Please wait a minute...
浙江大学学报（医学版）
浙江大学学报（医学版）  2017, Vol. 46 Issue (5): 529-536    DOI: 10.3785/j.issn.1008-9292.2017.10.13
原著     
20例剖宫产术后瘢痕部位妊娠滋养细胞疾病回顾性分析
张格尔, 潘子旻
浙江大学医学院附属妇产科医院妇产科, 浙江 杭州 310006
Gestational trophoblastic diseases in cesarean scar: an analysis of 20 cases
ZHANG Ge'er, PAN Zimin
Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Women's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310006, China
 全文: PDF(1029 KB)  
摘要：

目的：探讨剖宫产术后瘢痕部位妊娠滋养细胞疾病的临床特点、诊断以及治疗方法。方法：收集浙江大学医学院附属妇产科医院2011年12月至2016年12月收治的3例剖宫产术后瘢痕部位妊娠滋养细胞疾病患者的临床资料。同时，检索万方数据、维普资讯中文期刊服务平台、中国知网、PubMed、ISI Web of Knowledge和荷兰《医学文摘》，筛选出剖宫产术后瘢痕部位妊娠滋养细胞疾病病例，并进行回顾性分析。结果：共有20例患者纳入分析。临床主要表现为停经或人工流产后异常阴道出血，可伴有腹痛；19例患者伴有血β人绒毛膜促性腺激素（β-hCG）异常增高。典型超声表现主要有子宫体积异常增大，宫腔内见蜂窝样异常回声（或描述为多个囊性暗区、多个无回声区及多个液性暗区）或不均质回声团块，可与肌层分界不清，病灶内或周边血流信号丰富；部分超声检查同时提示病灶位于前峡部或累及剖宫产术后瘢痕部位。初步诊断提示为剖宫产术后瘢痕部位病灶的12例患者中，9例接受了子宫动脉栓塞术（UAE）预处理，仅1例未行UAE的患者出血量大于1500 mL，均未发生因大出血而切除子宫的情况；而初步诊断未提示剖宫产术后瘢痕部位病灶的8例患者中，其中1例接受了UAE预处理，3例因出血量大于1500 mL而切除子宫。除2例患者未提供随访信息或失访，18例患者随访至今均无死亡病例。其中15例患者血β-hCG降至正常，2例血β-hCG下降理想，1例血β-hCG阴性，随访期间所有患者均未复发。结论：剖宫产术后瘢痕部位妊娠滋养细胞疾病出血风险高，误诊、漏诊率高，初步诊断是否发现病灶累及剖宫产术后瘢痕部位可间接影响总出血量和子宫切除的风险，而UAE是减少出血量和降低子宫切除率的有效手段。
关键词： 瘢痕;  导管插入术;  子宫;  剖宫产术/副作用;  绒毛膜促性腺激素;  妊娠滋养细胞肿瘤;  动脉;  外周    
Abstract:

Objective: To analyze the clinical features, diagnosis and treatment of gestational trophoblastic diseases in cesarean scar.Methods: Clinical data of three cases of gestational trophoblastic diseases in cesarean scar diagnosed in Women's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine during December 2011 and December 2016 were collected. And literature search was performed in Wanfang data, VIP, CNKI, PubMed, ISI Web of Knowledge and EMbase database.Results: A total of 20 cases of gestational trophoblastic diseases were included in the analysis. Clinical features were mainly abnormal vaginal bleeding after menopause, artificial abortion or medical abortion, which might be accompanied by abdominal pain. Serum β-human chorionic gonadotropin (β-hCG) levels were increased in 19 patients. The sonographic features were increase of uterine volume, honeycomb-like abnormal intrauterine echo (or described as multiple cystic dark area, multiple anechoic area and multiple liquid dark area) or heterogeneity echo conglomeration, and no clear bound with muscular layer in some cases. There were abundant blood flow signals inside or around the lesions. The ultrasonography indicated that the lesions were located in the anterior side of the uterine isthmus with the involvement of cesarean section scar. In 12 cases with lesions in cesarean scar shown by preliminary diagnosis, 9 underwent uterine artery embolization (UAE) for pretreatment; the blood loss greater than 1500 mL was observed in only one case without UAE; no patient received hysterectomy. In 8 patients whose lesions were not shown in cesarean scar, only one case received UAE pretreatment, and hysterectomy was performed in 3 cases due to blood loss greater than 1500 mL. Two cases were lost in follow-up and no death was reported in remaining 18 cases. The serum β-hCG levels returned to normal or satisfactory level during the follow-up in 17 cases with increased β-hCG levels before treatment and no recurrence was observed. Conclusions: The misdiagnosis rate and missed diagnosis rate of gestational trophoblastic diseases in cesarean section scar are high. The identification of cesarean section scar involvement and UAE may reduce the bleeding and avoid hysterectomy.
Key words: Gestational trophoblastic neoplasms    Uterus    Arteries    Chorionic gonadotropin    Catheterization,peripheral    Cicatrix    Cesarean section/adverse effects
收稿日期: 2017-02-28 出版日期: 2017-10-25
CLC:  R737.3  
通讯作者: 潘子旻(1976-),女,硕士,副主任医师,主要从事妇科肿瘤、宫颈疾病的临床和基础研究;E-mail:panzimin@163.com,http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7976-6575     E-mail: panzimin@163.com
作者简介: 张格尔(1987-),男,硕士,住院医师,主要从事肿瘤免疫、妊娠滋养细胞疾病的临床和基础研究;E-mail:zhanggeer@hotmail.com;http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3793-2306
服务　　
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章　　

