|
|
Microscopic and molecular identification of pine needles |
GONG Hengpei1( ),LIU Zuwang1,CHEN Yanyue1,ZHANG Jian2,CHENG Rubin1,HUANG Zhen1,*( ) |
1. College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou 310053, China 2. College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin 300193, China |
|
|
Abstract Objective: To identify pine needles from different plant origins by microscopic and molecular approaches. Methods: The characteristics of pine needles of Pinus massoniana Lamb., Pinus thunbergii Parl. and Pinus armandii Franch. were investigated via plant morphology and microscopic characteristics. ITS2 and rbcL were analyzed with PCR amplification and bi-directional sequencing. MEGA 6.0 was used to calculate the intra-and inter-specific Kimura-2-Parameter (K2P) distances, and the phylogenetic tree was constructed by using the neighbor-joining (NJ) method. Results: There were significant differences in the number and length of pine needles, number of vascular bundles, distribution of stomatal lines, number and distribution of resin channels among three kinds of pine needles. The lengths of ITS2 sequences of Pinus massoniana Lamb., Pinus thunbergii Parl. and Pinus armandii Franch. were 470, 469 and 470 bp, respectively. The lengths of rbcL sequences in three kinds of pine needles were 553 bp. The intraspecific variation rates of ITS2 sequences in Pinus massoniana Lamb., Pinus thunbergii Parl. and Pinus armandii Franch. were 0%, 0.2%, and 2.8%, respectively; and the intraspecific variation rates of rbcL sequences were 0%, 2.4%, and 1.1%, respectively. There was no significant barcoding gap in intraspecific and interspecific genetic distances of ITS2 sequences. The intraspecific and interspecific distances of rbcL sequences were clearly separated in the barcoding gap test. The NJ tree based on rbcL showed that the three pine needles clustered into three separate groups, indicating that rbcL DNA marker could distinguish the Pinus massoniana Lamb., Pinus thunbergii Parl., Pinus armandii Franch. and its close relative species. Conclusions: The three types of pine needles can be distinguished accurately and rapidly by microscopic and molecular identification. The study provides methodology and experimental basis for the quality evaluation and classification of pine needles.
|
Received: 12 February 2018
Published: 18 September 2018
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
HUANG Zhen
E-mail: gonghengpei1994@163.com;huangzhen@zcmu.edu.cn
|
松针的显微及分子鉴别研究
目的: 利用显微和分子鉴定技术对不同植物基源的松针药材进行鉴别,为松针的鉴别提供科学依据。方法: 采用基源、显微鉴定的方法研究马尾松(Pinus massoniana Lamb.)、黑松(Pinus thunbergii Parl.)和华山松(Pinus armandii Franch.)的特征;利用PCR扩增和双向测序分析植物DNA条形码ITS2和rbcL序列特征;采用分子进化遗传分析(MEGA)6.0软件进行种间、种内Kimura2-parameter(K2P)遗传距离计算,并构建邻接系统聚类树。结果: 三种松针数目及长度、维管束数、气孔线的分布、树脂道数目及分布等具有明显区别。马尾松、黑松和华山松的ITS2序列长度分别为470、469和470 bp,rbcL序列长度均为553 bp;ITS2序列在马尾松、黑松和华山松的种内变异率分别为0%、0.2%和2.8%,rbcL序列在这三种松针样品的种内变异率分别为0%、2.4%和1.1%。ITS2序列在松针的种内和种间遗传距离中不存在显著的条形码间隔;而rbcL序列的种内和种间距离存在一定的条形码间隔。邻接系统树结果表明,三种松针药材聚为不同的分支,rbcL条形码序列可鉴别马尾松、黑松、华山松及其近缘的植物。结论: 利用基源、显微及分子鉴定技术可准确、快速地鉴别马尾松、黑松和华山松,为松针的质量评价和分类鉴别提供了方法和依据。
关键词:
松科/化学,
序列分析,
药材显微鉴定,
自动数据处理
|
|
[1] |
全国中草药汇编写组 . 全国中草药汇编:上册[M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 1976: 495 National Chinese Herbal Writing Group . National compilation of Chinese herbal medicine:volume one[M]. Beijing: People's Medical Publishing House, 1976: 495
|
|
|
[2] |
江苏新医学院 . 中药大辞典:上册[M]. 上海: 上海科学技术出版社, 1986: 1254 Jiangsu New Medical College . Chinese materia medica dictionary:volume one[M]. Shanghai: Shanghai Scientific & Technical Publishers, 1986: 1254
|
|
|
[3] |
李时珍 . 本草纲目[M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2004: 1917 LI Shizhen . Compendium of materia medica[M]. Beijing: People's Medical Publishing House, 2004: 1917
|
|
|
[4] |
ROGACHEV A D , SALAKHUTDINOV N F . Chemical composition of Pinus sibirica (Pinaceae)[J]. Chem Biodivers, 2015, 12 (1): 1- 53
doi: 10.1002/cbdv.v12.1
|
|
|
[5] |
ZHAN R , WU J , Ouyang J . In vitro antioxidant activities of sodium zinc and sodium iron chlorophyllins from pine needles[J]. Food Technol Biotechnol, 2014, 52 (4): 505- 510
doi: 10.17113/ftb
|
|
|
[6] |
BASHOLLI-SALIHU M , SCHUSTER R , HAJDARI A et al. Phytochemical composition, anti-inflammatory activity and cytotoxic effects of essential oils from three Pinus spp[J]. Pharm Biol, 2017, 55 (1): 1553- 1560
