Please wait a minute...
浙江大学学报(医学版)  2019, Vol. 48 Issue (2): 174-179    DOI: 10.3785/j.issn.1008-9292.2019.04.08
原著     
妊娠期正常高值血压产妇体质量及妊娠结局的回顾性分析
孙婷1,2(),徐明娟1,*()
1. 海军军医大学附属长海医院妇产科, 上海 200433
2. 上海市松江区妇幼保健院妇产科, 上海 201620
Body weight and gestational outcomes in women with high normotension during pregnancy
SUN Ting1,2(),XU Mingjuan1,*()
1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Changhai Hospital, Navy Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China
2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Songjiang District Maternal and Child Hospital, Shanghai 201620, China
 全文: PDF(914 KB)   HTML( 9 )
摘要:

目的: 研究妊娠期正常高值血压产妇的孕前体质指数、孕期体质量增加及妊娠结局。方法: 回顾性分析2015-2017年在上海市松江区妇幼保健院产检并分娩的妊娠期正常高值血压、正常血压、妊娠期高血压疾病(HDP)各500例产妇的临床资料,比较三组孕前体质指数、孕期体质量增加及妊娠结局,并分析三者的相关性。结果: 正常高值血压组、正常血压组孕前体质指数、孕期体质量增加差异有统计学意义(均P < 0.017);正常高值血压组、HDP组孕前体质指数差异有统计学意义(P < 0.017)。妊娠不良结局方面,除早产率略低于正常血压组外,羊水过少、胎盘早剥、产后出血、胎儿窘迫和小于孕龄儿的发生率正常高值血压组与正常血压组差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.017);HDP组羊水过少、胎盘早剥、剖宫产、产后出血、早产和小于孕龄儿的发生率均高于正常高值血压组,差异均有统计学意义(均P < 0.01)。孕期正常高值血压的产妇不良妊娠结局亚组孕期体质量增加过少及过多的比例均高于无不良妊娠结局亚组产妇,孕期体质量增加正常的比例低于无不良妊娠结局亚组,差异有统计学意义(均P < 0.01)。结论: 孕前体质指数、孕期体质量增加与孕期血压水平和妊娠结局相关,合理干预妊娠期正常高值血压孕妇的孕期体质量对改善不良妊娠结局有一定意义。

关键词: 妊娠人体质量指数高血压, 妊娠性体重妊娠结局回顾性研究    
Abstract:

Objective: To investigate the pre-pregnancy body mass index(BMI), gestational weight gain(GWG)and gestational outcomes in women with high normotension during pregnancy. Methods: The clinical data of 1500 pregnant women who recieved antenatal care and delivered in Songjiang District Maternal and Child Hospital, Shanghai from 2015 to 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. The women were divided into high normotension group, normotension group and hypertensive disorder of pregnancy (HDP) group with 500 cases in each group. The general information, pre-pregnancy body mass index, gestational weight gain and gestational outcomes were analyzed. Results: There were significant differences in pre-pregnancy BMI and GWG between the high normotension group and the normotension group (all P < 0.017), and there was significant difference in pre-pregnancy BMI between the high normotension group and HDP group (P < 0.017). In terms of adverse pregnancy outcomes, the incidence of oligohydramnios, placental abruption, postpartum hemorrhage, fetal distress and small for gestational age infant were higher in the high normotension group than those in the normotension group, but the differences were not of statistical significance (all P>0.017); the incidence of oligohydramnios, placental abruption, cesarean section, postpartum hemorrhage, premature delivery and small for gestational age infant in HDP group were higher than those in high normotension group (all P < 0.01). In high normotension women with adverse gestational outcomes, the proportion of low GWG or too much GWG was higher and the proportion of normal GWG was lower than those in high normotension women without adverse gestational outcomes (all P < 0.01). Conclusions: Pre-pregnancy BMI and GWG are correlated with pregnancy blood pressure and gestational outcomes. Reasonable intervention to gestational weight gain of pregnant women with high normotension is of significance to improve the gestational outcomes.

Key words: Pregnancy    Body mass index    Hypertension, pregnancy-induced    Body weight    Pregnancy outcome    Retrospective studies
收稿日期: 2019-04-04 出版日期: 2019-07-24
CLC:  R714.24  
通讯作者: 徐明娟     E-mail: huiting0823@126.com;13636373419@163.com
作者简介: 孙婷(1983-), 女, 硕士, 主治医师, 主要从事高危妊娠、妇产科常见病的诊治; E-mail:huiting0823@126.com; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4368-3361
服务  
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章  
孙婷
徐明娟

引用本文:

孙婷,徐明娟. 妊娠期正常高值血压产妇体质量及妊娠结局的回顾性分析[J]. 浙江大学学报(医学版), 2019, 48(2): 174-179.

