Please wait a minute...
浙江大学学报(医学版)  2015, Vol. 44 Issue (6): 659-664    DOI: 10.3785/j.issn.1008-9292.2015.11.10
原著     
MicroRNA-150联合脉搏指示连续性心输出量检测指标判断脓毒症休克患者预后的临床价值
杨婉花, 吴海英, 张宏泽, 刘鸿翔, 卫玉洁, 石斌
上海市交通大学附属第一人民医院松江分院急诊危重病科, 上海 201600
Prognostic value of Picco monitoring combined with plasma microRNA-150 detection in septic shock patients
YANG Wan-hua, WU Hai-ying, ZHANG Hong-ze, LIU Hong-xiang, WEI Yu-jie, SHI Bin
Department of General Intensive Care Unit, Shanghai First People's Hospital Songjiang Branch Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai 201600, China
全文: PDF(745 KB)  
摘要: 

目的:探讨不同预后脓毒症休克患者microRNA-150水平和脉搏指示连续性心输出量(Picco)指标的变化规律,研究二者联合判断患者预后的临床价值。方法:回顾性分析2012年8月至2014年8月由上海市交通大学附属第一人民医院松江分院急诊危重病科收治的脓毒症休克患者的临床资料。研究共纳入患者48例,其中男性29例,女性19例。收集患者Picco监测参数及其他血流动力学参数,并用实时定量PCR检测患者收治时的microRNA-150水平,同时采用单因素分析、logistic多因素分析microRNA-150水平、Picco参数与患者预后的关系,Spearman相关性分析确定microRNA-150与Picco参数的关系。ROC曲线分析microRNA-150、Picco参数及二者联合判断脓毒症休克患者预后的临床价值。结果:收入急诊ICU治疗28 d后,23例患者存活,25例患者死亡。死亡患者的microRNA-150水平较低,为存活组的(61±3)%,差异有统计学意义(t=-10.32,P<0.05)。Kanplan-Meier生存曲线提示,低microRNA-150水平组和高microRNA-150水平组患者生存率分别为21.8%和68.2%,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。单因素分析结果提示,低microRNA-150水平是患者预后不良的危险因素(OR=2.176,95%CI:1.121~4.223,P<0.05)。存活组患者的心指数较高,血管外肺水指数(EVLWI)及肺毛细血管通透性指数(PVPI)均低于死亡组患者(均P<0.05),低心指数、高EVLWI、高PVPI为患者死亡的独立危险因素。MicroRNA-150水平与心指数呈正比(r=0.712,P<0.05),但与EVLWI、PVPI呈反比(r=-0.622、-0.689,均P<0.05)。MicroRNA-150与Picco参数联合较两者单独判断脓毒症患者死亡的临床价值更高。结论:较低的microRNA-150水平预示着脓毒症休克患者预后不良,Picco参数能较好地反应脓毒症休克患者的预后;microRNA-150与Picco参数联合有助于判断脓毒症休克患者不良预后。

关键词 微RNAs脓毒症休克预后血管外肺水毛细血管通透性    
Abstract

Objective: To assess the prognostic value of pulse indicator continuous cardiac output (Picco) monitoring combined with plasma microRNA-150 detection in septic shock patients. Methods: Clinical data of 48 patients with septic shock admitted in General Intensive Care Unit (GICU), Shanghai First People's Hospital Songjiang Branch Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University from August 2012 to August 2014 were analyzed retrospectively. The plasma levels of microRNA-150 in 48 patients at admission were assayed by qRT-PCR; and Picco monitoring was performed to record hemodynamic changes. The correlation of microRNA-150 or Picco parameters with prognosis of patients was assessed by univariate analysis and multivariate logistic analysis. Spearman correlation test showed the relationship between microRNA-150 and Picco parameters. Finally, the clinical value of combining microRNA-150 with Picco monitoring to predict the outcome of septic shock patients was analyzed by ROC curves. Results: Twenty-three patients survived and 25 died in 28 d after admission in GICU. Compared with survival patients, microRNA-150 was significantly lower in fatal patients (t=-10.32,P<0.05). Univariate analysis showed that low microRNA-150 level was a risk factor for poor prognosis(OR=2.176,95%CI:1.121-4.223,P<0.05). Compared with fatal cases, the cardiac index of survival patients was higher, while EVLWI and PVPI were lower. MicroRNA-150 level was positively correlated with cardiac index(r=0.712,P<0.05), negatively correlated with EVLWI and PVPI (r=-0.622 and-0.689,both P<0.05). ROC curves showed a satisfactory diagnostic efficiency of combining microRNA-150 with Picco monitoring. Conclusion: Lower microRNA-150 may indicate a poor prognosis, and Picco monitoring combined with microRNA 150 detection may improve the prognostic efficiency in septic shock patients.

