Please wait a minute...
J Zhejiang Univ (Med Sci)  2019, Vol. 48 Issue (3): 267-274    DOI: 10.3785/j.issn.1008-9292.2019.06.06
    
Effect of different working time on the prognosis of ischemic stroke patients undergoing intravenous thrombolysis
PAN Feihu1(),LOU Min1,*(),CHEN Zhicai1,CHEN Hongfang2,XU Dongjuan3,WANG Zhimin4,HU Haifang5,WU Chenglong6,ZHANG Xiaoling7,MA Xiaodong8,WANG Yaxian9,HU Haitao1,Improving In-hospital Stroke Service Utilisation (MISSION) in Zhejiang Province
1. Department of Neurology, the Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310009, China
2. Department of Neurology, Jinhua Hospital of Zhejiang University, Jinhua Municipal Central Hospital, Jinhua 321000, Zhejiang Province, China
3. Department of Neurology, Dongyang People's Hospital, Dongyang 322100, Zhejiang Province, China
4. Department of Neurology, Taizhou First People's Hospital, Taizhou 318020, Zhejiang Province, China
5. Department of Neurology, the First People's Hospital of Xiaoshan District, Hangzhou 311201, China
6. Department of Neurology, Shaoxing People's Hospital, Shaoxing 312000, Zhejiang Province, China
7. Department of Neurology, the Second Hospital of Jiaxing, Jiaxing 314000, Zhejiang Province, China
8. Department of Neurology, Haiyan People's Hospital, Haiyan 314300, Zhejiang Province, China
9. Department of Neurology, Huzhou Central Hospital, Huzhou 313003, Zhejiang Province, China
Download: HTML( 8 )   PDF(933KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      

Abstract  

Objective: To investigate the effect of working time on the prognosis of patients with ischemic stroke undergoing intravenous thrombolysis. Methods: Clinical data of 3050 patients with ischemic stroke received intravenous thrombolysis from 71 hospitals in Zhejiang Province during June 2017 and September 2018 were retrospective analyzed. Whole day of Saturday and Sunday were defined as weekend; whole day of Monday to Friday were defined as weekdays; Monday to Friday 8:00-17:00 were defined as daytime of weekdays; Monday to Friday 17:01-07:59 on next day were defined as nights of weekdays; unconventional working time were defined as weekend and nights of weekdays. Good outcome was defined as mRS 0-2 at 3 months. Univariate analyses of baseline and prognostic variables in group of weekend and weekdays, nights of weekdays and daytime of weekdays, unconventional working time and daytime of weekdays were performed. Binary logistic regression was used to investigate whether weekend, nights of weekdays and unconventional working time were independent predicting factors of outcome after intravenous thrombolysis, respectively. Results: There was no difference in 7-day mortality, 3-month mortality and good outcome at 3-month between weekend group and weekdays group, nights of weekdays group and daytime of weekdays group, unconventional working time group and daytime of weekdays group (all P>0.05). Binary logistic regression results showed that weekends, nights of weekdays and unconventional working time were not independent predicting factors for outcome after intravenous thrombolysis (all P>0.05). Conclusion: The working time has not affected the outcomes of patients with ischemic stroke undergoing intravenous thrombolysis in studied hospitals of Zhejiang province.



Key wordsStroke/therapy      Brain ischemia/therapy      Tissue plasminogen activator/therapeutic use      Thrombolytic therapy      Time factors      Prognosis      Retrospective studies     
Received: 20 December 2018      Published: 04 September 2019
CLC:  R743  
Corresponding Authors: LOU Min     E-mail: p841024@163.com;lm99@zju.edu.cn
Cite this article:

PAN Feihu, LOU Min, CHEN Zhicai, CHEN Hongfang, XU Dongjuan, WANG Zhimin, HU Haifang, WU Chenglong, ZHANG Xiaoling, MA Xiaodong, WANG Yaxian, HU Haitao, Improving In-hospital Stroke Service Utilisation (MISSION) in Zhejiang Province . Effect of different working time on the prognosis of ischemic stroke patients undergoing intravenous thrombolysis. J Zhejiang Univ (Med Sci), 2019, 48(3): 267-274.

