Please wait a minute...
浙江大学学报(医学版)  2017, Vol. 46 Issue (4): 371-376    DOI: 10.3785/j.issn.1008-9292.2017.08.05
缺血性卒中专题     
动态CT血管造影评估急性基底动脉闭塞患者侧支血流与再灌注治疗预后的关系
赖针珍1,2, 张圣1, 钟根龙1, 张晓程1, 陈清梦1, 楼敏1
1. 浙江大学医学院附属第二医院神经内科, 浙江 杭州 310009;
2. 浙江省天台县人民医院神经内科, 浙江 天台 317200
Relationship between dynamic CT angiography-based collateral flow evaluation and outcome of patients with stroke induced by acute basilar artery occlusion
LAI Zhenzhen1,2, ZHANG Sheng1, ZHONG Genlong1, ZHANG Xiaocheng1, CHEN Qingmeng1, LOU Min1
1. Department of Neurology, the Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310009, China;
2. Department of Neurology, Tiantai People's Hospital of Zhejiang Province, Tiantai 317200, China
 全文: PDF(1218 KB)  
摘要:

目的:研究动态CT血管造影对急性基底动脉闭塞所致缺血性卒中患者侧支血流状态评估以及预测再灌注治疗后结局的价值。方法:回顾性分析2012年1月至2016年8月在浙江大学医学院附属第二医院接受再灌注治疗的45例急性基底动脉闭塞所致缺血性卒中患者的临床资料。采用单因素和二元logistic回归模型分析患者预后的独立预测因素,并采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线确定预测患者预后的后循环侧支评分(PC-CS)的最佳阈值。结果:二元logistic回归分析提示,基线美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表(NIHSS)评分(OR=0.886,95%CI:0.802~0.979,P<0.05)和PC-CS(OR=1.962,95%CI:1.026~3.752,P<0.05)是患者预后的独立预测因素,且PC-CS 4.5分是预测患者预后的最佳阈值(AUC=0.837,敏感度为68.2%,特异度为87.0%)。结论:基于CT灌注成像重建的动态CT血管造影可用于评估后循环侧支血流状态,并能预测急性基底动脉闭塞所致缺血性卒中患者再灌注治疗后的临床结局。

关键词: 基底动脉侧支循环再灌注动脉闭塞性疾病/药物疗法卒中/药物疗法血流动力学血管造影术数字减影体层摄影术X线计算机/方法血栓溶解疗法/方法预后    
Abstract:

Objective:To evaluate the collateral flow in patients with ischemic stroke due to acute basilar artery occlusion by dynamic CT angiography and to predict the outcome after reperfusion therapy. Methods:Forty-five patients with stroke due to acute basilar artery occlusion undergoing reperfusion treatment in the Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine during January 2012 and August 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. Univariate and binary logistic regression model were used to identify the independent predictors of patient's outcome, and the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to determine the optimal threshold of the posterior circulation collateral score (PC-CS) in predicting the prognosis of the patients. Results:Binary logistic regression analysis indicated that the baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score (OR=0.886, 95% CI:0.802-0.979, P<0.05) and PC-CS (OR=1.962, 95%CI:1.026-3.752, P<0.05) were independent predictors of patient's outcome, and PC-CS 4.5 was the optimal threshold (AUC:0.837, sensitivity of 68.2%, specificity of 87.0%). Conclusion:Dynamic CT angiography based on CT perfusion imaging can be used to evaluate collaterals in posterior circulation, and to predict clinical outcome after reperfusion therapy in patients with acute basilar artery occlusion.

