Please wait a minute...
浙江大学学报(医学版)  2015, Vol. 44 Issue (6): 603-610,617    DOI: 10.3785/j.issn.1008-9292.2015.11.02
专题报道     
急性缺血性卒中患者静脉溶栓后24小时血压变异与血流再灌注的相关性研究
刘克勤1,2, 陈清梦1, 严慎强1, 张圣1, 楼敏1
1. 浙江大学医学院附属第二医院神经内科, 浙江 杭州 310009;
2. 杭州市第一人民医院神经内科, 浙江 杭州 310006
Relationship between early blood pressure variability and reperfusion in acute ischemic stroke patients with intravenous thrombolysis
LIU Ke-qin1,2, CHEN Qing-meng1, YAN Shen-qiang1, ZHANG Sheng1, LOU Min1
1. Department of Neurology, the Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310009, China;
2. Department of Neurology, Hangzhou First People's Hospital, Hangzhou 310009, China
全文: PDF(2026 KB)  
摘要: 

目的:明确急性缺血性卒中患者静脉溶栓后24 h血压变异对脑组织再灌注以及3个月后神经功能结局的影响。方法:连续收集2009年6月至2014年9月期间在浙江大学医学院附属第二医院行多模式MRI检查或CT灌注扫描,接受静脉溶栓治疗的急性缺血性卒中患者的临床、影像、溶栓后24 h内动态血压监测资料,评估溶栓后24 h再灌注情况及3个月改良Rankin评分。记录血压均值和变异指标,后者包括标准差(sd)、连续变异度(sv)、上升变异(sv-rise)和下降变异(sv-drop)。采用二元logistic回归分析血压变异指标对再灌注及神经功能结局的影响。结果:最终纳入188例患者,其中114例(60.6%)达到再灌注,74例(39.4%)未达到再灌注。二元logistic回归分析提示,静脉溶栓后24 h内收缩压连续变异(SBPsv),尤其是上升变异(SBPsv-rise)较大者不易达到再灌注(sv:OR=0.421,95%CI:0.187~0.950,P=0.037;sv-rise:OR=0.311,95%CI:0.137~0.704,P=0.005)。同时,静脉溶栓后24 h SBPsv-rise高者不易达到早期神经功能恢复(OR=0.372,95%CI:0.166~0.832,P=0.016);SBPsv、SBPsv-rise和SBPsv-drop是溶栓治疗3个月后患者神经功能不良结局的独立危险因素(sv:OR=6.381,95%CI:2.132~19.096,P=0.001;sv-rise:OR=5.615,95%CI:2.152~14.654,P<0.001;sv-drop:OR=3.009,95%CI: 1.263~7.169,P=0.013)。结论:急性缺血性卒中患者早期收缩压变异越大越不利于脑组织再灌注和早期神经功能恢复,并与静脉溶栓治疗后3个月患者神经功能不良结局有关。

关键词 卒中/药物疗法急性病脑缺血/药物疗法组织型纤溶酶原激活物/治疗应用血栓溶解疗法血压再灌注    
Abstract

Objective: To investigat the impacts of blood pressure (BP) variability on reperfusion and long-term outcome in patients with acute ischemic stroke after intravenous thrombolysis (IVT). Methods: The clinical data of 188 patients with acute ischemic stroke receiving IVT in Department of Neurology, the Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine from June 2009 to September 2014, including hour-to-hour BP measurements, clinical manifestations, laboratory tests and radiologic findings were retrospectively analyzed. The mean 24-h BP values, and BP variability profiles, including standard deviation (sd), average squared difference between successive measurements (sv), average squared difference between rise and drop successive measurements (sv-rise and sv-drop) were calculated. Reperfusion, defined as >50% reduction in Tmax >6 s perfusion lesion volume from baseline to follow-up scans, and clinical neurological outcome based on modified Rankin scale (mRS) at 3 months after onset were also analyzed. The favorable outcome was defined as mRS 0-1 and unfavorable outcome as mRS 2-6. The binary logistic-regression model was performed to determine the independent risk factors of reperfusion and favorable outcome, respectively. Results: Among 188 patients, 114 (60.6%) achieved reperfusion. During the 0-to-24 h blood pressure course, only systolic blood pressure (SBP) variability parameters were negatively correlated with reperfusion (sv: OR=0.421, 95%CI:0.187-0.950, P=0.037; sv-rise: OR=0.311, 95%CI:0.137-0.704, P=0.005) and long-term clinical outcomes (sv: OR=6.381, 95%CI:2.132-19.096, P=0.001; sv-rise: OR=5.615, 95%CI:2.152-14.654, P<0.001; sv-drop: OR=3.009, 95%CI:1.263-7.169, P=0.013). Conclusion: SBP variability during the first 24 hours after IVT is negatively associated with cerebral reperfusion and unfavorable neurological outcome in patients with acute ischemic stroke receiving IVT.

