Please wait a minute...
浙江大学学报(医学版)  2019, Vol. 48 Issue (6): 651-656    DOI: 10.3785/j.issn.1008-9292.2019.12.10
原著     
内、外侧联合双柱内固定治疗23例肩胛骨体部移位骨折患者疗效分析
高明暄(),聂德军,常彦峰,谢伟强,王悦,普星宇,张伟,骆文远*()
甘肃省人民医院骨三科, 甘肃 兰州 730000
Internal fixation of lateral and medial borders for displaced scapular body fractures via minimally invasive approach: results of 23 cases
GAO Mingxuan(),NIE Dejun,CHANG Yanfeng,XIE Weiqiang,WANG Yue,PU Xingyu,ZHANG Wei,LUO Wenyuan*()
Third Department of Orthopedics, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou 730000, China
 全文: PDF(3118 KB)   HTML( 5 )
摘要:

目的: 分析内、外侧微创切口双柱固定治疗肩胛骨体部移位骨折的临床疗效。方法: 2014年1月至2018年6月采用内、外侧微创切口手术治疗肩胛骨体部移位骨折患者23例。外侧切口:沿肩胛骨外侧缘、外柱骨折线向上牵开三角肌后部,自小圆肌与冈下肌间隙显露出肩胛骨外缘。内侧切口:沿肩胛骨内侧缘、内柱骨折线顺斜方肌纤维分离,经菱形肌与冈下肌肩胛骨附丽点间隙分离进入,显露肩胛骨内侧缘。两柱均用钢板螺丝钉进行框架式内固定。结果: 除1例患者的切口脂肪液化经二次处理后愈合,其余所有患者切口一期愈合。骨折肩胛骨盂极角术前为(25±12)°,术后为(41±5)°,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.01)。骨折愈合时间为3~8个月,平均(4.4±1.3)个月。结论: 采用内、外侧联合双柱内固定手术治疗肩胛骨体部移位骨折便于骨折显露、复位和可靠固定,且软组织剥离少,患者骨折愈合率高,功能恢复良好。

关键词: 骨折/外科学肩胛骨/损伤骨折固定术, 内/方法最小侵入性外科手术治疗结果骨折/外科学肩胛骨/损伤骨折固定术, 内/方法最小侵入性外科手术治疗结果    
Abstract:

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of internal fixation of lateral and medial borders for displaced scapular body fractures via the minimally invasive approach. Methods: The internal fixation of lateral and medial borders via minimally invasive approach was applied in surgical treatment of 23 patients with scapular body comminuted fractures from January 2014 to June 2018. The lateral approach was made straightly orienting over the lateral border of scapula. The dissection was taken down to the deltoid fascia. The deltoid was retracted cephalically, revealing the external rotators. Blunt dissection was used down to the lateral border between infraspinatus and teres minor, exposing the fracture site. The medial incision was done along the medial border of the scapula over site of the fracture. Dissections were taken down to the fascia and the periosteum. A subperiosteal dissection was then performed to elevate the infraspinatus to the degree necessary to visualize the fracture. The medial and lateral borders of scapula body were fixed with plates and screws in a frame-like way. Results: One patient developed the delayed healing of the incisions due to liquefactive fat necrosis. The other 22 patients showed no complications of the incisions. The glenopolar angle (GPA) of fractured scapula was increased from preoperative (25±12) degrees to postoperative (41±5) degrees (P < 0.01). The healing time of fractures healed was 3-8 months, with an average time of (4.4±1.3) months. Conclusion: The lateral-medial combined fixation through minimally invasive surgical approach for the scapula body fractures allows visualization of fracture reduction without extensive muscular or subcutaneous flaps, and is associated with successful fracture healing and high functional scores of the shoulder.

