Please wait a minute...
浙江大学学报(医学版)  2018, Vol. 47 Issue (3): 266-271    DOI: 10.3785/j.issn.1008-9292.2018.06.08
专题报道     
胸腔镜手术治疗Ⅲ型食管闭锁合并气管食管瘘新生儿的疗效
张玉喜(),莫绪明*(),孙剑,彭卫,戚继荣,武开宏,束亚琴
南京医科大学附属儿童医院心胸外科, 江苏 南京 210008
Application of thoracoscopic surgery in repairing esophageal atresia type Ⅲ with tracheoesophageal fistula in neonates
ZHANG Yuxi(),MO Xuming*(),SUN Jian,PENG Wei,QI Jirong,WU Kaihong,SU Yaqin
Department of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, the Affiliated Children's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210008, China
 全文: PDF(1042 KB)   HTML( 7 )
摘要:

目的: 比较胸腔镜与开胸手术治疗新生儿Ⅲ型食管闭锁合并气管食管瘘的疗效。方法: 回顾性分析2012年1月至2017年12月南京医科大学附属儿童医院手术治疗的97例Ⅲ型食管闭锁合并气管食管瘘患儿的资料。根据手术方式将所有患儿分为开胸手术组(75例)和胸腔镜手术组(22例),比较两组患儿手术相关指标和术后早期并发症的发生率。结果: 所有患儿均顺利完成手术。胸腔镜手术组有1例(4.5%)患儿食管两盲端距离大于4.0 cm,且远端偏细,中转开胸并行Ⅰ期改良Livaditis食管吻合术。胸腔镜手术组的手术时间较开胸手术组延长[分别为(143±48)min和(120±40)min],但呼吸机通气时间较开胸手术组缩短[分别为(55±22)h和(65±19)h],第一次经口喂养时间较开胸手术组提前[分别为(3.2±1.1)d和(3.9±1.3)d,均P < 0.05];两组红细胞输注例数、住院时间、胸腔引流管置管时间差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。开胸手术组术后肺部并发症发生率高于胸腔镜手术组(分别为20.0%和9.1%,P < 0.01),而其他并发症发生率两组间差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。随访中开胸手术组2例患儿死亡,胸腔镜手术组无死亡。结论: 胸腔镜手术治疗Ⅲ型食管闭锁合并气管食管瘘相对于常规开胸手术具有较明显的优势,值得临床推广应用。

关键词: 食管闭锁/外科学气管食管瘘/外科学胸腔镜检查/方法婴儿, 新生治疗结果    
Abstract:

Objective: To compare the efficacy of thoracoscopic surgery versus thoracotomy in repairing esophageal atresia type Ⅲ with tracheoesophageal fistula (EA/TEF) in neonates. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted in 97 neonates who underwent EA/TEF repair between January 2012 and December 2017 in the Affiliated Children's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, including 75 patients receiving thoracotomy and 22 patients receiving thoracoscopic surgery. The perioperative data and the incidence of early postoperative complications were compared between two groups. Results: The operations were completed in all patients. One child (4.5%) in thoracoscopic surgery group was converted to thoracotomy with modified Livaditis procedure due to the long distance of two blind ends (>4 cm) and thinner distal end. The operation time was longer in thoracoscopic surgery group[(143±48) min vs. (120±40) min, P < 0.05], but the postoperative ventilation time was shorter[(55±22) h vs. (65±19) h, P < 0.05] and the first oral feeding was earlier in thoracoscopic surgery group[(3.2±1.1) d vs (3.9±1.3) d, P < 0.05]. No statistical difference was observed in the ratio of red blood cell transfusion, length of hospital stay and drainage tube indwelling time between two groups (all P>0.05). The incidence of lung complications in thoracotomy group was higher than that in thoracoscopic surgery group (20.0% vs. 9.1%, P < 0.01), while there were no significant differences in the incidence of other postoperative complications between two groups. There was no death in thoracoscopic surgery group, while 2 patients died in thoracotomy group. Conclusion: Thoracoscopic repair is a preferred surgical procedure for EA/TEF in neonates.

