Please wait a minute...
浙江大学学报(医学版)  2016, Vol. 45 Issue (6): 641-647    DOI: 10.3785/j.issn.1008-9292.2016.11.14
meta分析     
手术和非手术治疗老年人肱骨近端三、四部分骨折疗效的meta分析
李文波1, 丁高恒2, 刘军1, 石杰1, 张超1, 高秋明1
1. 兰州军区兰州总医院全军骨科中心创伤骨科, 甘肃 兰州 730050;
2. 甘肃中医药大学公共卫生学院, 甘肃 兰州 730000
Operative versus non-operative treatment for three- or four-part proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
LI Wenbo1, DING Gaoheng2, LIU Jun1, SHI Jie1, ZHANG Chao1, GAO Qiuming1
1. Orthopaedic Trauma of Orthopaedics Center, Lanzhou General Hospital of PLA, Lanzhou 730050, China;
2. School of Public Health, Gansu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou 730000, China
 全文: PDF(1131 KB)  
摘要:

目的:采用meta分析方法评价手术和非手术治疗老年人肱骨近端三、四部分骨折的临床疗效。方法:计算机检索Cochrane Library、Medline、Embase、中国生物医学文献数据库、中国知网、万方数据和维普数据库中关于手术和非手术治疗老年人肱骨近端三、四部分骨折疗效的文献,并手动检索重要骨科学会会议摘要。对纳入的文献进行方法学质量评价,并以肩关节功能Constant评分、远期疼痛、股骨头缺血性坏死(AVN)发生率、再手术率、骨关节炎发生率、骨不连发生率作为评价指标,采用RevMan 5.3软件进行meta分析。结果:最终纳入6篇文献,共264例患者。meta分析结果显示,手术治疗后患者与非手术治疗后患者肩关节功能Constant评分(MD=0.47,95%CI:-4.35~5.28,P=0.85)、AVN发生率(OR=0.56,95%CI:0.25~1.24,P=0.15)、骨关节炎发生率(OR=0.56,95%CI:0.19~1.68,P=0.30)、骨不连发生率(OR=0.43,95%CI:0.13~1.43,P=0.17)差异无统计学意义,远期疼痛评分手术治疗组优于非手术治疗组(MD=1.01,95%CI:0.12~1.19,P=0.03),再手术率手术治疗组高于非手术治疗组(OR=3.97,95%CI:1.45~10.92,P=0.007)。结论:现有文献表明,老年人肱骨近端三、四部分骨折手术治疗与非手术治疗在患者肩关节功能Constant评分、AVN发生率、骨关节炎发生率、骨不连发生率方面无差异,但需大规模、高质量的研究进一步证实。

关键词: Meta分析肩骨折/外科学手法,骨科老年人骨折固定治疗结果    
Abstract:

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of operative and non-operative treatment for three- or four-part proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients by meta-analysis. Methods: The literature search was performed in Cochrance Library, Medline, Embase, SinoMed, CNKI, Wanfang data and CQVIP databases for operative and non-operative treatment of three- or four-part proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients, and searches of conference proceedings were also conducted. The data were extracted and a meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3. The outcome measures included Constants score, pain and incidence rates of AVN, reoperation, osteoarthritis, nonunion. Results: Six randomized controlled trials involving 264 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The differences of Constant scores (MD=0.47, 95% CI:-4.35-5.28, P=0.85), incidence of ANV (OR=0.56, 95% CI:0.25-1.24, P=0.15), incidence of osteoarthritis (OR=0.56, 95% CI:0.19-1.68, P=0.30), incidence of nonunion (OR=0.43, 95% CI:0.13-1.43, P=0.17) between operative group and non-operative group were not statistically significant. Operative treatment was better in pain score (MD=1.01, 95% CI:0.12-1.19, P=0.03) and had statistically significant higher reoperative rate (OR=3.97, 95% CI:1.45-10.92, P=0.007). Conclusions: No evidence support that there is difference in Constant score and incidence rate of ANV, osteoarthritis, nonunion between operative and non-operative treatment for three- or four-part proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients. More high quality randomized controlled trials are required to determine which treatment is more efficient.