URL:

http://www.zjujournals.com/med/10.3785/j.issn.1008-9292.2019.06.06     OR     http://www.zjujournals.com/med/Y2019/V48/I3/267


不同工作时间段就诊对缺血性脑卒中患者静脉溶栓预后的影响

目的: 比较不同工作时间段就诊并接受静脉溶栓治疗的缺血性脑卒中患者预后是否存在差异。方法: 回顾性分析浙江省71家医院2017年6月至2018年9月接受静脉溶栓治疗的3050例缺血性脑卒中患者的资料。比较周末组与非周末组、工作日夜间组与白天组、非常规工作时间组与常规工作时间组的基线资料及预后,采用二元Logistic回归分析法研究周末、工作日夜间、非常规工作时间是否为静脉溶栓患者预后的独立影响因素。结果: 周末组与非周末组、工作日夜间组与白天组、非常规工作时间组与常规工作时间组患者7 d病死率、3个月病死率和3个月预后良好的比例差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。二元Logistic回归分析结果显示,周末、工作日夜间、非常规工作时间均不是缺血性脑卒中患者静脉溶栓治疗3个月预后的独立影响因素(均P>0.05)。结论: 浙江省周末与非周末、工作日夜间与白天、非常规工作时间与常规工作时间接受静脉溶栓的缺血性脑卒中患者的预后无差异。


关键词: 卒中/治疗,  脑缺血/治疗,  组织型纤溶酶原激活物/治疗应用,  血栓溶解疗法,  时间因素,  预后,  回顾性研究 
[$\bar x \pm s$或n(%)或M(Q1Q3)]
组别 n 年龄(岁) 女性 高血压史 吸烟史 心房颤动史 糖尿病史 高血脂史 卒中史 DNT(min) ONT(min) 基线NIHSS评分 7 d死亡 3个月死亡 3个月预后良好
“—”无相关数据.DNT:入院至溶栓时间;ONT:起病至溶栓时间;NIHSS:美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表.
周末组 844 69.1±12.6 341(40.4) 562(66.6) 257(30.5) 213(25.2) 150(17.8) 135(16.0) 125(14.8) 54(40,74) 162(120,219) 7(3,13) 30(3.7) 63(7.5) 546(64.7)
非周末组 2206 69.0±12.6 850(38.5) 1431(64.9) 700(31.7) 582(26.4) 355(16.1) 352(16.0) 277(12.6) 55(42,75) 165(120,215) 7(3,13) 105(5.1) 186(8.4) 1439(65.2)
t/χ2/Z 0.217 0.898 0.797 0.466 0.416 1.247 0.001 2.710 -1.544 -0.129 -0.214 2.608 0.762 0.078
P >0.05 >0.05 >0.05 >0.05 >0.05 >0.05 >0.05 >0.05 >0.05 >0.05 >0.05 >0.05 >0.05 >0.05
Tab 1 Comparison of baseline and prognostic variables in ischemic stroke patients visited on weekend and weekdays
[$\bar x \pm s$或n(%)或M(Q1Q3)]
组别 n 年龄(岁) 女性 高血压史 吸烟史 心房颤动史 糖尿病史 高血脂史 卒中史 DNT(min) ONT(min) 基线NIHSS评分 7 d死亡 3个月死亡 3个月预后良好
“—”无相关数据.DNT:入院至溶栓时间;ONT:起病至溶栓时间;NIHSS:美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表.
工作日白天组 1211 69.7±12.4 468(38.6) 785(64.8) 376(31.0) 313(25.8) 187(15.4) 189(15.6) 175(14.5) 55(41,75) 167(120,218) 6(3,13) 58(5.1) 104(8.6) 785(64.8)
工作日夜间组 1000 68.0±12.9 383(38.3) 650(65.0) 326(32.6) 270(27.0) 169(16.9) 165(16.5) 103(10.3) 57(43,75) 165(120,211) 7(3,14) 47(5.2) 82(8.2) 659(65.9)
t/χ2/Z 3.213 0.028 0.008 0.608 0.375 0.862 0.325 8.585 1.198 0.894 0.568 0.002 0.107 0.281
P <0.01 >0.05 >0.05 >0.05 >0.05 >0.05 >0.05 <0.01 >0.05 >0.05 >0.05 >0.05 >0.05 >0.05
Tab 2 Comparison of baseline and prognostic variables in ischemic stroke patients visited at nights of and on the daytime of weekdays
[$\bar x \pm s$或n(%)或M(Q1Q3)]
组别 n 年龄(岁) 女性 高血压史 吸烟史 心房颤动史 糖尿病史 高血脂史 卒中史 DNT(min) ONT(min) 基线NIHSS评分 7 d死亡 3个月死亡 3个月预后良好
“—”无相关数据.DNT:入院至溶栓时间;ONT:起病至溶栓时间;NIHSS:美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表.