Key wordsStroke/drug therapy    Acute disease    Brain ischemia/drug therapy    Tissue plasminogen activator/therapeutic use    Thrombolytic therapy    Blood pressure    Reperfusion    Brain [ J Zhejiang Univ (Medical Sci), 2015,44(6):603-610,617.]
收稿日期: 2015-09-20 出版日期: 2015-12-12
CLC:  R743  
基金资助:

浙江省重大科技专项计划(2013C03043-3);国家自然科学基金(81171095,81471170)

通讯作者: 楼敏(1976-),女,博士,教授,主任医师,博士生导师,从事神经病学研究;E-mail:loumingxc@vip.sina.com;http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6627-064X     E-mail: loumingxc@vip.sina.com
作者简介: 刘克勤(1988-),女,博士研究生,住院医师,从事神经病学研究;E-mail:liukeqin@zju.edu.cn;http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6344-3261
服务  
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章  

引用本文:

刘克勤等. 急性缺血性卒中患者静脉溶栓后24小时血压变异与血流再灌注的相关性研究[J]. 浙江大学学报(医学版), 2015, 44(6): 603-610,617.
LIU Ke-qin, CHEN Qing-meng, YAN Shen-qiang, ZHANG Sheng, LOU Min. Relationship between early blood pressure variability and reperfusion in acute ischemic stroke patients with intravenous thrombolysis. Journal of ZheJiang University(Medical Science), 2015, 44(6): 603-610,617.

链接本文:

http://www.zjujournals.com/xueshu/med/CN/10.3785/j.issn.1008-9292.2015.11.02      或      http://www.zjujournals.com/xueshu/med/CN/Y2015/V44/I6/603