Key words: Basilar artery    Collateral circulation    Reperfusion    Arterial occlusive diseases/drug therapy    Stroke/drug therapy    Hemodynamics    Angiography, digital subtraction    Tomography, X-ray computed/methods    Thrombolytic therapy/methods    Prognosis
收稿日期: 2017-02-10 出版日期: 2017-08-25
CLC:  R743.3  
基金资助:

国家自然科学基金(81471170,81622017)

通讯作者: 楼敏(1976-),女,博士,主任医师,教授,博士生导师,主要从事神经病学研究;E-mail:lm99@zju.edu.cn;http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6627-064X     E-mail: lm99@zju.edu.cn
作者简介: 赖针珍(1984-),女,硕士研究生,主治医师,主要从事神经病学研究;E-mail:24909698@qq.com;http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5080-6107
服务  
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章  

引用本文:

赖针珍 等. 动态CT血管造影评估急性基底动脉闭塞患者侧支血流与再灌注治疗预后的关系[J]. 浙江大学学报(医学版), 2017, 46(4): 371-376.

LAI Zhenzhen, ZHANG Sheng, ZHONG Genlong, ZHANG Xiaocheng, CHEN Qingmeng, LOU Min. Relationship between dynamic CT angiography-based collateral flow evaluation and outcome of patients with stroke induced by acute basilar artery occlusion. Journal of ZheJiang University(Medical Science), 2017, 46(4): 371-376.

链接本文:

http://www.zjujournals.com/xueshu/med/CN/10.3785/j.issn.1008-9292.2017.08.05        http://www.zjujournals.com/xueshu/med/CN/Y2017/V46/I4/371

[1] MATTLE H P, ARNOLD M, LINDSBERG P J, et al. Basilar artery occlusion[J]. Lancet Neurol,2011,10(11):1002-1014.
[2] LINDSBERG P J, SAIRANEN T, STRBIAN D, et al. Current treatment of basilar artery occlusion[J]. Ann N Y Acad Sci,2012,1268:35-44.
[3] YEUNG J T, MATOUK C C, BULSARA K R, et al. Endovascular revascularization for basilar artery occlusion[J]. Interv Neurol,2015,3(1):31-40.
[4] KUMAR G, SHAHRIPOUR R B, ALEXANDROV A V. Recanalization of acute basilar artery occlusion improves outcomes:a meta-analysis[J]. J Neurointerv Surg,2015,7(12):868-874.
[5] BANG O Y, SAVER J L, KIM S J, et al. Collateral flow predicts response to endovascular therapy for acute ischemic stroke[J]. Stroke,2011,42(3):693-699.
[6] QURESHI A I. Editorial-a new method to classify the collateral patterns in the posterior circulation[J]. J Vasc Interv Neurol,2012,5(1):1-2.
[7] VAN DER HOEVEN E J, MCVERRY F, VOS J A, et al. Collateral flow predicts outcome after basilar artery occlusion:The posterior circulation collateral score[J]. Int J Stroke,2016,11(7):768-775.
[8] SHETH S A, LIEBESKIND D S. Imaging evaluation of collaterals in the brain:physiology and clinical translation[J]. Curr Radiol Rep,2014,2(1):29.
[9] LYDEN P, LU M, JACKSON C, et al. Underlying structure of the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale:results of a factor analysis. NINDS tPA Stroke Trial Investigators[J]. Stroke,1999,30(11):2347-2354.
[10] CAMPBELL B C, MITCHELL P J, KLEINIG T J, et al. Endovascular therapy for ischemic stroke with perfusion-imaging selection[J]. N Engl J Med,2015,372(11):1009-1018.
[11] ARCHER C R, HORENSTEIN S. Basilar artery occlusion:clinical and radiological correlation[J]. Stroke,1977,8(3):383-390.
[12] ZAIDAT O O, YOO A J, KHATRI P, et al. Recommendations on angiographic revascularization grading standards for acute ischemic stroke:a consensus statement[J]. Stroke,2013,44(9):2650-2663.
[13] LARRUE V, VON K R R, MVLLER A, et al. Risk factors for severe hemorrhagic transformation in ischemic stroke patients treated with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator:a secondary analysis of the European-Australasian Acute Stroke Study (ECASS Ⅱ)[J]. Stroke,2001,32(2):438-441.
[14] SCHONEWILLE W J, WIJMAN C A, MICHEL P, et al. Treatment and outcomes of acute basilar artery occlusion in the Basilar Artery International Cooperation Study (BASICS):a prospective registry study[J]. Lancet Neurol, 2009, 8(8):724-730.
[15] LINDSBERG P J, PEKKOLA J, STRBIAN D, et al. Time window for recanalization in basilar artery occlusion:speculative synthesis[J]. Neurology,2015,85(20):1806-1815.
[16] GOYAL N, TSIVGOULIS G, NICKELE C, et al. Posterior circulation CT angiography collaterals predict outcome of endovascular acute ischemic stroke therapy for basilar artery occlusion[J]. J Neurointerv Surg,2016,8(8):783-786.
[17] VAN HOUWELINGEN R C, LUIJCKX G J, MAZURI A, et al. Safety and outcome of intra-arterial treatment for basilar artery occlusion[J]. JAMA Neurol,2016,73(10):1225-1230.
[18] MITEFF F, LEVI C R, BATEMAN G A, et al. The independent predictive utility of computed tomography angiographic collateral status in acute ischaemic stroke[J]. Brain,2009,132(Pt 8):2231-2238.