doi: 10.1080/13880209.2017.1309555
|
|
|
[7] |
国家药典委员会 . 中华人民共和国药典(2015年一部)[M]. 北京: 中国医药科技出版社, 2015: 206 National Pharmacopoeia Commission . People's Republic of China pharmacopoeia(2015 volume Ⅰ)[M]. Beijing: China Medical Science Press, 2015: 206
|
|
|
[8] |
聂奇华, 张志琴 . 云南松松针生药学鉴别研究[J]. 海峡药学, 2017, 29 (6): 21- 22 NIE Qihua , ZHANG Zhiqin . The pharmacognostic studies on Pinus Yunnanensis needles[J]. Strait Pharmaceutical Journal, 2017, 29 (6): 21- 22
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-3765.2017.06.009
|
|
|
[9] |
郭春晓.油松松针的化学成分和组织形态学研究[D].沈阳: 沈阳药科大学, 2009. GUO Chunxiao. Studies on chemical constituents and histomorphology of Pinus tabulaeformis Carr. needle[D]. Shenyang: Shenyang Pharmaceutical University, 2009. (in Chinese)
|
|
|
[10] |
黄璐琦, 袁媛, 袁庆军 et al. 中药分子鉴定发展中的若干问题探讨[J]. 中国中药杂志, 2014, 39 (19): 3663- 3667 HUANG Luqi , YUAN Yuan , YUAN Qingjun et al. Discussion on some problems in the development of molecular identification of Chinese traditional medicine[J]. China Journal of Chinese Materia Medica, 2014, 39 (19): 3663- 3667
|
|
|
[11] |
CHEN S , YAO H , HAN J et al. Validation of the ITS2 region as a novel DNA barcode for identifying medicinal plant species[J]. PLoS One, 2010, 5 (1): e8613
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0008613
|
|
|
[12] |
PANG X , SONG J , ZH UY et al. Applying plant DNA barcodes for Rosaceae species identification[J]. Cladistics, 2011, 27 (2): 165- 170
doi: 10.1111/cla.2011.27.issue-2
|
|
|
[13] |
朱英杰, 陈士林, 姚辉 et al. 重楼属药用植物DNA条形码鉴定研究[J]. 药学学报, 2010, 45 (3): 376- 382 ZHU Yingjie , CHEN Shilin , YAO Hui et al. DNA barcoding the medicinal plants of the genus Paris[J]. Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica, 2010, 45 (3): 376- 382
|
|
|
[14] |
夏至, 冯翠元, 高致明 et al. 黄芩及其同属近缘种的DNA条形码鉴定研究[J]. 中草药, 2014, 45 (1): 107- 112 XIA Zhi , FENG Cuiyuan , GAO Zhiming et al. Authentication of DNA barcoding of Scutellaria baicalensis and its related species[J]. Chinese Traditional and Herbal Drugs, 2014, 45 (1): 107- 112
|
|
|
[15] |
刘美子, 刘萍, 李美妮 et al. 党参及其易混伪品的ITS2分子鉴定[J]. 世界科学技术-中医药现代化, 2011, 13 (2): 412- 417 LIU Meizi , LIU Ping , LI Meini et al. ITS2 molecular identification of codonopsis pilosula and its adulterants[J]. Modernization of Traditional Chinese Medicine and Materia Medica-World Science and Technology, 2011, 13 (2): 412- 417
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-3849.2011.02.037
|
|
|
[16] |
杨慧洁, 杨世海, 张淑丽 et al. 药用植物DNA条形码研究进展[J]. 中草药, 2014, 45 (18): 2581- 2587 YANG HuiJie , YANG Shihai , ZHANG Shuli et al. Research progress on DNA barcodes of medicinal plants[J]. Chinese Traditional and Herbal Drugs, 2014, 45 (18): 2581- 2587
doi: 10.7501/j.issn.0253-2670.2014.18.001
|
|
|
[17] |
NEWMASTER S G , FAZEKAS A J , RAGUPATHY S . DNA barcoding in land plants:evaluation of rbcL in a multigene tiered approach[J]. Can J Bot, 2006, 84 (3): 335- 341
doi: 10.1139/b06-047
|
|
|
[18] |
ZHANG Z Y , YANG J B , Li D Z . Phylogenetic relationship of an extremely endangered species, Pinus squamata (Pinaceae) inferred from four sequences of the chloroplast genome and ITS of the nuclear ribosomal DNA[J]. J Integr Plant Biol, 2003, 45 (5): 530- 535
|
|
|
[19] |
胡雅琴.基于rbcL、matK基因序列探讨松科系统进化的可能性及rbcL、matK基因SSCP分析[D].西安: 陕西师范大学, 2004. HU Yaqin. The possibility of studying pinaceae phylogeny based on rbcL and matK sequences and the analysis of PCR-rbcL and PCR-matK[D]. Xi'an: Shaanxi Normal University, 2004. (in Chinese)
|
|
|
[20] |
杨辰.松属五针松组物种的分子鉴定研究[D].兰州: 兰州大学, 2014. YANG Chen. Molecular identification of species from Pinus Sect. strobus[D]. Lanzhou: Lanzhou University, 2014. (in Chinese)
|
|
|
[21] |
王柯, 陈科力, 刘震 et al. 锦葵科植物DNA条形码通用序列的筛选[J]. 植物学报, 2011, 46 (3): 276- 284 WANG Ke , CHEN Keli , LIU Zhen et al. Screening of universal DNA barcodes for malvaceae plants[J]. Chinese Bulletin of Botany, 2011, 46 (3): 276- 284
|
|
|
[22] |
周会, 荆胜利, 李刚 et al. 叶绿体基因组分析在植物系统发育中的应用[J]. 植物学研究, 2014, 3 (1): 1- 9 ZHOU Hui , JING Shengli , LI Gang et al. The Applications of chloroplast genome analysis in plant system development[J]. Botanical Research, 2014, 3 (1): 1- 9
|
|
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
|
Shared |
|
|
|
|
|
Discussed |
|
|
|
|