Key wordsMicroRNAs    Sepsis    Shock    Prognosis    Extravascular lung water    Capillary permeability
收稿日期: 2015-08-25 出版日期: 2015-12-12
CLC:  R63  
基金资助:

上海市松江区卫生局领先专业课题(2012-Ⅲ-02)

通讯作者: 石斌(1969-)男,博士,教授,主任医师,硕士生导师,主要从事重症医学研究;E-mail:shib_shanghai@163.com;http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0727-4368     E-mail: shib_shanghai@163.com
作者简介: 杨婉花(1971-),女,硕士研究生,副主任医师,主要从事重症医学研究;E-mail:18918288442@163.com;http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5968-6420
服务  
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章  

引用本文:

杨婉花等. MicroRNA-150联合脉搏指示连续性心输出量检测指标判断脓毒症休克患者预后的临床价值[J]. 浙江大学学报(医学版), 2015, 44(6): 659-664.
YANG Wan-hua, WU Hai-ying, ZHANG Hong-ze, LIU Hong-xiang, WEI Yu-jie, SHI Bin. Prognostic value of Picco monitoring combined with plasma microRNA-150 detection in septic shock patients. Journal of ZheJiang University(Medical Science), 2015, 44(6): 659-664.

链接本文:

http://www.zjujournals.com/xueshu/med/CN/10.3785/j.issn.1008-9292.2015.11.10      或      http://www.zjujournals.com/xueshu/med/CN/Y2015/V44/I6/659