SUN Ting,XU Mingjuan. Body weight and gestational outcomes in women with high normotension during pregnancy. J Zhejiang Univ (Med Sci), 2019, 48(2): 174-179.

链接本文:

http://www.zjujournals.com/med/CN/10.3785/j.issn.1008-9292.2019.04.08        http://www.zjujournals.com/med/CN/Y2019/V48/I2/174

[M(Q1, Q3)或n(%)]
组别 n 年龄(岁) 孕次 产次 文化程度
初中及以下 高中/中专/技校 大专 本科及以上
“—”无相关数据;P1:正常高值血压组与正常血压组比较;P2:正常高值血压组与HDP组比较;HDP:妊娠期高血压疾病.
正常高值血压组 500 28(26, 31) 2(1, 3) 1(1, 2) 29(5.80) 133(26.60) 164(32.80) 174(34.80)
正常血压组 500 29(26, 31) 2(1, 3) 1(1, 2) 48(9.60) 96(19.20) 162(32.40) 194(38.80)
HDP组 500 29(26, 32) 2(1, 3) 1(1, 2) 73(14.60) 129(25.80) 130(26.00) 168(33.60)
P1 >0.017 >0.017 <0.01 <0.01
P2 >0.017 >0.017 >0.017 >0.017
表 1  正常高值血压组、正常血压组、HDP组基线资料比较
[n(%)]
组别 n 孕前体质指数* 孕期体质量增加#
过轻 正常 超重 肥胖 过少 正常 过多
“—”无相关数据;P1:正常高值血压组与正常血压组比较;P2:正常高值血压组与HDP组比较;HDP:妊娠期高血压疾病.*过低、正常、超重、肥胖的定义分别为孕前体质指数<18.5 kg/m2、18.5~<24.0 kg/m2、24.0~<28.0 kg/m2、≥28.0 kg/m2#过少、正常、过多的定义分别为孕期体质量增加<8.5 kg、8.5~12.5 kg、>12.5 kg.
正常高值血压组 500 56(11.20) 363(72.60) 53(10.60) 28(5.60) 29(5.80) 65(13.00) 406(81.20)
正常血压组 500 77(15.40) 382(76.40) 27(5.40) 14(2.80) 17(3.40) 96(19.20) 387(77.40)
HDP组 500 39(7.80) 309(61.80) 89(17.80) 63(12.60) 38(7.60) 65(13.00) 397(79.40)
P1 <0.01 <0.01
P2 <0.01 >0.017
表 2  正常高值血压组、正常血压组、HDP组孕前体质指数、孕期体质量增加情况比较
[n(%)]
组别 n 羊水过少 胎盘早剥 剖宫产 产后出血 胎儿窘迫 早产 小于孕龄儿
“—”无相关数据;P1:正常高值血压组与正常血压组比较;P2:正常高值血压组与HDP组比较;HDP:妊娠期高血压疾病;*fisher精确概率法.
正常高值血压组 500 6(1.2) 1(0.2) 190(38.0) 4(0.8) 40(8.0) 10(2.0) 14(2.8)
正常血压组 500 4(0.8) 0(0.0) 156(31.2) 2(0.4) 33(6.6) 14(2.8) 8(1.6)
HDP组 500 21(4.2) 9(1.8) 331(66.2) 35(7.0) 58(11.6) 57(11.4) 74(14.8)
P1 >0.017 >0.017* >0.017 >0.017 >0.017 >0.017 >0.017
P2 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 >0.017 < 0.01 < 0.01
表 3  正常高值血压组、正常血压组、HDP组妊娠不良结局发生情况比较
[n(%)]
组别 n 孕前体质指数* 孕期体质量增加#
过低 正常 超重 肥胖 过少 正常 过多
“—”无相关数据.*过低、正常、超重、肥胖的定义分别为孕前体质指数<18.5 kg/m2、18.5~<24.0 kg/m2、24.0~<28.0 kg/m2、≥28.0 kg/m2#过少、正常、过多的定义分别为孕期体质量增加<8.5 kg、8.5~12.5 kg、>12.5 kg.
不良妊娠结局亚组 372 42(11.29) 264(70.97) 43(11.56) 23(6.18) 27(7.26) 39(10.48) 306(82.26)
无不良妊娠结局亚组 128 14(10.94) 99(77.34) 10(7.81) 5(3.91) 2(1.56) 26(20.31) 100(78.13)
P >0.017 <0.01
表 4  妊娠期正常高值血压组妊娠结局与孕前体质指数、孕期体质量增加的相关性分析结果
1 谢幸, 孔北华, 段涛 et al. 妇产科学[M]. 9版 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2018.
XIE Xing , KONG Beihua , DUAN Tao et al. Obstetrics and gynecology[M]. 9th ed Beijing: People's Medical Publishing House, 2018.
2 SAY L , CHOU D , GEMMILL A et al. Global causes of maternal death:a WHO systematic analysis[J]. Lancet Glob Health, 2014, 2 (6): e323- e333
doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(14)70227-X
