|
|
Fetal anteroposterior renal pelvic diameter for predicting antenatal hydronephrosis requiring postnatal surgery |
WANG Zhan1( ),TANG Daxing1,TIAN Hongjuan1,YANG Fang1,WEN Hong2,WANG Junmei3,TAO Chang1,*( ) |
1. The Children's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, National Clinical Research Center for Child Health, Hangzhou 310052, China 2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Women's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310006, China 3. Department of Ultrasonography, Women's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310006, China |
|
|
Abstract Objective: To assess the value of fetal anteroposterior renal pelvic diameter (APD) in predicting antenatal hydronephrosis requiring surgical treatment after birth. Methods: A total of 525 cases of antenatal hydronephrosis detected by prenatal ultrasonography (ultrasound index APD ≥ 4 mm in the second trimester and APD ≥ 7 mm in the third trimester) in Zhejiang Prenatal Diagnosis Center from June 2007 to June 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. ROC curve was used to analyze the relationship between these ultrasound indicators and the requirement for surgical treatment after birth. Results: There were 162 cases (30.9%) diagnosed in the second trimester and 363 cases (69.1%) diagnosed in the third trimester; 131 cases were diagnosed pathologically after birth, of which 121 finally underwent surgical treatment. The area under ROC curve (AUC) of APD in middle pregnancy for prediction of requiring surgery 1-12 years after birth was 0.910; the cut-off value of APD was 8.45 mm with a sensitivity of 97.1%, specificity of 70.9%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 47.9%, and negative predictive value (NPV) of 98.9%. The AUC of APD in late pregnancy for prediction of requiring surgery 1-12 years after birth was 0.800; the cut-off value of APD was 12.25 mm with a sensitivity of 66.7%, specificity of 81.2%, PPV of 51.7%, and NPV of 89.1%. Conclusion: APD in pregnancy can be used to predict whether the fetus with hydronephrosis needs surgical treatment after birth, and the prediction value of APD in the middle pregnancy is better.
|
Received: 30 July 2019
Published: 04 January 2020
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
TAO Chang
E-mail: wangzhan@zju.edu.cn;taochang@zju.edu.com
|
肾盂前后径对肾积水胎儿出生后是否手术的预测价值
目的: 评估肾盂前后径(APD)预测肾积水胎儿出生后是否需要手术的价值。方法: 回顾性分析2007年6月至2018年6月在浙江省产前诊断中心产前超声检查发现的肾积水胎儿(孕中期超声指标APD≥4 mm,孕晚期APD≥7 mm)525例的资料,采用ROC曲线评估孕中期、孕晚期APD值预测患儿出生后是否需要手术的敏感度、特异度等指标。结果: 妊娠中期确诊162例(30.9%),妊娠晚期确诊363例(69.1%)。131例患儿出生后确诊病理性肾积水,121例进行了手术治疗。孕中期APD值预测患儿出生1~12岁是否需要手术的ROC曲线下面积为0.910,当APD临界值为8.45 mm时,预测的敏感度为97.1%,特异度为70.9%,阳性预测值为47.9%,阴性预测值为98.9%。孕晚期APD值预测患儿出生1~12岁是否需要手术的ROC曲线下面积为0.800,当APD临界值为12.25 mm时,预测的敏感度为66.7%,特异度为81.2%,阳性预测值为51.7%,阴性预测值为89.1%。结论: 孕期APD值可用于预测肾积水胎儿出生后是否需要手术治疗,且以孕中期APD值的预测效果为佳。
关键词:
超声检查, 产前,
肾盂积水/胚胎学,
肾盂积水/诊断,
肾盂积水/外科学,
回顾性研究
|
|
[1] |
RICHTER-RODIER M , LANGE A E , HINKEN B et al. Ultrasound screening strategies for the diagnosis of congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract[J]. Ultraschall Med, 2012, 33 (7): E333- E338
doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1325611
|
|
|
[2] |
ISMAILI K , HALL M , DONNER C et al. Results of systematic screening for minor degrees of fetal renal pelvis dilatation in an unselected population[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2003, 188 (1): 242- 246
doi: 10.1067/mob.2003.81
|
|
|
[3] |
SAIRAM S , AL-HABIB A , SASSON S et al. Natural history of fetal hydronephrosis diagnosed on mid-trimester ultrasound[J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2001, 17 (3): 191- 196
doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.2001.00333.x
|
|
|
[4] |
TEKGVL S D, DOGAN H S, KOCVARA R, et al. EAU guidelines on paediatric urology[S]. 2017: 49-53.