引用本文:

张格尔 等. 20例剖宫产术后瘢痕部位妊娠滋养细胞疾病回顾性分析[J]. 浙江大学学报（医学版）, 2017, 46(5): 529-536.

ZHANG Ge'er, PAN Zimin. Gestational trophoblastic diseases in cesarean scar: an analysis of 20 cases. Journal of ZheJiang University(Medical Science), 2017, 46(5): 529-536.

链接本文:

http://www.zjujournals.com/xueshu/med/CN/10.3785/j.issn.1008-9292.2017.10.13    或    http://www.zjujournals.com/xueshu/med/CN/Y2017/V46/I5/529

[1] 冯凤芝,向阳.妊娠滋养细胞疾病的规范化治疗[J].中国癌症防治杂志,2012,4(1):19-22. FENG Fengzhi,XIANG Yang. Standardized treatment of getational trophoblastic disease[J]. Chinese Journal of Oncology Prevention and Treatment,2012,4(1):19-22. (in Chinese)
[2] KO J K, WAN H L, NGU S F, et al. Cesarean scar molar pregnancy[J]. Obstet Gynecol,2012,119(2 Pt 2):449-451.
[3] JURKOVIC D, HILLABY K, WOELFER B, et al. First-trimester diagnosis and management of pregnancies implanted into the lower uterine segment cesarean section scar[J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol,2003,21(3):220-227.
[4] SEOW K M, HUANG L W, LIN Y H, et al. Cesarean scar pregnancy:issues in management[J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol,2004,23(3):247-253.
[5] 石一复,李娟清,郑伟,等.360余万次妊娠中妊娠滋养细胞疾病发生情况调查[J].中华妇产科杂志,2005,40(2):76-78. SHI Yifu, LI Juanqing, ZHENG Wei, et al. Survey of gestational trophoblastic disease incidence among 3.6 million pregnancies in China[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology,2005,40(2):76-78. (in Chinese)
[6] WU C F, HSU C Y, CHEN C P. Ectopic molar pregnancy in a cesarean scar[J]. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol,2006,45(4):343-345.
[7] 刘勇鸿,路虹.剖宫产瘢痕处不完全性葡萄胎误诊1例分析[J].中国误诊学杂志,2012:12(11):2643. LIU Yonghong, LU Hong. A case analysis of misdiagnosis of partial hydatidiform mole on cesarean scar[J]. Chinese Journal of Misdiagnostics,2012,12(11):2643. (in Chinese)
[8] 李文仙.剖宫产术后子宫疤痕处葡萄胎1例[J].中国医学创新,2008,5(36):173-174. LI Wenxian. A case of hydatidiform mole on uterine scar after cesarean delivery[J]. Medical Innovation of China,2008,5(36):173-174. (in Chinese)
[9] 张海燕.瘢痕处葡萄胎妊娠致妊娠早期子宫破裂1例[J].实用医学杂志,2011,27(24):4491. ZHANG Haiyan. A case of hysterorrhexis during early pregnancy result by hydatidiform mole on cesarean scar[J]. The Journal of Practical Medicine,2011,27(24):4491. (in Chinese)
[10] 王猛,丁晓萍,侯庆香.部分性葡萄胎合并剖宫产子宫瘢痕部位妊娠1例[J].实用医学杂志,2011,27(5):929. WANG Meng, DING Xiaoping, HOU Qingxiang. A case of partial hydatidiform mole complicated with caesarean scar pregnancy[J]. The Journal of Practical Medicine,2011,27(5):929. (in Chinese)
[11] QIAN Z D, ZHU X M. Caesarean scar choriocarcinoma:a case report and review of the literature[J]. Eur J Med Res,2014,19:25.
