 细胞质区
SARS-CoV:严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒.
SARS-CoV-2 1~15 16~1213 1214~1236 1237~1273
SARS-CoV 1~13 14~1195 1196~1216 1217~1255
Tab 2 Structural functional domain of S protein in SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV
Fig 2 Structural features of the amino acid sequence of S protein in SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV
Fig 3 Tertiary structure of S protein in SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV
Fig 4 Multiple alignment of the amino acid sequences of S protein in SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV
Fig 5 Expression level of receptor proteins ACE2 and CLEC4M in normal human tissues
Fig 6 Interacting proteins of ACE2, CLEC4M and DPP4 involved in pathways and reactome pathways
冠状病毒 起止位置 氨基酸序列
*高度同源抗原表位序列.SARS-CoV:严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒.
SARS-CoV-2 73~78 TNGTKR
250~260 TPGDSSSGWTA
525~529 CGPKK
600~605 PGTNTS*
676~683 TQTNSPRR
807~814 PDPSKPSK
SARS-CoV 25~33 VQAPNYTQH
396~400 QIAPG
428~435 IDATSTGN
560~566 DSVRDPK
586~591 PGTNAS*
791~794 PLKP
Tab 3 Comparison of B cell epitopes of S protein in SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV
冠状病毒 起止位置 氨基酸序列
*高度同源抗原表位序列.SARS-CoV:严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒.
SARS-CoV-2 695~703 YTMSLGAEN*
888~896 FGAGAALQI*
SARS-CoV 677~685 YTMSLGADS*
870~878 FGAGAALQI*
Tab 4 Comparisonof Th epitopes of S protein in SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV
Fig 7 Spatial locations of S protein epitopes in SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV
[1]   HUI D , ZUMLA A . Severe acute respiratory syndrome:historical, epidemiologic, and clinical features[J]. Infect Dis Clin North Am, 2019, 33 (4): 869- 889
doi: 10.1016/j.idc.2019.07.001
[2]   赵琪, 饶子和 . 冠状病毒蛋白结构基因组研究进展[J]. 生物物理学报, 2010, 26 (1): 14- 25
ZHAO Qi , RAO Zihe . Progress of structural genomics study on coronaviruse[J]. Acta Biophysica Sinica, 2010, 26 (1): 14- 25
[3]   沈媚, 陈冰清, 于瑞嵩 et al. 冠状病毒S蛋白及其受体的结构和功能[J]. 微生物学通报, 2017, 44 (10): 2452- 2462
SHEN Mei , CHEN Bingqing , YU Ruisong et al. Structure and function of coronaviral S proteins and their receptors[J]. Microbiology China, 2017, 44 (10): 2452- 2462
doi: 10.13344/j.microbiol.china.170256
[4]   LI F . Receptor recognition mechanisms of coronaviruses:a decade of structural studies[J]. J Virol, 2015, 89 (4): 1954- 1964
doi: 10.1128/JVI.02615-14
[5]   JEFFERS S A , TUSELL S M , GILLIM-ROSS L et al. CD209L (L-SIGN) is a receptor for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus[J]. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2004, 101 (44): 15748- 15753
doi: 10.1073/pnas.0403812101
[6]   LARKIN M A , BLACKSHIELDS G , BROWN N P et al. Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0[J]. Bioinformatics, 2007, 23 (21): 2947- 2948
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm404
[7]   ETERSEN T N , BRUNAK S , VON HEIJNE G et al. SignalP 4.0:discriminating signal peptides from transmembrane regions[J]. Nat Methods, 2011, 8 (10): 785- 786
doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1701
[8]   KROGH A , LARSSON B , VON HEIJNE G et al. Predicting transmembrane protein topology with a hidden Markov model:application to complete genomes[J]. J Mol Biol, 2001, 305 (3): 567- 580
doi: 10.1006/jmbi.2000.4315
[9]   MITCHELL A L , ATTWOOD T K , BABBITT P C et al. InterPro in 2019:improving coverage, classification and access to protein sequence annotations[J]. Nucleic Acids Res, 2019, 47 (D1): D351- D360
doi: 10.1093/nar/gky1100
[10]   EL-GEBALI S , MISTRY J , BATEMAN A et al. The Pfam protein families database in 2019[J]. Nucleic Acids Res, 2019, 47 (D1): D427- D432
doi: 10.1093/nar/gky995
[11]   BERMAN H M , WESTBROOK J , FENG Z et al. The protein data bank[J]. Nucleic Acids Res, 2000, 28 (1): 235- 242
doi: 10.1093/nar/28.1.235
[12]   WRAPP D , WANG N , CORBETT K S et al. Cryo-EM structure of the 2019-nCoV spike in the prefusion conformation[J]. Science, 2020, 367 (6483): 1260- 1263
doi: 10.1126/science.abb2507