|
|
|
[5] |
MORIN L , CENDRON M , CROMBLEHOLMET M et al. Minimal hydronephrosis in the fetus: clinical significance and implications for management[J]. J Urol, 1996, 155 (6): 2047- 2049
doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)66102-0
|
|
|
[6] |
HOTHI D K , WADE A S , GILBERT R et al. Mild fetal renal pelvis dilatation: much ado about nothing?[J]. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol, 2009, 4 (1): 168- 177
doi: 10.2215/CJN.00810208
|
|
|
[7] |
AHMAD G , GREEN P . Outcome of fetal pyelectasis diagnosed antenatally[J]. J Obstet Gynaecol, 2005, 25 (2): 119- 122
|
|
|
[8] |
ZHANG D , SUN X , CHEN X et al. Ultrasound evaluation for prediction of outcomes and surgical decision in fetal hydronephrosis[J]. Exp Ther Med, 2019, 18 (2): 1399- 1406
|
|
|
[9] |
CHO H Y , JUNG I , KIM Y H et al. Reliability of society of fetal urology and Onen grading system in fetal hydronephrosis[J]. Obstet Gynecol Sci, 2019, 62 (2): 87- 92
doi: 10.5468/ogs.2019.62.2.87
|
|
|
[10] |
KIENER T A , WOHLMUTH C , SCHIMKE C et al. Ultrasound markers in fetal hydronephrosis to predict postnatal surgery[J]. Ultraschall Med, 2018,
|
|
|
[11] |
BRAGA L H , MCGRATH M , FARROKHYAR F et al. Associations of initial society for fetal urology grades and urinary tract dilatation risk groups with clinical outcomes in patients with isolated prenatal hydronephrosis[J]. J Urol, 2017, 197 (3 Pt 2): 831- 837
|
|
|
[12] |
CHALMERS D J , MEYERS M L , BRODIEK E et al. Inter-rater reliability of the APD, SFU and UTD grading systems in fetal sonography and MRI[J]. J Pediatr Urol, 2016, 12 (5): 305 e1- 305 e5
doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2016.06.012
|
|
|
[13] |
PLEVANI C , LOCATELLI A , PATERLINI G et al. Fetal hydronephrosis: natural history and risk factors for postnatal surgery[J]. J Perinat Med, 2014, 42 (3): 385- 391
|
|
|
[14] |
中华医学会小儿外科分会泌尿外科学组 . 先天性肾盂输尿管交界处梗阻诊疗专家共识[J]. 中华小儿外科杂志, 2018, 39 (11): 804- 810 Urology Group, Chinese Society of Pediatric Surgery . Expert consensus on diagnosing and treating congenital ureteropeivic junction obstruction[J]. Chinese Journal of Pediatric Surgery, 2018, 39 (11): 804- 810
doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3006.2018.11.002
|
|
|
[15] |
NGUYEN H T , HERNDON C D , COOPER C et al. The Society for Fetal Urology consensus statement on the evaluation and management of antenatal hydronephrosis[J]. J Pediatr Urol, 2010, 6 (3): 212- 231
doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2010.02.205
|
|
|
[16] |
FERNBACH S K , MAIZELS M , CONWAY J J . Ultrasound grading of hydronephrosis: Introduction to the system used by the Society for Fetal Urology[J]. Pediatr Radiol, 1993, 23 (6): 478- 480
doi: 10.1007/BF02012459
|
|
|
[17] |
ZANETTA V C , ROSMAN B M , BROMLEY B et al. Variations in management of mild prenatal hydronephrosis among maternal-fetal medicine obstetricians, and pediatric urologists and radiologists[J]. J Urol, 2012, 188 (5): 1935- 1939
doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.07.011
|
|
|
[18] |
NGUYEN H T , BENSON C B , BROMLEY B et al. Multidisciplinary consensus on the classification of prenatal and postnatal urinary tract dilation (UTD classification system)[J]. J Pediatr Urol, 2014, 10 (6): 982- 998
doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2014.10.002
|
|
|
[19] |
GRAMELLINI D , FIENI S , CAFORIO E et al. Diagnostic accuracy of fetal renal pelvis anteroposterior diameter as a predictor of significant postnatal nephrouropathy: second versus third trimester of pregnancy[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2006, 194 (1): 167- 173
doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.06.071
|
|
|
[20] |
WEIN A , KAVOUSSI L , PARTIN A et al. Campbell-Walsh urology[M]. 11th ed Philadelphia: Elsevier, 2016: 3058
|
|
|
[21] |
JOHN U , K?HLER C , SCHULZ S et al. The impact of fetal renal pelvic diameter on postnatal outcome[J]. Prenat Diagn, 2004, 24 (8): 591- 595
doi: 10.1002/pd.899
|
|
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
|
Shared |
|
|
|
|
|
Discussed |
|
|
|
|