常规工作时间组 1209 69.7±12.4 467(38.6) 783(64.8) 375(31.0) 312(25.8) 187(15.5) 189(15.6) 174(14.4) 55(41,74) 166(120,218) 6(3,13) 58(5.1) 104(8.6) 783(64.8)
非常规工作时间组 1841 68.5±12.8 724(39.3) 1210(65.7) 582(31.6) 483(26.2) 318(17.3) 298(16.2) 228(12.4) 55(42,74) 164(120,215) 7(3,13) 77(4.5) 145(7.9) 1202(65.3)
t/χ2/Z -2.656 0.150 0.298 0.120 0.070 1.723 0.167 2.570 -0.321 -0.661 -0.469 0.612 0.513 0.089
P <0.01 >0.05 >0.05 >0.05 >0.05 >0.05 >0.05 <0.01 >0.05 >0.05 >0.05 >0.05 >0.05 >0.05
Tab 3 Comparison of baseline and prognostic variables in ischemic stroke patients visited on unconventional working time and daytime of weekdays
[$\bar x \pm s$或n(%)或M(Q1Q3)]
影响因素 预后不良(n=1065) 预后良好(n=1985) t/χ2/Z P
DNT:入院至溶栓时间;ONT:起病至溶栓时间;NIHSS:美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表; rt-PA:重组组织型纤溶酶原激活剂.1 mmHg=0.133 kPa.
年龄(岁) 74±12 67±12 -16.36 <0.01
女性 471(44.2) 720(36.3) 18.421 <0.01
高血压史 752(70.6) 1241(62.5) 20.039 <0.01
吸烟史 272(25.5) 685(34.5) 25.895 <0.01
心房颤动史 410(38.5) 385(19.4) 131.239 <0.01
糖尿病史 189(17.7) 316(15.9) 1.675 >0.10
高血脂史 172(16.2) 315(15.9) 0.041 >0.10
卒中史 162(15.2) 240(12.1) 5.898 <0.05
DNT(min) 58(43,78) 54(41,73) -3.396 <0.01
ONT(min) 170(125,219) 162(118,215) -2.493 <0.05
基线NIHSS评分 13(8,18.5) 4(2,8) -27.475 <0.01
抗血小板治疗史 189(17.7) 280(14.1) 7.060 <0.01
溶栓前收缩压(mmHg) 158(142,171) 153(139,168) -4.479 <0.01
溶栓前舒张压(mmHg) 84(75,95) 86(76,95) -1.202 >0.10
血糖(mmol/L) 7.17(6.1,8.84) 6.79(5.88,8.38) -4.768 <0.01
rt-PA溶栓 1020(95.8) 1894(95.8) 0.210 >0.10
就诊时间  周末 298(28) 546(27.5) 0.078 >0.10
          非周末 767(72) 1439(72.5)
就诊时间  工作日夜间 341(44.5) 659(45.8) 0.281 >0.10
          工作日白天 426(55.5) 780(54.2)
就诊时间  非常规工作时间 639(60.0) 1202(60.6) 0.089 >0.10
          常规工作时间 426(40.0) 783(39.4)
Tab 4 Univariate analysis of influencing factors for the outcome at 3-month after intravenous thrombolysis in patients with ischemic stroke
影响因素 OR 95%CI P
DNT:入院至溶栓时间;ONT:起病至溶栓时间;NIHSS:美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表.