[13]   GUI M , SONG W , ZHOU H et al. Cryo-electron microscopy structures of the SARS-CoV spike glycoprotein reveal a prerequisite conformational state for receptor binding[J]. Cell Res, 2017, 27 (1): 119- 129
doi: 10.1038/cr.2016.152
[14]   SZKLARCZYK D , MORRIS J H , COOK H et al. The STRING database in 2017:quality-controlled protein-protein association networks, made broadly accessible[J]. Nucleic Acids Res, 2017, 45 (D1): D362- D368
doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw937
[15]   LARSEN J E , LUND O , NIELSEN M . Improved method for predicting linear B-cell epitopes[J]. Immunome Res, 2006, 2 2
doi: 10.1186/1745-7580-2-2
[16]   JENSEN K K , ANDREATTA M , MARCATILI P et al. Improved methods for predicting peptide binding affinity to MHC class II molecules[J]. Immunology, 2018, 154 (3): 394- 406
doi: 10.1111/imm.12889
[17]   COUGHLIN M M , PRABHAKAR B S . Neutralizing human monoclonal antibodies to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus:target, mechanism of action, and therapeutic potential[J]. Rev Med Virol, 2012, 22 (1): 2- 17
doi: 10.1002/rmv.706
[18]   MILLET J K , WHITTAKER G R . Host cell proteases:critical determinants of coronavirus tropism and pathogenesis[J]. Virus Res, 2015, 202 120- 134
doi: 10.1016/j.virusres.2014.11.021
[19]   KAWASE M , SHIRATO K , MATSUYAMA S et al. Protease-mediated entry via the endosome of human coronavirus 229E[J]. J Virol, 2009, 83 (2): 712- 721
doi: 10.1128/JVI.01933-08
[20]   SIMMONS G , GOSALIA D N , RENNEKAMPA J et al. Inhibitors of cathepsin L prevent severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus entry[J]. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2005, 102 (33): 11876- 11881
doi: 10.1073/pnas.0505577102
[21]   XU X , CHEN P , WANG J et al. Evolution of the novel coronavirus from the ongoing Wuhan outbreak and modeling of its spike protein for risk of human transmission[J]. Sci China Life Sci, 2020, 63 (3): 457- 460
doi: 10.1007/s11427-020-1637-5
[22]   FREUND N T , ROITBURD-BERMAN A , SUI J et al. Reconstitution of the receptor-binding motif of the SARS coronavirus[J]. Protein Eng Des Sel, 2015, 28 (12): 567- 575
doi: 10.1093/protein/gzv052
[23]   WALLS A C , TORTORICI M A , SNIJDER J et al. Tectonic conformational changes of a coronavirus spike glycoprotein promote membrane fusion[J]. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2017, 114 (42): 11157- 11162
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1708727114
[24]   WAN Y , SHANG J , GRAHAM R et al. Receptor recognition by the novel coronavirus from Wuhan:an analysis based on decade-long structural studies of SARS coronavirus[J]. J Virol, 2020, 94 (7):
doi: 10.1128/JVI.00127-20
[25]   PERLOT T , PENNINGER J M . ACE2-from the renin-angiotensin system to gut microbiota and malnutrition[J]. Microbes Infect, 2013, 15 (13): 866- 873
doi: 10.1016/j.micinf.2013.08.003
[26]   中国医师协会老年医学科医师分会, 国家老年医学中心 . 老年新型冠状病毒肺炎诊断和治疗专家共识[J]. 中国医师杂志, 2020, 22 (2): 161- 165
Geriatrics Medical Doctor Branch of the Chinese Medical Doctor Association , National Center of Gerontology . Expert consensus on the diagnosis and treatment of COVID-19 in the elderly[J]. Journal of Chinese Physician, 2020, 22 (2): 161- 165
doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1008-1372.2020.02.001
[27]   PATEL S , RAUF A , KHAN H et al. Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone (RAAS):The ubiquitous system for homeostasis and pathologies[J]. Biomed Pharmacother, 2017, 94 317- 325
doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2017.07.091
[28]   HAAK A J , DUCHARME M T , DIAZ ESPINOSA A M et al. Targeting GPCR signaling for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis therapies[J]. Trends Pharmacol Sci, 2020, 41 (3): 172- 182
doi: 10.1016/j.tips.2019.12.008
[1] HE Yeyan, ZHENG Chanying. Replication and transmission mechanisms of highly pathogenic human coronavirus[J]. J Zhejiang Univ (Med Sci), 2020, 49(3): 324-339.
[2] XU Yiming, LYU Dandan, YING Kejing. Coagulation dysfunction in COVID-19[J]. J Zhejiang Univ (Med Sci), 2020, 49(3): 340-346.
[3] HU Yan, LI Xiaofeng, GONG Weiyue. Nutritional support for critically ill patients with COVID-19[J]. J Zhejiang Univ (Med Sci), 2020, 49(3): 347-355.
