Please wait a minute...
浙江大学学报(医学版)  1997, Vol. 26 Issue (1): 10-12    DOI: 10.3785/j.issn.1008-9292.1997.01.004
论著     
三种男性绝育方法的比较研究
朱选文, 陈昭典, 孙冠浩, 沈柏华, 沈乃仙, 王红萍, 张华
浙江医科大学附属第一医院泌尿外科
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON THREE METHODS OF MALE STERILIZATION,A REPORT OF 300 CASES
Zhu Xuanwen, Chen Zhaodian, Sun Guanhao, et al
Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Medical University
 全文: PDF(282 KB)   HTML (
摘要:

输精管绝育方法仍是当前男性节育的主要措施,目前颇有影响的3种绝育方法是直视钳穿输精管结扎术(NSV)、输精管注射粘堵法(CVO)、输精管注射栓堵法(MPU)。先前由于没有采用统一的标准,影响了对3种绝育方法的有效性、安全性、可复性的评估。为此,作者按统一标准对3种方法进行前瞻性比较研究,结果表明,NSV节育有效率为98.00%,CVO为89.61%,MPU为93.87%,并发症的发生率经术后2年随访显示3种方法无明显差异。

关键词: 性绝育输精管切除术输精管注射粘堵法输精管注射栓堵法    
Abstract:

Vasal sterilization is the main method for male birth control. The main methods which have drawn great interest are no-scalped vasectomy(NSV),chemical vas occlusion(CVO) and MPU-vas occlusion(MPU). Nevertheless,there exist different views as to which method is the best one in terms of effectiveness, safety and reversibility. Hence, this study purports to evaluate these three methods of male sterilization by using uniform criteria in order to provide a better method.The result has indicated the birth control to be rates 98.00%, 89.61% and 93.87% in the groups of NSV,CVO and MPU respectively. The complication rate was of no statistical difference in the three groups during the two-year follow-up.

Key words: Sterilization,sexnal    Vasectomy    CVO    MPU
收稿日期: 1996-03-08 出版日期: 1997-01-25
基金资助:

国家计生委P25资助项目(WHO90807)

服务  
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章  

引用本文:

朱选文, 陈昭典, 孙冠浩, 沈柏华, 沈乃仙, 王红萍, 张华. 三种男性绝育方法的比较研究[J]. 浙江大学学报(医学版), 1997, 26(1): 10-12.

Zhu Xuanwen, Chen Zhaodian, Sun Guanhao, et al. COMPARATIVE STUDY ON THREE METHODS OF MALE STERILIZATION,A REPORT OF 300 CASES. Journal of ZheJiang University(Medical Science), 1997, 26(1): 10-12.

链接本文:

https://www.zjujournals.com/med/CN/10.3785/j.issn.1008-9292.1997.01.004        https://www.zjujournals.com/med/CN/Y1997/V26/I1/10

No related articles found!