Key words: Fractures, bone/surgery    Scapula/injuries    Fracture fixation, internal/methods    Minimally invasive surgical procedures    Treatment outcome    Fractures, bone/surgery    Scapula/injuries    Fracture fixation, internal/methods    Minimally invasive surgical procedures    Treatment outcome
收稿日期: 2019-06-30 出版日期: 2020-01-19
CLC:  R683.41  
基金资助: 甘肃省自然科学基金(1308RJZA210);甘肃省自然科学基金(1308RJZA210)
通讯作者: 骆文远     E-mail: mingxuangao77@163.com;wenyuanluo1966@163.com
作者简介: 高明暄(1977-), 男, 博士, 副主任医师, 硕士生导师, 主要从事关节骨病及创伤骨科基础与临床研究, E-mail:mingxuangao77@163.com; https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8400-7581|高明暄(1977-), 男, 博士, 副主任医师, 硕士生导师, 主要从事关节骨病及创伤骨科基础与临床研究, E-mail:mingxuangao77@163.com; https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8400-7581
服务  
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章  
高明暄
聂德军
常彦峰
谢伟强
王悦
普星宇
张伟
骆文远

引用本文:

高明暄,聂德军,常彦峰,谢伟强,王悦,普星宇,张伟,骆文远. 内、外侧联合双柱内固定治疗23例肩胛骨体部移位骨折患者疗效分析[J]. 浙江大学学报(医学版), 2019, 48(6): 651-656.

GAO Mingxuan,NIE Dejun,CHANG Yanfeng,XIE Weiqiang,WANG Yue,PU Xingyu,ZHANG Wei,LUO Wenyuan. Internal fixation of lateral and medial borders for displaced scapular body fractures via minimally invasive approach: results of 23 cases. J Zhejiang Univ (Med Sci), 2019, 48(6): 651-656.

链接本文:

http://www.zjujournals.com/med/CN/10.3785/j.issn.1008-9292.2019.12.10        http://www.zjujournals.com/med/CN/Y2019/V48/I6/651