Key words: Meta-analysis    Shoulder fractures/surgery    Manipulation, orthopedic    Aged    Fracture fixation    Treatment outcome
收稿日期: 2016-08-08
CLC:  R683  
基金资助:

甘肃省自然科学基金(1506RJZA298);甘肃省青年科技基金(1606RJYA300)

通讯作者: 高秋明(1970-),男,硕士,副主任医师,硕士生导师,主要从事创伤骨科及显微外科研究;E-mail:gaoqm001@sohu.com;http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2403-1082     E-mail: gaoqm001@sohu.com
作者简介: 李文波(1992-),男,硕士研究生,主要从事创伤骨病和骨髓炎诊治研究;E-mail:dliwenb@163.com;http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1812-9457
服务  
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章  

引用本文:

李文波 等. 手术和非手术治疗老年人肱骨近端三、四部分骨折疗效的meta分析[J]. 浙江大学学报(医学版), 2016, 45(6): 641-647.

LI Wenbo, DING Gaoheng, LIU Jun, SHI Jie, ZHANG Chao, GAO Qiuming. Operative versus non-operative treatment for three- or four-part proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Journal of ZheJiang University(Medical Science), 2016, 45(6): 641-647.

链接本文:

http://www.zjujournals.com/xueshu/med/CN/10.3785/j.issn.1008-9292.2016.11.14        http://www.zjujournals.com/xueshu/med/CN/Y2016/V45/I6/641