[1] FRIEDMAN M L, BONE M F. Management of pediatric septic shock in the emergency department[J]. Clin Pediatr Emerg Med, 2014, 15(2):131-139.
[2] KEEGAN J, WIRA C R 3RD. Early identification and management of patients with severe sepsis and septic shock in the emergency department[J]. Emerg Med Clin North Am,2014, 32 (4):759-776.
[3] YU T, PENG X, LIU L, et al. Propofol increases preload dependency in septic shock patients[J]. J Surg Res, 2015, 193 (2):849-855.
[4] 曾小莉, 张韶岩, 张京岚, 等. 微小RNA-150在脓毒症患者外周血白细胞的表达及其临床意义[J]. 中国呼吸与危重监护杂志, 2011, 10(4):360-364. ZENG Xiao-li, ZHANG Shao-yan, ZHANG Jing-lan, et al. Expression of microRNA-150 in peripheral blood leukocytes in sepsis patients and its clinical significance[J]. Chinese Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 2011, 10(4):360-364.(in Chinese)
[5] DELLINGER R P, LEVY M M, RHODES A, et al. Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2012[J]. Crit Care Med, 2013,41(2):580-637.
[6] TUPCHONG K, KOYFMAN A, FORAN M. Sepsis, severe sepsis, and septic shock: a review of the literature[J]. African Journal of Emergency Medicine, 2015,5:127-135.
[7] 卢年芳, 郑瑞强, 林 华, 等. PiCCO指导下集束化治疗感染性休克的临床研究[J]. 中华危重病急救医学, 2014, 26(1):23-27. LU Nian-fang, ZHENG Rui-qiang, LIN Hua, et al. Clinical studies of surviving sepsis bundles according to PiCCO on septic shock patients[J]. Chinese Critical Care Medicine, 2014, 26(1):23-27.(in Chinese)
[8] 刘晓耘, 戢文利,梅华鲜. PiCCO在脓毒性休克患者中的应用策略[J]. 南昌大学学报(医学版), 2014,(4):41-44. LIU Xiao-yun, JI Wen-li,MEI Hua-xian. Application of pulse-indicated continuous cardiac output in patients with septic shock[J]. Journal of Nanchang University(Medical Sciences), 2014,(4):41-44.(in Chinese)
[9] 范 震, 蔡国龙, 严 静. MicroRNA对脓毒症炎症因子的调控[J]. 中国急救医学, 2010, 30 (3):271-274. FAN Zhen, CAI Guo-long, YAN Jing. MicroRNA in the regulation of inflammatory factors in sepsis[J]. Chinese Journal of Critical Care Medicine, 2010, 30(3):271-274.(in Chinese)
[10] 吕 鑫,张育才. 微小RNA在脓毒症发病机制的作用研究进展[J]. 中华实用儿科临床杂志, 2014, 29(18): 1416-1418. LYU Xin,ZHANG Yu-cai. Progress of microRNAs in pathogenesis of sepsis[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Clinical Pediatrics, 2014, 29(18):1416-1418.(in Chinese)
[1] 蔡成,王建平,钟志凤,戴志慧,王庆华,董武真,施红旗,刘庆伟,杜金林. 缺氧诱导因子1α和CD133预测直肠癌患者新辅助放化疗疗效的临床研究[J]. 浙江大学学报(医学版), 2017, 46(1): 36-43.
[2] 杨晓红 等. 微RNA-705对MC3T3-E1细胞成骨分化能力的影响[J]. 浙江大学学报(医学版), 2016, 45(6): 575-580.
[3] 陈晓静 等. 微RNA-let-7e-3p在宫颈上皮内瘤变和宫颈癌组织中的表达及临床意义[J]. 浙江大学学报(医学版), 2016, 45(4): 342-348.
[4] 杨肃文 等. 意义未明单克隆免疫球蛋白病及多发性骨髓瘤患者微RNA-221和微RNA-222的表达[J]. 浙江大学学报(医学版), 2016, 45(4): 371-378.
[5] 方敏波 等. 瞬时受体电位通道M2外显子单核苷酸多态性rs1556314与脓毒症的相关性分析[J]. 浙江大学学报(医学版), 2016, 45(4): 410-415.
[6] 边薇 等. 临时血液透析对维持性腹膜透析患者生存预后的影响[J]. 浙江大学学报(医学版), 2016, 45(2): 195-200.
[7] 王程 等. 微RNA:一类新的椎间盘退变调控因子[J]. 浙江大学学报(医学版), 2016, 45(2): 170-178.
[8] 徐芳英 等. 神经内分泌分化在胃腺癌进展及患者预后中的意义[J]. 浙江大学学报(医学版), 2016, 45(1): 24-30.
[9] 严慎强等. 既往抗血小板治疗对合并颅内微出血急性缺血性卒中患者静脉溶栓的安全性分析[J]. 浙江大学学报(医学版), 2015, 44(6): 618-624.
[10] 韩亮, 侯金超, 方向明. 苏拉明对脓毒症小鼠肺组织和循环炎症反应的抑制作用[J]. 浙江大学学报(医学版), 2015, 44(5): 553-558.
[11] 闫伟等. 经翼点小骨窗入路治疗前循环颅内动脉瘤患者临床疗效分析[J]. 浙江大学学报(医学版), 2015, 44(4): 366-370.
[12] 赵遵兰等. 微小RNA-21对人乳腺癌细胞株紫杉醇耐药性的影响及其机制[J]. 浙江大学学报(医学版), 2015, 44(4): 400-409.
[13] 王科等. 进展性脑挫裂伤危险因素及与预后关系的分析[J]. 浙江大学学报(医学版), 2015, 44(4): 410-416.
[14] 韩艳霞, 尤良顺, 刘辉, 毛莉萍, 叶琇锦, 钱文斌. 细胞周期蛋白依赖激酶抑制剂诱导HL-60细胞凋亡及分子机制研究[J]. 浙江大学学报(医学版), 2015, 44(2): 174-178.
[15] 席晓平, 曾令霞, 余方方, 刘华胜. DNMT3A基因突变对急性髓系白血病预后影响的meta分析[J]. 浙江大学学报(医学版), 2015, 44(2): 197-203.