[1] 潘静颖 等. PET-CT与乳腺癌分子病理分型、治疗反应及预后的相关性研究进展[J]. 浙江大学学报(医学版), 2017, 46(5): 473-480.
[2] 傅立平 等. PET-CT诊断ⅠA2~ⅡA期宫颈癌原发灶和盆腔淋巴结转移的价值[J]. 浙江大学学报(医学版), 2017, 46(5): 517-522.
[3] 叶红柔 等. 双气囊小肠镜和多层螺旋CT对小肠肿瘤的诊断价值[J]. 浙江大学学报(医学版), 2017, 46(5): 557-562.
[4] 张思影 等. CT和磁共振参数反应图在肿瘤精准疗效评估中的研究进展[J]. 浙江大学学报(医学版), 2017, 46(5): 468-472.
[5] 潘瑶 等. 胰腺癌的影像学精准诊断与评估[J]. 浙江大学学报(医学版), 2017, 46(5): 462-467.
[6] 李爱静 等. 动态增强磁共振成像参照物模型定量参数与乳腺癌预后因素及分子病理分型的关系[J]. 浙江大学学报(医学版), 2017, 46(5): 505-510.
[7] 胡静 等. 记忆T细胞在行放射治疗的非小细胞肺癌患者中的表达及其预后预测价值[J]. 浙江大学学报(医学版), 2017, 46(5): 523-528.
[8] 卞巍 等. CT在诊断卵巢转移性肿瘤病理类型和转移灶来源中的应用价值[J]. 浙江大学学报(医学版), 2017, 46(5): 546-551.
[9] 王苏波 等. 动态对比增强磁共振药代动力学模型在鉴别富细胞型子宫平滑肌瘤中的应用[J]. 浙江大学学报(医学版), 2017, 46(5): 498-504.
[10] 邝平定 等. 双能量CT对非小细胞肺癌淋巴结转移的诊断价值[J]. 浙江大学学报(医学版), 2017, 46(5): 511-516.
[11] 张美霞 等. 静脉溶栓获益的最大梗死体积阈值与急性缺血性卒中患者发病时间的关系[J]. 浙江大学学报(医学版), 2017, 46(4): 384-389.
[12] 王庆松 等. 基于CT灌注成像的侧支评分预测急性前循环大血管闭塞患者动脉取栓治疗预后的价值[J]. 浙江大学学报(医学版), 2017, 46(4): 377-383.
[13] 方兵 等. 舌下神经管区硬脑膜动静脉瘘介入治疗二例[J]. 浙江大学学报(医学版), 2017, 46(4): 445-448.
[14] 冯学问 等. 急性缺血性卒中患者血管内治疗后应用替罗非班的安全性及预后分析[J]. 浙江大学学报(医学版), 2017, 46(4): 397-404.
[15] 张晓群 等. 不同药物洗脱支架对冠状动脉小血管病变患者预后影响的meta分析[J]. 浙江大学学报(医学版), 2017, 46(3): 305-314.