[12] 陈素云.子宫切口处葡萄胎疑难病例报告1例[J].中国社区医师,2012,14(11):257. CHEN Suyun. A intractable case report of hydatidiform mole on cesarean scar[J]. Chinese Community Doctors,2012,14(11):257. (in Chinese)
[13] SORBI F, SISTI G, PIERALLI A, et al. Cervicoisthmic choriocarcinoma mimicking cesarean section scar ectopic pregnancy[J]. J Res Med Sci,2013,18(10):914-917.
[14] 马金赫,徐爱丽,孙海珠,等.剖宫产瘢痕部位绒毛膜癌1例[J].实用妇产科杂志,2015,31(11):878-879. MA Jinhe, XU Aili, SUN Haizhu, et al. A case of choriocarcinoma on cesarean scar[J]. Journal of Practical Obstetrics and Gynecology,2015,31(11):878-879. (in Chinese)
[15] 李旋,陈明.子宫切口葡萄胎妊娠1例[J].第三军医大学学报,2013,35(10):1008. LI Xuan,CHEN Ming. A case of hydatidiform mole on cesarean scar[J]. Acta Academiae Medicinae Militaris Tertiae,2013,35(10):1008. (in Chinese)
[16] CHEN B J, CHENG C J, CHEN W Y. Transformation of a post-cesarean section placental site nodule into a coexisting epithelioid trophoblastic tumor and placental site trophoblastic tumor:a case report[J]. Diagn Pathol,2013,8(1):85.
[17] 石丽萍,许学岚,曾秀华,等.子宫瘢痕处葡萄胎1例[J].中国计划生育和妇产科,2015,7(9):73-74,78. SHI Liping, XU Xuelan, ZENG Xiuhua, et al. A case of hydatidiform mole on cesarean scar[J]. Chinese Journal of Family Planning & Gynecotokology,2015,7(9):73-74,78. (in Chinese)
[18] 李霞,岳红萍,胡红文,等.剖宫产疤痕部位葡萄胎1例报告[J].健康前沿,2016,23(5):175. LI Xia, YUE Hongping, HU Hongwen, et al, A case report of hydatidiform mole on cesarean scar[J]. Health Frontier,2016,23(5):175. (in Chinese)
[19] 雷蔓莉,殷质朴,丁丽琴,等.剖宫产瘢痕侵蚀性葡萄胎大出血致子宫切除的教训1例并文献复习[J].实用妇科内分泌杂志,2015,2(12):197-198. LEI Manli,YIN Zhipu,DING Liqin,et al. One lesson case of hysterectomy due to massive bleeding of invasive hydatidiform mole on cesarean scar and literature review[J]. Journal of Practical Gynecologic Endocrinology,2015,2(12):197-198. (in Chinese)
[20] 张彦玲,李合欣,范林霄,等.误诊为剖宫产瘢痕妊娠的滋养叶细胞肿瘤一例[J].山西医药杂志,2015,44(24):2982-2983. ZHANG Yanling, LI Hexin, FAN linxiao, et al. A case of getational trophoblastic neoplasm misdiagnosed as caesarean scar pregnancy[J]. Shanxi Medical Journal,2015,44(24):2982-2983. (in Chinese)
[21] SHERER D M, DALLOUL M, CHO Y, et al. Spontaneous first-trimester perforation of the uterus following cesarean scar pregnancy choriocarcinoma[J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol,2016,47(4):519-521.
[22] ALTIERI A, FRANCESCHI S, FERLAY J, et al. Epidemiology and aetiology of gestational trophoblastic diseases[J]. Lancet Oncol,2003,4(11):670-678.
[23] 侯磊,李光辉,邹丽颖,等.全国剖宫产率及剖宫产指征构成比调查的多中心研究[J].中华妇产科杂志,2014,49(10):728-735. HOU Lei, LI Guanghui, ZOU Liyin, et al. Cesarean delivery rate and indications in mainland China:a cross sectional study in 2011[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology,2014,49(10):728-735. (in Chinese)