例序 性别 年龄(岁) 致伤原因 肩胛骨骨折左/右侧 合并外伤 AO分型 Bartoníček分型 骨折描述
外柱移位(mm) 成角畸形(°) 盂极角GPA(°) 术后盂极角GPA(°)
AO:内固定研究协会.
1 74 10 m高处跌落 右2-8肋多发骨折,右肺挫伤 14B2 (l, m) D 18 35 15 38
2 49 重物砸伤 右3-7、左7-8多发肋骨骨折,双肺挫伤,胸8、11压缩骨折 14B2 (l, m,g) A 35 15 40 43
3 41 机动车相撞,司机 右腋部皮肤脱套、右肱骨干骨折、右臂丛损伤 14B2 (l, m) C 32 30 23 45
4 47 重物砸伤 右3-6多发肋骨骨折,右肺挫伤并胸腔积液 14B2 (l, m, g) C 23 35 31 41
5 55 行人被机动车撞伤 右1-4多发肋骨骨折,右肺挫伤并胸腔积液、肺不张;左眼外伤 14B2 (l, m, g) D 19 32 17 35
6 43 行人被机动车撞伤 右2-7多发肋骨骨折,右肺挫伤并胸腔积液、肺不张、气胸;肝挫伤,腹腔少量积液 14 B2 (l, m, g) C 33 15 13 38
7 60 3m高处跌落 14B2 (l, m) C 41 22 33 48
8 30 机动车相撞事故,乘客 左第4肋骨、左肺挫伤、胸腔积液,左L1-L4横突骨折,左髋臼骨折,右髋臼骨折 14B2 (l, m) C 50 45 20 45
9 52 13 m高处跌落 14B2 (l, m) D 25 35 22 39
10 64 行人被机动车撞伤 左肱骨大结节撕脱骨折并肩关节脱位 14B2 (l, m) C 22 13 32 47
11 49 重物砸伤 右3-7、左7-8多发肋骨骨折,双肺挫伤,胸8、11压缩骨折 14B2 (l, m,g) A 35 15 40 43
12 33 4m高处跌落 左7-9多发肋骨骨折,左肺挫伤,左侧气肺、肺不张 14B2 (l, m) D 31 10 22 38
13 48 3m高处跌落 14B2 (l, m) A 28 15 30 42
14 46 重物砸伤 14B2 (l, m) A 35 38 18 33
15 48 行人被机动车撞伤 左3-6多发肋骨骨折,左肺挫伤,左侧胸腔积液 14B2(l, m) C 22 40 45 50
16 39 机动车相撞事故,司机 右肺挫伤,右胸腔积液;左股骨粗隆间骨折 14B2(l, m) B 53 12 8 41
17 46 重物砸伤 14B2(l, m) A 21 9 46 47
18 61 3m高处跌落 左肺挫伤,左胸腔积液 14B2 (l, m) A 32 11 10 31
19 51 机动车翻车事故,乘员 双肺挫伤,双胸腔积液 14B2 (l, m) C 47 24 31 40
20 48 机动车相撞事故,司机 左5肋骨骨折,胸10压缩骨折 14B2 (l, m) A 33 16 13 45
21 39 机动车撞墙事故,司机 14B2 (l, m) A 38 10 7 36
22 33 重物砸伤 14B2 (l, m) A 44 22 11 42
23 51 机动车相撞事故,乘员 双侧5-7肋骨骨折,双胸腔积液,右股骨干骨的 14B2 (l, m,g) C 8 36 38 41
附表 1  23例肩胛骨体部骨折患者的临床资料
图 1  内、外侧联合双柱内固定治疗肩胛骨体部移位骨折典型病例
例序 内侧/外侧切口(cm) 术中出血量(mL) 骨折愈合时间(月) 末次随访Constant-Murley评分 随访时间(月) 并发症
患侧 健侧
1 8/15 80 4 83 92 12
2 4/10 350 6 96 96 16
3 5/10 230 5 85 100 40 切口脂肪液化
4 4/6 100 8 87 96 14
5 5/7 130 6 78 94 16
6 4/8 200 4 87 100 23
7 4/10 60 4 81 87 54
8 4/14 100 3 94 100 10
9 8/13 90 3 92 96 12
10 4/8 200 5 83 73 22 内侧内固定刺激软组织
11 4/11 170 3 89 96 54
12 8/13 220 5 92 98 24 内侧内固定刺激软组织
13 5/10 100 4 100 100 12
14 4/8 80 5 96 98 32
15 5/7 80 4 88 92 13
16 6/11 230 4 96 100 31
17 4/7 100 3 98 100 23
18 5/12 250 4 92 96 18
19 4/10 300 5 88 92 22
20 4/10 150 3 98 98 50
21 5/9 80 3 100 100 46
22 5/10 130 4 96 98 44
23 8/17 550 6 88 92 23
附表 2  内、外侧联合双柱内固定治疗肩胛骨体部骨折患者的手术和随访信息
1 贾健 . 肩胛骨骨折的分类及手术治疗[J]. 中华骨科杂志, 2003, 23 (2): 100- 104
JIA Jian . The classification and operative treatment of scapula fractures[J]. Chinese Journal of Orthopaedics, 2003, 23 (2): 100- 104
doi: 10.3760/j.issn:0253-2352.2003.02.010
2 COLE P A , FREEMAN G , DUBIN J R . Scapula fractures[J]. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med, 2013, 6 (1): 79- 87
doi: 10.1007/s12178-012-9151-x
3 付中国, 张堃 . Judet入路治疗肩胛骨骨折[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2014, 2 (1): 57- 62
FU Zhongguo , ZHANG Kun . The treatment of scapula fractures via Judet approach[J]. Chinese Journal of Shoulder and Elbow(Electronic Edition), 2014, 2 (1): 57- 62