年龄 0.969 0.961~0.978 <0.01
女性 1.032 0.825~1.292 >0.05
高血压史 0.856 0.696~1.054 >0.05
吸烟史 1.009 0.791~1.287 >0.05
心房颤动史 0.768 0.614~0.960 <0.05
卒中史 0.848 0.636~1.130 >0.05
DNT 0.997 0.994~1.000 <0.05
ONT 0.997 0.995~0.999 <0.01
基线NIHSS评分 0.861 0.848~0.875 <0.01
抗血小板治疗史 1.054 0.799~1.389 >0.05
溶栓前收缩压 0.994 0.989~0.998 <0.01
血糖 0.994 0.981~1.007 >0.05
周末与非周末 0.990 0.803~1.220 >0.05
Tab 5 Logistic regression analysis on 3-month outcome of intravenous thrombolysis in ischemic stroke patients visited on weekend and weekdays
影响因素 OR 95%CI P
DNT:入院至溶栓时间;ONT:起病至溶栓时间;NIHSS:美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表.
年龄 0.970 0.961~0.980 <0.01
女性 0.895 0.683~1.172 >0.05
高血压史 0.918 0.716~1.178 >0.05
吸烟史 0.868 0.649~1.162 >0.05
心房颤动史 0.739 0.566~0.965 <0.05
卒中史 0.790 0.559~1.116 >0.05
DNT 0.995 0.991~0.999 <0.05
ONT 0.998 0.996~1.000 <0.05
基线NIHSS评分 0.855 0.838~0.871 <0.01
抗血小板治疗史 1.016 0.730~1.412 >0.05
溶栓前收缩压 0.995 0.990~1.000 >0.05
血糖 0.956 0.924~0.989 <0.05
工作日夜间与白天 1.096 0.872~1.377 >0.05
Tab 6 Logistic regression analysis on 3-month outcome of intravenous thrombolysis in ischemic stroke patients visited at nights of weekdays and daytimes of weekdays
影响因素 OR 95%CI P
DNT:入院至溶栓时间;ONT:起病至溶栓时间;NIHSS:美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表.
年龄 0.969 0.961~0.978 <0.01
女性 1.031 0.824~1.290 >0.05
高血压史 0.855 0.695~1.052 >0.05
吸烟史 1.009 0.791~1.287 >0.05
心房颤动史 0.768 0.614~0.961 <0.05
卒中史 0.850 0.638~1.133 >0.05
DNT 0.997 0.994~1.000 <0.05
ONT 0.997 0.995~0.999 <0.01
基线NIHSS评分 0.861 0.848~0.875 <0.01
抗血小板治疗史 1.053 0.799~1.387 >0.05
溶栓前收缩压 0.994 0.989~0.998 <0.01
血糖 0.994 0.981~1.007 >0.05
非常规工作时间与常规工作时间 1.061 0.875~1.287 >0.05
Tab 7 Logistic regression analysis on 3-month outcome of intravenous thrombolysis in ischemic stroke patients visited on unconventional working time and daytime of weekdays
[1]   BELL C M , REDELMEIER D A . Waiting for urgent procedures on the weekend among emergently hospitalized patients[J]. Am J Med, 2004, 117 (3): 175- 181
doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2004.02.047
[2]   ALBRIGHT K C , RAMAN R , ERNSTROM K et al. Can comprehensive stroke centers erase the 'weekend effect'?[J]. Cerebrovasc Dis, 2009, 27 (2): 107- 113
doi: 10.1159/000177916
[3]   ALBRIGHT K C , SAVITZ S I , RAMAN R et al. Comprehensive stroke centers and the 'weekend effect': the SPOTRIAS experience[J]. Cerebrovasc Dis, 2012, 34 (5-6): 424- 429
doi: 10.1159/000345077
[4]   HANDEL A E, PATEL S V, SKINGSLEY A, et al. Weekend admissions as an independent predictor of mortality: an analysis of Scottish hospital admissions[J/OL]. BMJ Open, 2012, 2(6): e001789.
[5]   HASEGAWA Y , YONEDA Y , OKUDA S et al. The effect of weekends and holidays on stroke outcome in acute stroke units[J]. Cerebrovasc Dis, 2005, 20 (5): 325- 331
doi: 10.1159/000087932
[6]   INOUE T , FUSHIMI K . Weekend versus weekday admission and in-hospital mortality from ischemic stroke in Japan[J]. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis, 2015, 24 (12): 2787- 2792
doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2015.08.010
[7]   JAUSS M , OERTEL W , ALLENDOERFER J et al. Bias in request for medical care and impact on outcome during office and non-office hours in stroke patients[J]. Eur J Neurol, 2009, 16 (10): 1165- 1167
doi: 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2009.02656.x
[8]   KAMITANI S, NISHIMURA K, NAKAMURA F, et al. Consciousness level and off-hour admission affect discharge outcome of acute stroke patients: a J-ASPECT study[J/OL]. J Am Heart Assoc, 2014, 3(5): e001059.