Key words: Esophageal atresia/surgery    Tracheoesophageal fistula/surgery    Thoracoscopy/methods    Infant, newborn    Treatment outcome
收稿日期: 2018-03-23 出版日期: 2018-09-18
CLC:  R628  
基金资助: 江苏省妇幼健康科研项目(F201611)
通讯作者: 莫绪明     E-mail: fanli0.618@163.com;mohsuming15@sina.com
作者简介: 张玉喜(1983-), 男, 博士研究生, 住院医师, 主要从事小儿心胸外科疾病相关临床研究; E-mail:fanli0.618@163.com; https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8320-0072
服务  
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章  
张玉喜
莫绪明
孙剑
彭卫
戚继荣
武开宏
束亚琴

引用本文:

张玉喜,莫绪明,孙剑,彭卫,戚继荣,武开宏,束亚琴. 胸腔镜手术治疗Ⅲ型食管闭锁合并气管食管瘘新生儿的疗效[J]. 浙江大学学报(医学版), 2018, 47(3): 266-271.

ZHANG Yuxi,MO Xuming,SUN Jian,PENG Wei,QI Jirong,WU Kaihong,SU Yaqin. Application of thoracoscopic surgery in repairing esophageal atresia type Ⅲ with tracheoesophageal fistula in neonates. J Zhejiang Univ (Med Sci), 2018, 47(3): 266-271.

链接本文:

http://www.zjujournals.com/med/CN/10.3785/j.issn.1008-9292.2018.06.08        http://www.zjujournals.com/med/CN/Y2018/V47/I3/266