4 张浩, 刘智 . 肩胛骨骨折的诊断与治疗[J]. 中国骨伤, 2011, 24 (10): 881- 883
ZHANG Hao , LIU Zhi . Diagnosis and treatment of scapula fractures[J]. China Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, 2011, 24 (10): 881- 883
5 BARTONí?EK J , FRI? V . Scapular body fractures:results of operative treatment[J]. Int Orthop, 2011, 35 (5): 747- 753
doi: 10.1007/s00264-010-1072-y
6 ANAVIAN J , CONFLITTI J M , KHANNA G et al. A reliable radiographic measurement technique for extra-articular scapular fractures[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2011, 469 (12): 3371- 3378
doi: 10.1007/s11999-011-1820-3
7 GAUGER E M , COLE P A . Surgical technique:a minimally invasive approach to scapula neck and body fractures[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2011, 469 (12): 3390- 3399
doi: 10.1007/s11999-011-1970-3
8 MEINBERG E G , AGEL J , ROBERTS C S et al. Fracture and dislocation classification Compendium-2018[J]. J Orthop Trauma, 2018, 32 Suppl 1 S1- S170
9 BARTONíCEK J , TUCEK M , LUNáCEK L . Judet posterior approach to the scapula[J]. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech, 2008, 75 (6): 429- 435
10 AO R , YU B , ZHU Y et al. Single lateral versus medial and lateral plates for treating displaced scapular body fractures:a retrospective comparative study[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2018, 27 (2): 231- 236
doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2017.07.028
11 COLE P A J R, GILBERTSON J A, SR C P A. Functionaloutcomes of operative management of scapula fractures in a geriatric cohort[J/OL]. J Orthop Trauma, 2017, 31(1): e1-e8.
12 WIJDICKS C A , ARMITAGE B M , ANAVIAN J et al. Vulnerableneurovasculature with a posterior approach to the scapula[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2009, 467 (8): 2011- 2017
doi: 10.1007/s11999-008-0635-3
13 STEPHENS N G , MORGAN A S , CORVO P et al. Significance of scapular fracture in the blunt-trauma patient[J]. Ann Emerg Med, 1995, 26 (4): 439- 442
doi: 10.1016/S0196-0644(95)70111-7
14 VEYSI V T , MITTAL R , AGARWAL S et al. Multiple trauma and scapula fractures:so what?[J]. J Trauma, 2003, 55 (6): 1145- 1147
doi: 10.1097/01.TA.0000044499.76736.9D
15 BALDWIN K D , OHMAN-STRICKLAND P , MEHTA S et al. Scapula fractures:a marker for concomitant injury? A retrospective review of data in the National Trauma Database[J]. J Trauma, 2008, 65 (2): 430- 435
doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31817fd928
16 GOTTSCHALK H P , BROWNE R H , STARR A J . Shoulder girdle:patterns of trauma and associated injuries[J]. J Orthop Trauma, 2011, 25 (5): 266- 271
doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e3181e47975
17 GOSENS T , SPEIGNER B , MINEKUS J . Fracture of the scapular body:functional outcome after conservative treatment[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2009, 18 (3): 443- 448
doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2009.01.030
18 BAUER G , FLEISCHMANN W , DUSSLER E . Displaced scapular fractures:indication and long-term results of open reduction and internal fixation[J]. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 1995, 114 (4): 215- 219
19 COLE P A , TALBOT M , SCHRODER L K et al. Extra-articular malunions of the scapula:a comparison of functional outcome before and after reconstruction[J]. J Orthop Trauma, 2011, 25 (11): 649- 656
doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e31820af67f
20 HARMER L S , PHELPS K D , CRICKARD C V et al. A comparison of exposure between the classic and modified Judet approaches to the scapula[J]. J Orthop Trauma, 2016, 30 (5): 235- 239
doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000486
21 LANTRY J M , ROBERTS C S , GIANNOUDIS P V . Operative treatment of scapular fractures:a systematic review[J]. Injury, 2008, 39 (3): 271- 283
doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2007.06.018
22 彭小军, 孟春庆, 陈伟 et al. 肩胛骨骨折的分类及微创手术入路的应用疗效分析[J]. 临床急诊杂志, 2013, 14 (10): 481- 483
PENG Xiaojun , MENG Chunqing , CHEN Wei et al. The classification of scapular fractures and the efficacy analysis of minimally invasive surgical approach[J]. Journal of Clinical Emergency, 2013, 14 (10): 481- 483
[1] 张丽凤,杨慧,张信美,陈正云. 左炔诺孕酮宫内节育系统治疗子宫腺肌病患者的疗效和不良反应观察[J]. 浙江大学学报(医学版), 2019, 48(2): 130-135.
[2] 楼俊瑶,黄秀峰,张丽凤,徐萍,张信美,陈正云. 第二代子宫内膜消融术可提高左炔诺孕酮宫内节育系统对子宫腺肌病患者的疗效[J]. 浙江大学学报(医学版), 2019, 48(2): 136-141.
[3] 余钻标,林作栋,郎德海. 经皮机械血栓清除联合支架植入治疗急性髂股静脉血栓形成患者中远期疗效评估[J]. 浙江大学学报(医学版), 2018, 47(6): 623-627.
[4] 沈宏,季峰. 无X射线监视内镜下消化道支架置入治疗消化道狭窄的疗效和安全性[J]. 浙江大学学报(医学版), 2018, 47(6): 643-650.
[5] 尹孝亮,郎德海,王迪. 经皮机械血栓清除治疗急性髂股静脉血栓形成患者疗效观察[J]. 浙江大学学报(医学版), 2018, 47(6): 588-594.
[6] 王晓辉,何杨燕,吴子衡,张鸿坤. 一体化微创手术治疗髂静脉压迫综合征伴下肢静脉曲张患者疗效观察[J]. 浙江大学学报(医学版), 2018, 47(6): 577-582.
[7] 林作栋,郎德海. 经皮机械血栓清除联合球囊血管成形治疗髂股静脉血栓形成患者疗效分析[J]. 浙江大学学报(医学版), 2018, 47(6): 595-600.
[8] 邓璇,何寒青,周洋,潘金仁,严睿,唐学雯,符剑. 水痘疫苗不同免疫策略的卫生经济学评价[J]. 浙江大学学报(医学版), 2018, 47(4): 374-380.
[9] 张玉喜,莫绪明,孙剑,彭卫,戚继荣,武开宏,束亚琴. 胸腔镜手术治疗Ⅲ型食管闭锁合并气管食管瘘新生儿的疗效[J]. 浙江大学学报(医学版), 2018, 47(3): 266-271.
[10] 吕成杰,胡东来,黄寿奖,秦琪,赵晓霞,胡书奇,张雅楠,方旋,郭晓东,钭金法. 经脐单部位腹腔镜手术治疗新生儿先天性十二指肠梗阻的疗效和安全性观察[J]. 浙江大学学报(医学版), 2018, 47(3): 261-265.
[11] 张士松,武玉睿,刘红真,翟允鹏,刘威. 复杂型先天性肠闭锁患儿治疗体会[J]. 浙江大学学报(医学版), 2018, 47(3): 255-260.
[12] 徐玮泽,叶菁菁,李建华,张泽伟,俞建根,石卓,俞劲,舒强. 单纯食管超声心动图引导经皮房间隔缺损封堵术治疗房间隔缺损患儿的疗效[J]. 浙江大学学报(医学版), 2018, 47(3): 244-249.
[13] 陆薇,林梦娜,赵士芳,王慧明,何福明. 改良侧壁开窗式上颌窦底提升术治疗上颌后牙区缺牙伴重度骨萎缩患者临床观察[J]. 浙江大学学报(医学版), 2017, 46(6): 630-636.
[14] 祝子逸,郦志军,何正富,王云震. 内镜引导下吻合口瘘冲洗治疗食管胃吻合口瘘合并瘘旁脓肿临床疗效观察[J]. 浙江大学学报(医学版), 2017, 46(6): 637-642.
[15] 张思影 等. CT和磁共振参数反应图在肿瘤精准疗效评估中的研究进展[J]. 浙江大学学报(医学版), 2017, 46(5): 468-472.