[9]   KIM S C , HONG K S , HWANG S I et al. Weekend admission in patients with acute ischemic stroke is not associated with poor functional outcome than weekday admission[J]. J Clin Neurol, 2012, 8 (4): 265- 270
[10]   PALMER W L , BOTTLE A , DAVIE C et al. Dying for the weekend: a retrospective cohort study on the association between day of hospital presentation and the quality and safety of stroke care[J]. Arch Neurol, 2012, 69 (10): 1296- 1302
[11]   OGBU U C , WESTERT G P , SLOBBE L C et al. A multifaceted look at time of admission and its impact on case-fatality among a cohort of ischaemic stroke patients[J]. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 2011, 82 (1): 8- 13
doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2009.202176
[12]   RUDD A G , HOFFMAN A , DOWN C et al. Access to stroke care in England, Wales and Northern Ireland: the effect of age, gender and weekend admission[J]. Age Ageing, 2007, 36 (3): 247- 255
doi: 10.1093/ageing/afm007
[13]   TURNER M , BARBER M , DODDS H et al. Stroke patients admitted within normal working hours are more likely to achieve process standards and to have better outcomes[J]. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 2016, 87 (2): 138- 143
[14]   BRAY B D , CLOUD G C , JAMES M A et al. Weekly variation in health-care quality by day and time of admission: a nationwide, registry-based, prospective cohort study of acute stroke care[J]. Lancet, 2016, 388 (10040): 170- 177
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30443-3
[15]   HOH B L , CHI Y Y , WATERS M F et al. Effect of weekend compared with weekday stroke admission on thrombolytic use, in-hospital mortality, discharge disposition, hospital charges, and length of stay in the Nationwide Inpatient Sample Database, 2002 to 2007[J]. Stroke, 2010, 41 (10): 2323- 2328
doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.591081
[16]   HSIEH C Y, CHEN C H, CHEN Y C, et al. National survey of thrombolytic therapy for acute ischemic stroke in Taiwan 2003-2010[J/OL]. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis, 2013, 22(8): e620-7.
[17]   KAZLEY A S , HILLMAN D G , JOHNSTON K C et al. Hospital care for patients experiencing weekend vs weekday stroke: a comparison of quality and aggressiveness of care[J]. Arch Neurol, 2010, 67 (1): 39- 44
[18]   SHI L , ZHANG D , CHEN L et al. "Weekend effect" or "saturday effect"? an analysis of hospital mortality for patients with ischemic stroke in south Carolina[J]. Circulation, 2016, 134 (19): 1510- 1512
doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.024535
[1] LI Zhanlu,HUANG He,ZHANG Wenbin,WANG Min,FU Guosheng. Prognosis of patients with vulnerable plaques indicated by coronary CT angiography[J]. J Zhejiang Univ (Med Sci), 2020, 49(1): 76-81.
[2] MI Shuang,WU Yanjun,HONG Zhenghua,WANG Zhangfu,FENG Xingbing,ZHENG Guangbin. Expression of TLR4/MyD88/NF-κB pathway genes and its related inflammatory factors in secondary spinal cord injury[J]. J Zhejiang Univ (Med Sci), 2019, 48(6): 609-616.
[3] WANG Linyan,XUE Jiajin,CHEN Yi,LYU Chengjie,HUANG Shoujiang,TOU Jinfa,GAO Zhigang,CHEN Qingjiang. Clinical analysis of annular pancreas in neonates[J]. J Zhejiang Univ (Med Sci), 2019, 48(5): 481-486.
[4] MA Dong,LAI Dengming,ZHAO Xiaoxia,HU Shuqi,LYU Chengjie,HUANG Shoujiang,QIN Qi,TOU Jinfa. Therapeutic experience of type Ⅲ-b congenital intestinal atresia[J]. J Zhejiang Univ (Med Sci), 2019, 48(5): 487-492.