[${\bar x}$±sn(%)]
组别 n 体质量(kg) 手术时年龄(d) 男性/女性(n) 孕周(周) 合并肺炎 Gross分型 Spitz分型[5] 合并症
Ⅲa Ⅲb 先天性心脏病* VACTERL综合征 唐氏综合征 其他
“—”无相关数据;*包括动脉导管未闭、室间隔缺损、房间隔缺损、右心室双出口和法洛四联症.
开胸手术组 75 2.3±0.6 3.8±3.8 49/26 37.7±2.1 18(24.0) 35(46.7) 40(53.3) 52(69.3) 13(17.3) 10(13.3) 27(36.0) 4(5.3) 3(4.0) 8(10.7)
胸腔镜手术组 22 2.5±0.7 4.1±4.0 11/11 37.4±2.1 5(22.7) 10(45.5) 12(54.5) 11(50.0) 6(27.3) 5(22.7) 5(22.7) 2(9.1) 1(4.5) 2(9.1)
χ2/t 1.452 0.354 0.146 0.447 0.575 0.558 2.808 0.183 0.412 0.649 0.595
P >0.05 >0.05 >0.05 >0.05 >0.05 >0.05 >0.05 >0.05 >0.05 >0.05 >0.05
表 1  开胸手术组与胸腔镜手术组一般临床资料比较
[${\bar x}$±sn(%)]
组别 n 手术时间(min) 红细胞输注例数 住院时间(d) 呼吸机通气时间(h) 胸腔引流管置管时间(d) 第一次经口喂养时间(d)
“—”无相关数据.
开胸手术组 75 120±40 6(8.0) 15±3 65±19 6.5±2.1 3.9±1.3
胸腔镜手术组 22 143±48 1(4.5) 12±4 55±22 6.3±2.0 3.2±1.1
χ2/t 2.518 0.499 3.810 2.093 0.397 2.294
P <0.05 >0.05 >0.05 <0.05 >0.05 <0.05
表 2  开胸手术组和胸腔镜手术组术中和术后相关指标比较
[n(%)]
组别 n 肺部并发症* 气管狭窄 吻合口瘘 吻合口狭窄 胃食管反流
“—”无相关数据.*包括肺炎、肺不张等.
开胸手术组 75 15(20.0) 3(4.0) 7(9.3) 32(42.7) 8(10.7)
胸腔镜手术组 22 2(9.1) 1(4.5) 2(9.1) 8(36.4) 1(4.5)
χ2 0.146 0.197 0.668 0.392 0.348
P <0.01 >0.05 >0.05 >0.05 >0.05
表 3  开胸手术组和胸腔镜手术组术后早期并发症发生率比较
1 ROTHENBERG S S . Thoracoscopic repair of tracheoesophageal fistula in newborns[J]. J Pediatr Surg, 2002, 37 (6): 869- 872
doi: 10.1053/jpsu.2002.32891
2 VAN DER ZEE D C , BAX K N . Thoracoscopic treatment of esophageal atresia with distal fistula and of tracheomalacia[J]. Semin Pediatr Surg, 2007, 16 (4): 224- 230
doi: 10.1053/j.sempedsurg.2007.06.003
3 莫绪明 . 小儿电视胸腔镜手术的发展与展望[J]. 临床小儿外科杂志, 2016, 15 (4): 322- 325
MO Xuming . Perspectives and developments of pediatric telecision thoracoscopy[J]. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Surgery, 2016, 15 (4): 322- 325
4 GROSS R . The surgery of infancy and childhood. Philadelphia and London[J]. Wb Saynders, 1960, 211
5 SPITZ L , KIELY E M , MORECROFT J A et al. Oesophageal atresia:at-risk groups for the 1990s[J]. J Pediatr Surg, 1994, 29 (6): 723- 725
doi: 10.1016/0022-3468(94)90354-9
6 LOBE T E , ROTHENBERG S , WALDSCHMIDT J et al. Thoracoscopic repair of esophageal atresia in an infant:a surgical first[J]. Pediatr Endo Innov Tech, 2000, 3 (3): 141- 148
7 ROTHENBERG S . Thoracoscopic repair of a tracheoesophageal fistula in neonate[J]. Pediatr Endosurg Innovative Tech, 2000, 4 150- 156
8 PATKOWSK D , RYSIAKIEWICZ K , JAWORSKI W et al. Thoracoscopic repair of tracheoesophageal fistula and esophageal atresia[J]. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A, 2009, 19 (Suppl 1): S19- S22
9 DINGEMANN C , URE B M . Minimally invasive repair of esophageal atresia:an update[J]. Eur J Pediatr Surg, 2013, 23 (3): 198- 203
doi: 10.1055/s-00000015
10 BORRUTO F A , IMPELLIZZERI P , MONTALTO A S et al. Thoracoscopy versus thoracotomy for esophageal atresia and tracheoesophageal fistula repair:review of the literature and meta-analysis[J]. Eur J Pediatr Surg, 2012, 22 (6): 415- 419
doi: 10.1055/s-00000015
11 FONTE J , BARROSO C , LAMAS-PINHEIRO R et al. Anatomic thoracoscopic repair of esophageal atresia[J]. Front Pediatr, 2016, 4 142
12 LUGO B , MALHOTRA A , GUNER Y et al. Thoracoscopic versus open repair of tracheoesophageal fistula and esophageal atresia[J]. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A, 2008, 18 (5): 753- 756