3 ADANE A A , MISHRA G D , TOOTH L R . Adult pre-pregnancy weight change and risk of developing hypertensive disorders in pregnancy[J]. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol, 2017, 31 (3): 167- 175
doi: 10.1111/ppe.2017.31.issue-3
4 REN M , LI H , CAI W et al. Excessive gestational weight gain in accordance with the IOM criteria and the risk of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy:a meta-analysis[J]. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 2018, 18 (1): 281
doi: 10.1186/s12884-018-1922-y
5 WHELTON P K , CAREY R M , ARONOW W S et al. 2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA Guideline for the prevention, detection, evaluation, and management of high blood pressure in adults:executive summary:a report of the american college of cardiology/american heart association task force on clinical practice guidelines[J]. Hypertension, 2018, 71 (6): 1269- 1324
doi: 10.1161/HYP.0000000000000066
6 《中国高血压基层管理指南》修订委员会 . 中国高血压基层管理指南(2014年修订版)[J]. 中华高血压杂志, 2015, 23 (1): 24- 43
China committee for the revision of guidelines on primary management of hypertension . Chinese guidelines for primary management of hypertension(revised 2014 edition)[J]. Chinese Journal of Hypertension, 2015, 23 (1): 24- 43
7 中国肥胖问题工作组 . 中国成人超重和肥胖症预防控制指南[J]. 营养学报, 2004, 26 (1): 1- 4
China working group on obesity . Guidelines for Prevention and Control of Overweight and Obesity in Chinese Adults[J]. Acta Nutrimenta Sinica, 2004, 26 (1): 1- 4
8 MURAKAMI M , OHMICHI M , TAKAHASHI T et al. Prepregnancy body mass index as an important predictor of perinatal outcomes in Japanese[J]. Arch Gynecol Obstet, 2005, 271 (4): 311- 315
doi: 10.1007/s00404-004-0629-7
9 GUDNADóTTIR T A, BATEMAN B T, HERNáDEZ-DíAZ S, et al. Body mass index, smoking and hypertensive disorders during pregnancy: a population based case-control study[J/OL]. PLoS One, 2016, 11(3): e0152187.
10 MASHO S W , URBAN P , CHA S et al. Body mass index, weight gain, and hypertensive disorders in pregnancy[J]. Am J Hypertens, 2016, 29 (6): 763- 771
doi: 10.1093/ajh/hpv184
11 SISTI G . Maternal outcomes associated with lower range stage 1 hypertension[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2019, 133 (1): 190
12 KIONDO P , WAMUYU-MAINA G , BIMENYAG S et al. Risk factors for pre-eclampsia in Mulago Hospital, Kampala, Uganda[J]. Trop Med Int Health, 2012, 17 (4): 480- 487
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2011.02926.x
13 马清光, 李慧敏, 程晓 et al. 超重孕妇肥胖抑制素、炎症因子水平及相关性研究[J]. 现代检验医学杂志, 2018, 33 (6): 65- 68