[5] WANG Zhan,TANG Daxing,TIAN Hongjuan,YANG Fang,WEN Hong,WANG Junmei,TAO Chang. Fetal anteroposterior renal pelvic diameter for predicting antenatal hydronephrosis requiring postnatal surgery[J]. J Zhejiang Univ (Med Sci), 2019, 48(5): 493-498.
[6] ZHANG Shuchao,ZHU Cheng,YE Youxin,LI Hua. Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty combined with thrombolysis for acute thrombosis in arterio-venous fistula and graft[J]. J Zhejiang Univ (Med Sci), 2019, 48(5): 533-539.
[7] WANG Yayun,CHEN Yuan,YANG Mengmeng,XI Fangfang,ZHAN Qitao,JIANG Ying,ZHAO Baihui,LUO Qiong. Prognosis of fetuses with cystichygroma and nuchal translucency/nuchal fold thickening on prenatal echography[J]. J Zhejiang Univ (Med Sci), 2019, 48(4): 434-438.
[8] ZHANG Dandan,WANG Junmei. Prenatal diagnosis and management of fetal hepatic hemangioma[J]. J Zhejiang Univ (Med Sci), 2019, 48(4): 439-445.
[9] TONG Fan,YANG Rulai,LIU Chang,WU Dingwen,ZHANG Ting,HUANG Xinwen,HONG Fang,QIAN Guling,HUANG Xiaolei,ZHOU Xuelian,SHU Qiang,ZHAO Zhengyan. Screening for hereditary tyrosinemia and genotype analysis in newborns[J]. J Zhejiang Univ (Med Sci), 2019, 48(4): 459-464.
[10] ZHANG Jianmin. Advances in surgical treatment of ischemic cerebrovascular disease[J]. J Zhejiang Univ (Med Sci), 2019, 48(3): 233-240.
[11] ZHONG Wansi, CHEN Zhicai, CHEN Hongfang, XU Dongjuan, WANG Zhimin, HU Haifang, WU Chenglong, ZHANG Xiaoling, MA Xiaodong, WANG Yaxian, HU Haitao, LOU Min, Improving In-hospital Stroke Service Utilisation (MISSION) in Zhejiang Province . Effects of emergency medical service on prognosis of ischemic stroke patients treated with intravenous thrombolysis[J]. J Zhejiang Univ (Med Sci), 2019, 48(3): 241-246.
[12] CHEN Hongfang, GONG Xiaoxian, XU Dongjuan, WANG Zhimin, HU Haifang, WU Chenglong, ZHANG Xiaoling, MA Xiaodong, WANG Yaxian, HU Haitao, LOU Min, CHEN Zhicai, Improving In-hospital Stroke Service Utilisation (MISSION) in Zhejiang Province . Advanced treatment time improves outcomes of patients with ischemic stroke undergoing reperfusion therapy[J]. J Zhejiang Univ (Med Sci), 2019, 48(3): 247-253.
[13] TAO Anyang, WANG Zhimin, CHEN Hongfang, XU Dongjuan, HU Haifang, WU Chenglong, ZHANG Xiaoling, MA Xiaodong, WANG Yaxian, HU Haitao, LOU Min, Improving In-hospital Stroke Service Utilisation (MISSION) in Zhejiang Province . Association of atrial fibrillation with hemorrhagic transformation after intravenous thrombolysis in patients with ischemic stroke[J]. J Zhejiang Univ (Med Sci), 2019, 48(3): 254-259.
[14] ZHANG Congcong, LOU Min, CHEN Zhicai, CHEN Hongfang, XU Dongjuan, WANG Zhimin, HU Haifang, WU Chenglong, ZHANG Xiaoling, MA Xiaodong, WANG Yaxian, HU Haitao, Improving In-hospital Stroke Service Utilisation (MISSION) in Zhejiang Province . Analysis of intravenous thrombolysis time and prognosis in patients with in-hospital stroke[J]. J Zhejiang Univ (Med Sci), 2019, 48(3): 260-266.
[15] FU Jianlan,SONG Fahuan,CHENG Aiping. PET/CT imaging manifestations of different pathological subtypes of liposarcoma[J]. J Zhejiang Univ (Med Sci), 2019, 48(2): 193-199.