doi: 10.1089/lap.2007.0220
13 YAMOTO M , URUSIHARA N , FUKUMOTO K et al. Thoracoscopic versus open repair of esophageal atresia with tracheoesophageal fistula at a single institution[J]. Pediatr Surg Int, 2014, 30 (9): 883- 887
doi: 10.1007/s00383-014-3554-2
14 KUNISAKI S M , POWELSON I A , HAYDAR B et al. Thoracoscopic vs open lobectomy in infants and young children with congenital lung malformations[J]. J Am Coll Surg, 2014, 218 (2): 261- 270
doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.10.010
15 RON O , DE COPPI P , PIERRO A . The surgical approach to esophageal atresia repair and the management of long-gap atresia:results of a survey[J]. Semin Pediatr Surg, 2009, 18 (1): 44- 49
doi: 10.1053/j.sempedsurg.2008.10.009
16 HOLCOMB G W , ROTHENBERG S S , BAX K M et al. Thoracoscopic repair of esophageal atresia and tracheoesophageal fistula:a multi-institutional analysis[J]. Ann Surg, 2005, 242 (3): 422- 430
17 FATHI M , JOUDI M , MORTEZA A . Evaluating necessity of azygos vein ligation in primary repair of esophageal atresia[J]. Indian J Surg, 2015, 77 (Suppl 2): 543- 545
18 KROSNAR S , BAXTER A . Thoracoscopic repair of esophageal atresia with tracheoesophageal fistula:anesthetic and intensive care management of a series of eight neonates[J]. Paediatr Anaesth, 2005, 15 (7): 541- 546
doi: 10.1111/pan.2005.15.issue-7
19 FABILA T S , MENGHRAJ S J . One lung ventilation strategies for infants and children undergoing video assisted thoracoscopic surgery[J]. Indian J Anaesth, 2013, 57 (4): 339- 344
doi: 10.4103/0019-5049.118539
20 STOLWIJK L J , TYTGAT S H , KEUNEN K et al. The effects of CO2-insufflation with 5 and 10 mmHg during thoracoscopy on cerebral oxygenation and hemodynamics in piglets:an animal experimental study[J]. Surg Endosc, 2015, 29 (9): 272- 278
21 HOLCOMB G W 3RD . Thoracoscopic surgery for esophageal atresia[J]. Pediatr Surg Int, 2017, 33 (4): 475- 481
doi: 10.1007/s00383-016-4049-0
[1] 吕成杰,胡东来,黄寿奖,秦琪,赵晓霞,胡书奇,张雅楠,方旋,郭晓东,钭金法. 经脐单部位腹腔镜手术治疗新生儿先天性十二指肠梗阻的疗效和安全性观察[J]. 浙江大学学报(医学版), 2018, 47(3): 261-265.
[2] 张士松,武玉睿,刘红真,翟允鹏,刘威. 复杂型先天性肠闭锁患儿治疗体会[J]. 浙江大学学报(医学版), 2018, 47(3): 255-260.
[3] 黄婷,张晓乐,梁靓,谭征,高跃,李建华,舒强. 腔镜手术治疗肺隔离症患儿47例[J]. 浙江大学学报(医学版), 2018, 47(3): 272-277.
[4] 徐玮泽,叶菁菁,李建华,张泽伟,俞建根,石卓,俞劲,舒强. 单纯食管超声心动图引导经皮房间隔缺损封堵术治疗房间隔缺损患儿的疗效[J]. 浙江大学学报(医学版), 2018, 47(3): 244-249.
[5] 祝子逸,郦志军,何正富,王云震. 内镜引导下吻合口瘘冲洗治疗食管胃吻合口瘘合并瘘旁脓肿临床疗效观察[J]. 浙江大学学报(医学版), 2017, 46(6): 637-642.
[6] 陆薇,林梦娜,赵士芳,王慧明,何福明. 改良侧壁开窗式上颌窦底提升术治疗上颌后牙区缺牙伴重度骨萎缩患者临床观察[J]. 浙江大学学报(医学版), 2017, 46(6): 630-636.
[7] 张思影 等. CT和磁共振参数反应图在肿瘤精准疗效评估中的研究进展[J]. 浙江大学学报(医学版), 2017, 46(5): 468-472.
[8] 潘静颖 等. PET-CT与乳腺癌分子病理分型、治疗反应及预后的相关性研究进展[J]. 浙江大学学报(医学版), 2017, 46(5): 473-480.
[9] 邹丽霞 等. 人源化白细胞介素-6受体抗体治疗全身型幼年特发性关节炎的疗效及安全性[J]. 浙江大学学报(医学版), 2017, 46(4): 421-426.
[10] 张美霞 等. 静脉溶栓获益的最大梗死体积阈值与急性缺血性卒中患者发病时间的关系[J]. 浙江大学学报(医学版), 2017, 46(4): 384-389.
[11] 翁露茜,宋晓佳,李娟,刘彭若峰,林军. 腭中缝骨皮质切开辅助快速扩弓矫治15~25岁上颌横向宽度不足患者临床研究[J]. 浙江大学学报(医学版), 2017, 46(2): 198-205.
[12] 陈刚,张鼎,应亚草,王志峰,陶伟,朱皓,张景峰,彭志毅. 国产载药微球经动脉化疗栓塞治疗不可切除原发性肝癌的临床研究[J]. 浙江大学学报(医学版), 2017, 46(1): 44-51.
[13] 夏光发 等. 新辅助化疗前后激素受体变化的乳腺癌患者辅助内分泌治疗的疗效[J]. 浙江大学学报(医学版), 2016, 45(6): 614-619.
[14] 李文波 等. 手术和非手术治疗老年人肱骨近端三、四部分骨折疗效的meta分析[J]. 浙江大学学报(医学版), 2016, 45(6): 641-647.
[15] 何斌 等. 贝伐珠单克隆抗体在难治性子宫颈癌中的应用进展[J]. 浙江大学学报(医学版), 2016, 45(4): 395-402.