[1] LEONARDI-BEE J, BATH P M, PHILLIPS S J, et al. Blood pressure and clinical outcomes in the International Stroke Trial[J]. Stroke, 2002, 33(5):1315-1320.
[2] CASTILLO J, LEIRA R, GARCÍA M M, et al. Blood pressure decrease during the acute phase of ischemic stroke is associated with brain injury and poor stroke outcome[J]. Stroke, 2004, 35(2):520-526.
[3] OKUMURA K, OHYA Y, MAEHARA A, et al. Effects of blood pressure levels on case fatality after acute stroke[J]. J Hypertens, 2005, 23(6):1217-1223.
[4] VEMMOS K N, TSIVGOULIS G, SPENGOS K, et al. U-shaped relationship between mortality and admission blood pressure in patients with acute stroke[J]. J Intern Med, 2004, 255(2):257-265.
[5] SANDSET E C, BATH P M, BOYSEN G, et al. The angiotensin-receptor blocker candesartan for treatment of acute stroke(SCAST):a randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial[J]. Lancet, 2011, 377(9767):741-750.
[6] POTTER J F, ROBINSON T G, FORD G A, et al. Controlling hypertension and hypotension immediately post-stroke (CHHIPS):a randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind pilot trial[J]. Lancet Neurol, 2009, 8(1):48-56.
[7] ROBINSON T G, POTTER J F, FORD G A, et al. Effects of antihypertensive treatment after acute stroke in the Continue or Stop Post-Stroke Antihypertensives Collaborative Study(COSSACS):a prospective, randomised, open, blinded-endpoint trial[J]. Lancet Neurol, 2010, 9(8):767-775.
[8] MIAO C Y, XIE H H, ZHAN L S, et al. Blood pressure variability is more important than blood pressure level in determination of end-organ damage in rats[J]. J Hypertens, 2006, 24(6):1125-1235.
[9] SU D F, MIAO C Y. Blood pressure variability and organ damage[J]. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol, 2001, 28(9):709-715.
[10] YONG M, KASTE M. Association of characteristics of blood pressure profiles and stroke outcomes in the ECASS-II trial[J]. Stroke, 2008, 39(2):366-372.
[11] KO Y, PARK J H, YANG M H, et al. The significance of blood pressure variability for the development of hemorrhagic transformation in acute ischemic stroke[J]. Stroke, 2010, 41(11):2512-2518.[LL]
[12] KELLERT L, SYKORA M, GUMBINGER C, et al. Blood pressure variability after intravenous thrombolysis in acute stroke does not predict intracerebral hemorrhage but poor outcome[J]. Cerebrovasc Dis, 2012, 33(2):135-140.
[13] ENDO K, KARIO K, KOGA M, et al. Impact of early blood pressure variability on stroke outcomes after thrombolysis:the SAMURAI rt-PA Registry[J]. Stroke, 2013, 44(3):816-818.
[14] 楼敏,严余清,陈智才,等. 灌注加权成像-弥散加权成像不匹配与缺血性卒中静脉溶栓后早期再灌注的相关性[J]. 中华神经科杂志,2012,45(7):471-477. LOU Min, YAN Yu-qing, Chen Zhi-cai, et al. Correlation between perfusion weighted imaging-diffusion weighted imaging mismatch and early reperfusion after intravenous thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke[J]. Chinese Journal of Neurology, 2012, 45(7):471-477. (in Chinese)
[15] 虞雁南,丁信法,张圣,等. CT灌注预测急性缺血性卒中患者缺血半暗带和核心梗死区的最佳灌注参数阈值探讨[J]. 浙江大学学报(医学版),2014,43(01):7-13. YU Yan-nan, Ding Xin-fa, ZHANG Sheng, et al. Thresholds of CT perfusion in predicting ischemic penumbra and infarct core in patients with acute ischemic stroke[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University (Medical Sciences), 2014, 43(01):7-13.(in Chinese)
[16] CAMPBELL B C, CHRISTENSEN S, TRESS B M, et al. Failure of collateral blood flow is associated with infarct growth in ischemic stroke[J]. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab, 2013, 33(8):1168-1172.
[17] CAMPBELL B C, CHRISTENSEN S, LEVI C R, et al. Cerebral blood flow is the optimal CT perfusion parameter for assessing infarct core[J]. Stroke, 2011, 42(12):3435-3440.
[18] DAWSON S L, PANERAI R B, POTTER J F. Serial changes in static and dynamic cerebral autoregulation after acute ischaemic stroke[J]. Cerebrovasc Dis, 2003, 16(1):69-75.
[19] DELGADO-MEDEROS R, RIBO M, ROVIRA A, et al. Prognostic significance of blood pressure variability after thrombolysis in acute stroke[J]. Neurology, 2008, 71(8):552-558.
[20] KIKUYA M, HOZAWA A, OHOKUBO T, et al. Prognostic significance of blood pressure and heart rate variabilities:the Ohasama study[J]. Hypertension 2000, 36(5):901-906.
[21] MENA L, PINTOS S, QUEIPO N V, et al. A reliable index for the prognostic significance of blood pressure variability[J]. J Hypertens, 2005, 23(3):505-511.
[22] GEORGIADIS A L, AL-KAWI A, JANJUA N, et al. Cerebral angiography can demonstrate changes in collateral flow during induced hypertension[J]. Radiol Case Rep, 2007, 2(4):37.
[23] RORDORF G, CRAMER S C, EFIRD J T, et al. Pharmacological elevation of blood pressure in acute stroke. Clinical effects and safety[J]. Stroke, 1997, 28(11):2133-2138.
[24] RORDORF G, KOROSHETZ W J, EZZEDDINE M A, et al. A pilot study of drug-induced hypertension for treatment of acute stroke[J]. Neurology, 2001, 56(9):1210-1213.
[1] 吴菡,王钟瑾,明文杰,王爽,丁美萍. 长程视频脑电图监测癫痫患者发作间期痫样放电的时段分析[J]. 浙江大学学报(医学版), 2017, 46(1): 30-35.
[2] 白石 等. 雷公藤甲素缓解局灶性脑组织缺血再灌注损伤诱发的炎症及其相关凋亡的研究[J]. 浙江大学学报(医学版), 2016, 45(5): 493-500.
[3] 叶彬娴 等. 慢性肾脏病患者主动脉僵硬度相关指数变化及影响因素分析[J]. 浙江大学学报(医学版), 2016, 45(5): 508-514.
[4] 何瞻 等. 以慢性硬脑膜下血肿为发病表现的特发性肥厚性硬脑膜炎一例[J]. 浙江大学学报(医学版), 2016, 45(5): 540-543.
[5] 蒋倩倩 等. 高血压伴阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停低通气综合征患者肾功能影响因素分析[J]. 浙江大学学报(医学版), 2016, 45(3): 261-267.
[6] 陆俊秀 等. 血流动力学改变对动脉导管未闭早产儿脑白质损伤发生的影响[J]. 浙江大学学报(医学版), 2016, 45(3): 287-291.
[7] 郎夏冰 等. 中国住院患者急性肾损伤流行病学调查现状[J]. 浙江大学学报(医学版), 2016, 45(2): 208-213.
[8] 赵雅莹 等. 门静脉高压自发性分流患者食管胃底静脉曲张特点[J]. 浙江大学学报(医学版), 2016, 45(1): 75-80.
[9] 陈清梦等. 利用CT灌注评估大脑中动脉闭塞患者血栓长度并预测血管再通[J]. 浙江大学学报(医学版), 2015, 44(6): 611-617.
[10] 宋瑞瑞等. 亚急性期缺血性卒中患者弥散加权成像高信号病灶的体素内不相干运动研究[J]. 浙江大学学报(医学版), 2015, 44(6): 632-637,644.
[11] 翟丽萍等. 醒后缺血性卒中高龄患者静脉溶栓后临床结局的影响因素分析[J]. 浙江大学学报(医学版), 2015, 44(6): 638-644.
[12] 徐超等. 磁敏感加权成像毛刷征预测急性缺血性卒中患者静脉溶栓后出血转化的意义[J]. 浙江大学学报(医学版), 2015, 44(6): 625-631.
[13] 严慎强等. 既往抗血小板治疗对合并颅内微出血急性缺血性卒中患者静脉溶栓的安全性分析[J]. 浙江大学学报(医学版), 2015, 44(6): 618-624.
[14] 王科等. 进展性脑挫裂伤危险因素及与预后关系的分析[J]. 浙江大学学报(医学版), 2015, 44(4): 410-416.
[15] 王真等. 脑干海绵状血管瘤及其手术治疗[J]. 浙江大学学报(医学版), 2015, 44(4): 371-375.