MA Qingguang , LI Huimin , CHENG Xiao et al. Study on the correlation between obestatin and inflammatory factors in prepregnancy overweight women[J]. Journal of Modern Laboratory Medicine, 2018, 33 (6): 65- 68
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-7414.2018.06.017
14 王觅, 吴素慧, 高艺敏, 等.孕期体重管理与妊娠结局及产后体重滞留的关系[J/CD].中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2017, 11(20): 2327-2330.
WANG Mi, WU Suhui, GAO Yimin, et al. Relationship of management of gestational weight gain during pregnancy with pregnancy outcomes and postpartum weight retention[J/CD]. Chinese Journal of Clinicians(Electronic Edition), 2017, 11(20): 2327-2330. (in Chinese)
15 MACDONALD-WALLIS C , TILLING K , FRASER A et al. Gestational weight gain as a risk factor for hypertensive disorders of pregnancy[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2013, 209 (4): 327.e1- 17
doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.05.042
16 THANGARATINAM S , ROGOZINSKA E , JOLLY K et al. Effects of interventions in pregnancy on maternal weight and obstetric outcomes:meta-analysis of randomised evidence[J]. BMJ, 2012, 344:e2088
doi: 10.1136/bmj.e2088
[1] 钟晚思, 陈智才, 陈红芳, 徐冬娟, 王志敏, 胡海芳, 吴承龙, 张晓玲, 马小董, 王亚仙, 胡海涛, 楼敏, 浙江省缺血性脑卒中静脉溶栓的临床行为干预研究协作组 . 院前急救医疗服务对缺血性脑卒中患者静脉溶栓预后的影响[J]. 浙江大学学报(医学版), 2019, 48(3): 241-246.
[2] 陶安阳, 王志敏, 陈红芳, 徐冬娟, 胡海芳, 吴承龙, 张晓玲, 马小董, 王亚仙, 胡海涛, 楼敏, 浙江省缺血性脑卒中静脉溶栓的临床行为干预研究协作组 . 合并心房颤动对缺血性脑卒中患者静脉溶栓后颅内出血转化的影响[J]. 浙江大学学报(医学版), 2019, 48(3): 254-259.
[3] 泮飞虎, 楼敏, 陈智才, 陈红芳, 徐冬娟, 王志敏, 胡海芳, 吴承龙, 张晓玲, 马小董, 王亚仙, 胡海涛, 浙江省缺血性脑卒中静脉溶栓的临床行为干预研究协作组 . 不同工作时间段就诊对缺血性脑卒中患者静脉溶栓预后的影响[J]. 浙江大学学报(医学版), 2019, 48(3): 267-274.
[4] 付涧兰,宋法寰,程爱萍. 脂肪肉瘤的18F-氟代脱氧葡萄糖PET-CT显像特征[J]. 浙江大学学报(医学版), 2019, 48(2): 193-199.
[5] 虞雅,魏凯,姚秋萍,田申,梁昆,周黎明,王丽萍,金敏. 子宫内膜异位症合并不孕患者的体外受精促排卵治疗:拮抗剂可代替激动剂吗?[J]. 浙江大学学报(医学版), 2019, 48(2): 165-173.
[6] 吕朵,谢锡绍,张晓辉,陈江华. 腹膜透析患者平均动脉压水平与死亡的关系[J]. 浙江大学学报(医学版), 2019, 48(2): 180-185.
[7] 沈盈,孙逸,顾伟忠,俞惠民,袁天明. 宫内感染对新生大鼠早期生长及神经行为发育的影响[J]. 浙江大学学报(医学版), 2019, 48(1): 58-64.
[8] 沈宏,季峰. 无X射线监视内镜下消化道支架置入治疗消化道狭窄的疗效和安全性[J]. 浙江大学学报(医学版), 2018, 47(6): 643-650.
[9] 卢凯平,卢惟钦,杨光唯,来集富,吴昊,蒋劲松. 一体式覆膜支架治疗分叉部狭窄腹主动脉瘤患者疗效分析[J]. 浙江大学学报(医学版), 2018, 47(6): 612-616.
[10] 楼叶琳,周一敏,鲁红,吕卫国. 宫颈锥切术后孕妇早产预测模型的建立[J]. 浙江大学学报(医学版), 2018, 47(4): 351-356.
[11] 裴磊 等. 磁共振平扫T1加权像脑内核团高信号与钆对比剂注射次数的相关性[J]. 浙江大学学报(医学版), 2017, 46(5): 487-491.
[12] 李爱静 等. 动态增强磁共振成像参照物模型定量参数与乳腺癌预后因素及分子病理分型的关系[J]. 浙江大学学报(医学版), 2017, 46(5): 505-510.
[13] 张格尔 等. 20例剖宫产术后瘢痕部位妊娠滋养细胞疾病回顾性分析[J]. 浙江大学学报(医学版), 2017, 46(5): 529-536.
[14] 刘春媚 等. 超声检查对黄色肉芽肿性胆囊炎的诊断价值[J]. 浙江大学学报(医学版), 2017, 46(5): 552-556.
[15] 陈益明 等. 中孕期母血清甲胎蛋白和游离β-hCG筛查胎儿腹裂和脐膨出的效率[J]. 浙江大学学报(医学版), 2017, 46(3): 268-273.