[4] WANG Jincheng,LIU Jinpeng,WANG Yuanyuan,LIU Wei,CHEN Xiaoqun,SUN Chao,SHEN Xiaoyong,WANG Qidong,WU Yaping,LIANG Wenjie,RUAN Lingxiang. Dynamic changes of chest CT imaging in patients with COVID-19[J]. J Zhejiang Univ (Med Sci), 2020, 49(2): 191-197.
[5] ZHANG Xiaoyan, SUN Wei, SHANG Shiqiang, MAO Jianhua, FU Junfen, SHU Qiang, JIANG Kewen. Principles and suggestions on biosafety protection of biological specimen preservation during prevalence of COVID-19[J]. J Zhejiang Univ (Med Sci), 2020, 49(2): 170-177.
[6] CAO Shengli,FENG Peihua,SHI Pengpeng. Study on the epidemic development of COVID-19 in Hubei province by a modified SEIR model[J]. J Zhejiang Univ (Med Sci), 2020, 49(2): 178-184.
[7] CHEN Jun,LIU Danping,LIU Li,LIU Ping,XU Qingnian,XIA Lu,LING Yun,HUANG Dan,SONG Shuli,ZHANG Dandan,QIAN Zhiping,LI Tao,SHEN Yinzhong,LU Hongzhou. A pilot study of hydroxychloroquine in treatment of patients with moderate COVID-19[J]. J Zhejiang Univ (Med Sci), 2020, 49(2): 215-219.
[8] CHEN Zhimin,FU Junfen,SHU Qiang,WANG Wei,CHEN Yinghu,HUA Chunzhen,LI Fubang,LIN Ru,TANG Lanfang,WANG Tianlin,WANG Yingshuo,XU Weize,YANG Zihao,YE Sheng,YUAN Tianming,ZHANG Chenmei,ZHANG Yuanyuan. Diagnosis and treatment recommendation for pediatric COVID-19 (the second edition)[J]. J Zhejiang Univ (Med Sci), 2020, 49(2): 139-146.
[9] XU Kaijin,CAI Hongliu,SHEN Yihong,NI Qin,CHEN Yu,HU Shaohua,LI Jianping,WANG Huafen,YU Liang,HUANG He,QIU Yunqing,WEI Guoqing,FANG Qiang,ZHOU Jianying,SHENG Jifang,LIANG Tingbo,LI Lanjuan. Management of COVID-19: the Zhejiang experience[J]. J Zhejiang Univ (Med Sci), 2020, 49(2): 147-157.
[10] JIANG Saiping,LI Lu,RU Renping,ZHANG Chunhong,RAO Yuefeng,LIN Bin,WANG Rongrong,CHEN Na,WANG Xiaojuan,CAI Hongliu,SHENG Jifang,ZHOU Jianying,LU Xiaoyang,QIU Yunqing. Pharmaceutical care for severe and critically ill patients with COVID-19[J]. J Zhejiang Univ (Med Sci), 2020, 49(2): 158-169.
[11] LI Xin,DAI Tian,WANG Hong,SHI Junnian,YUAN Wei,LI Jing,CHEN Lijun,ZHANG Tianming,ZHANG Shanshan,KONG Yan,YUE Ning,SHI Hui,HE Yuping,HU Huifang,LIU Furong,YANG Caixia. Clinical analysis of suspected COVID-19 patients with anxiety and depression[J]. J Zhejiang Univ (Med Sci), 2020, 49(2): 203-208.
[12] LUO Song,YANG Lijuan,WANG Chun,LIU Chuanmiao,LI Dianming. Clinical observation of 6 severe COVID-19 patients treated with plasma exchange or tocilizumab[J]. J Zhejiang Univ (Med Sci), 2020, 49(2): 227-231.
[13] HONG Dongsheng,NI Jian,SHAN Wenya,LI Lu,HU Xi,YANG Hongyu,ZHAO Qingwei,ZHANG Xingguo. Establishment of a rapid identification of adverse drug reaction program in R language implementation based on monitoring data[J]. J Zhejiang Univ (Med Sci), 2020, 49(2): 253-259.
[14] ZHONG Qi,LI Zhi,SHEN Xiaoyong,XU Kaijin,SHEN Yihong,FANG Qiang,CHEN Feng,LIANG Tingbo. CT imaging features of patients with different clinical types of COVID-19[J]. J Zhejiang Univ (Med Sci), 2020, 49(2): 198-202.
[15] KANG Xianhui,ZHANG Rong,HE Huiliang,YAO Yongxing,ZHENG Yueying,WEN Xiaohong,ZHU Shengmei. Anesthesia management in cesarean section for patient with COVID-19: a case report[J]. J Zhejiang Univ (Med Sci), 2020, 49(2): 249-252.