[1] ROTHBERG D, HIGGINS T. Fractures of the proximal humerus[J]. Orthop Clin North Am, 2013, 44(1):9-19.
[2] FAKLER J K, HOGAN C, HEYDE C E, et al. Current concepts in the treatment of proximal humeral fractures[J]. Orthopedics, 2008, 31(1):42-51.
[3] NEER C S. Displaced proximal humeral fractures. Ⅱ. Treatment of three-part and four-part displacement[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1970, 52(6):1090-1103.
[4] ROBINSON C M, PAGE R S, HILL R M, et al. Primary hemiarthroplasty for the treatment of proximal humeral fractures[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2003, 85-A(7):1215-1223.
[5] FJALESTAD T, HOLE M Ø, HOVDEN I A, et al. Surgical treatment with an angular stable plate for complex displaced proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients:a randomized controlled trial[J]. J Orthop Trauma, 2012, 26(2):98-106.
[6] BOONS H W, GOOSEN J H, VAN GRINSVEN S, et al. Hemiarthroplasty for humeral four-part fractures for patients 65 years and older:a randomized controlled trial[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2012, 470(12):3483-3491.
[7] OLERUD P, AHRENGART L, PONZER S, et al. Hemiarthroplasty versus nonoperative treatment of displaced 4-part proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients:a randomized controlled trial[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2011, 20(7):1025-1033.
[8] OLERUD P, AHRENGART L, PONZER S, et al. Internal fixation versus nonoperative treatment of displaced 3-part proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients:a randomized controlled trial[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2011, 20(5):747-755.
[9] STABLEFORTH P G. Four-part fractures of the neck of the humerus[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 1984, 66(1):104-108.
[10] ZYTO K, AHRENGART L, SPERBER A, et al. Treatment of displaced proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 1997, 79(3):412-417.
[11] KRISTIANSEN B. Treatment of displaced fractures of the proximal humerus:transcutaneous reduction and Hoffmann's external fixation[J]. Injury, 1989, 20(4):195-199.
[12] ESSER R D. Open reduction and internal fixation of three-and four-part fractures of the proximal humerus[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1994,(299):244-251.
[13] MODA S K, CHADHA N S, SANGWAN S S, et al. Open reduction and fixation of proximal humeral fractures and fracture-dislocations[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 1990, 72(6):1050-1052.
[14] THALHAMMER G, PLATZER P, OBERLEITNER G, et al. Angular stable fixation of proximal humeral fractures[J]. J Trauma, 2009, 66(1):204-210.
[15] SVDKAMP N, BAYER J, HEPP P, et al. Open reduction and internal fixation of proximal humeral fractures with use of the locking proximal humerus plate. Results of a prospective, multicenter, observational study[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2009, 91(6):1320-1328.
[16] YÜKSEL H Y, YILMAZ S, AKSAHIN E, et al. The results of nonoperative treatment for three-and four-part fractures of the proximal humerus in low-demand patients[J]. J Orthop Trauma, 2011, 25(10):588-595.
[17] IYENGAR J J, DEVCIC Z, SPROUL R C, et al. Nonoperative treatment of proximal humerus fractures:a systematic review[J]. J Orthop Trauma, 2011, 25(10):612-617.
[1] 陈刚,张鼎,应亚草,王志峰,陶伟,朱皓,张景峰,彭志毅. 国产载药微球经动脉化疗栓塞治疗不可切除原发性肝癌的临床研究[J]. 浙江大学学报(医学版), 2017, 46(1): 44-51.
[2] 高秋明 等. Ⅰ期植骨联合非接触钢板技术治疗股骨创伤后感染性骨缺损八例[J]. 浙江大学学报(医学版), 2016, 45(6): 631-635.
[3] 夏光发 等. 新辅助化疗前后激素受体变化的乳腺癌患者辅助内分泌治疗的疗效[J]. 浙江大学学报(医学版), 2016, 45(6): 614-619.
[4] 何斌 等. 贝伐珠单克隆抗体在难治性子宫颈癌中的应用进展[J]. 浙江大学学报(医学版), 2016, 45(4): 395-402.
[5] 韩瑞 等. 贝伐珠单克隆抗体联合化疗用于Her2阴性乳腺癌患者新辅助治疗的meta分析[J]. 浙江大学学报(医学版), 2016, 45(4): 379-386.
[6] 沈海燕 等. 血小板计数可预测英夫利昔单克隆抗体治疗活动性克罗恩病的疗效[J]. 浙江大学学报(医学版), 2016, 45(1): 81-85.
[7] 翟丽萍等. 醒后缺血性卒中高龄患者静脉溶栓后临床结局的影响因素分析[J]. 浙江大学学报(医学版), 2015, 44(6): 638-644.
[8] 陈楠等. 中国精神分裂症患者不同家庭干预措施效果比较的meta分析[J]. 浙江大学学报(医学版), 2015, 44(6): 689-702.
[9] 黄学才等. 高渗盐水和甘露醇在动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血患者降低颅内压中的应用[J]. 浙江大学学报(医学版), 2015, 44(4): 389-395.
[10] 黄伟, 王蕾, 杜静, 杨建民. 窄带成像放大内镜对早期胃癌诊断价值的meta分析[J]. 浙江大学学报(医学版), 2015, 44(4): 435-442.
[11] 朱长焜, 王斐, 周雨梅, 应俊, 陈丹青. 再生育孕妇合并凶险性前置胎盘的妊娠结局分析[J]. 浙江大学学报(医学版), 2015, 44(3): 253-257.
[12] 江锦红, 徐伟来, 钱文斌. 伊马替尼治疗新诊断与重组人干扰素α2b治疗失败的慢性髓性白血病患者疗效比较[J]. 浙江大学学报(医学版), 2015, 44(2): 179-183.
[13] 元唯安, 沈知彼, 薛利, 谭文莉, 程英武, 詹松华, 詹红生. 脊柱推拿对腰椎间盘突出症患者脑功能活动的影响[J]. 浙江大学学报(医学版), 2015, 44(2): 124-130,137.
[14] 席晓平, 曾令霞, 余方方, 刘华胜. DNMT3A基因突变对急性髓系白血病预后影响的meta分析[J]. 浙江大学学报(医学版), 2015, 44(2): 197-203.
[15] 王悠清, 叶丁, 李迎君, 陈坤. 亚洲地区成人体质量指数与全因死亡率关系的meta分析[J]. 浙江大学学报(医学版), 2015, 44(2): 189-196.