[24] MBARKI C, JERBI E, HSAYAOUI N, et al. Molar tubal ectopic pregnancy:report of two cases[J]. J Obstet Gynaecol Res,2015,41(6):985-988.
[25] LOUKOVAARA M, PUKKALA E, LEHTOVIRTA P, et al. Epidemiology of hydatidiform mole in Finland, 1975 to 2001[J]. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol,2005,26(2):207-208.
[26] GARNER E I, GOLDSTEIN D P, FELTMATE C M, et al. Gestational trophoblastic disease[J]. Clin Obstet Gynecol,2007,50(1):112-122.
[27] ASH A, SMITH A, MAXWELL D. Caesarean scar pregnancy[J]. BJOG,2007,114(3):253-263.
[28] TAN G, CHONG Y S, BISWAS A. Caesarean scar pregnancy:a diagnosis to consider carefully in patients with risk factors[J]. Ann Acad Med Singapore,2005,34(2):216-219.
[29] WANG Y L, SU T H, CHEN H S. Operative laparoscopy for unruptured ectopic pregnancy in a caesarean scar[J]. BJOG,2006,113(9):1035-1038.
[30] 鲁红.妊娠滋养细胞疾病超声诊断[J].中国实用妇科与产科杂志,2011,27(9):656-658. LU Hong. Ultrasonic diagnosis of gestational trophoblastic disease[J]. Chinese Journal of Practical Gynecology and Obstetrics,2011,27(9):656-658. (in Chinese)
[31] MALEK M, MORADI B, MOUSAVI A S, et al. Complementary role of ultrasound in management of gestational trophoblastic disease[J]. Iran J Radiol,2015,12(2):e13955.
[1] 王苏波 等. 动态对比增强磁共振药代动力学模型在鉴别富细胞型子宫平滑肌瘤中的应用[J]. 浙江大学学报（医学版）, 2017, 46(5): 498-504.
[2] 任晓梅 等. 低盐饮食对犬类心脏组织基因表达的影响[J]. 浙江大学学报（医学版）, 2017, 46(4): 433-438.
[3] 赖针珍 等. 动态CT血管造影评估急性基底动脉闭塞患者侧支血流与再灌注治疗预后的关系[J]. 浙江大学学报（医学版）, 2017, 46(4): 371-376.
[4] 冯学问 等. 急性缺血性卒中患者血管内治疗后应用替罗非班的安全性及预后分析[J]. 浙江大学学报（医学版）, 2017, 46(4): 397-404.
[5] 陈益明 等. 中孕期母血清甲胎蛋白和游离β-hCG筛查胎儿腹裂和脐膨出的效率[J]. 浙江大学学报（医学版）, 2017, 46(3): 268-273.
[6] 张晓群 等. 不同药物洗脱支架对冠状动脉小血管病变患者预后影响的meta分析[J]. 浙江大学学报（医学版）, 2017, 46(3): 305-314.
[7] 王晏鹏,黄琼晓,徐盛,舒静. 采用吸宫和电凝方法建立小鼠子宫内膜损伤模型的比较[J]. 浙江大学学报（医学版）, 2017, 46(2): 186-191.
[8] 王晏鹏 等. 采用吸宫和电凝方法建立小鼠子宫内膜损伤模型的比较[J]. 浙江大学学报（医学版）, 2017, 46(2): 186-191.
[9] 陈刚,张鼎,应亚草,王志峰,陶伟,朱皓,张景峰,彭志毅. 国产载药微球经动脉化疗栓塞治疗不可切除原发性肝癌的临床研究[J]. 浙江大学学报（医学版）, 2017, 46(1): 44-51.
[10] 叶彬娴 等. 慢性肾脏病患者主动脉僵硬度相关指数变化及影响因素分析[J]. 浙江大学学报（医学版）, 2016, 45(5): 508-514.
[11] 严凌 等. 阿托伐他汀可改善急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后无复流现象[J]. 浙江大学学报（医学版）, 2016, 45(5): 530-535.
[12] 欧昌江 等. 采用微血管减压治疗椎动脉夹层动脉瘤致面肌痉挛一例[J]. 浙江大学学报（医学版）, 2016, 45(5): 536-539.
[13] 林先刚 等. 姜黄素对慢性阻塞性肺疾病大鼠肺动脉平滑肌细胞的作用及其机制研究[J]. 浙江大学学报（医学版）, 2016, 45(5): 469-476.
[14] 杜苗苗 等. 钙化性主动脉瓣疾病药物治疗研究进展[J]. 浙江大学学报（医学版）, 2016, 45(4): 432-438.
[15] 竺天虹 等. 上皮间充质转化介导子宫内膜异位症发生发展的研究进展[J]. 浙江大学学报（医学版）, 2016, 45(4): 439-445.