Please wait a minute...
工程设计学报
工程设计学报  2016, Vol. 23 Issue (3): 217-221    DOI: 10.3785/j.issn. 1006-754X.2016.03.004
保质设计     
基于经济损失的风险优先值排序方法研究及应用
关玉明, 刘慧娟, 刘琴, 王锡瑞, 许波
河北工业大学 机械工程学院, 天津 300130
Research and application of risk priority number ranking method based on the economic losses
GUAN Yu-ming, LIU Hui-juan, LIU Qin, WANG Xi-rui, XU Bo
School of Mechanical Engineering, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin 300130, China
 全文: PDF(1523 KB)   HTML
摘要：

针对传统失效模式和影响分析(FMEA)中风险优先等级(RPN)分析方法存在的离散性、重复性,以及灵敏度低、准确性差等缺陷,提出了一种基于经济损失的风险优先值排序方法——ERPN(risk priority number ranking method based on the economic losses).该方法采用定性与定量相结合的方式,首先确定某潜在失效情景的严重度,然后根据相关数据确定某初始事件发生概率以及此潜在失效情景所导致的经济损失,用两者的乘积作为ERPN值.该方法直接可观,可操作性强,具有较好的工程实用性.将其与基于反向鱼骨图的结构分解、基于情景的失效分析相结合,综合应用在自动包装生产线的送膜包覆装置的失效分析中,取得了很好的效果.
关键词： 失效分析;  经济损失;  ERPN排序方法;  反向鱼骨图;  工程实例    
Abstract:

Aiming at the defects of conventional Risk Priority Number (RPN) methodology in Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA),such as discreteness,repeatability,low sensitivity and low accuracy,a new approach based on the economic losses named ERPN was proposed.The proposed approach consisted of two stages:qualitative analysis and quantitative analysis.The first stage aimed at determining the severity of a potential failure situation while the main task of the second stage was to calculate the probability (P) of the initial event and the economic losses (E),then took the product of the two (P and E) as the ERPN value.The new method is direct and objective and has strong maneuverability and good practicability.Besides,reverse fishbone diagram was applied to decompose the structure and the scenario theory was utilized to help analyze the failure situation.Finally,this method was used to deal with the risk priority evaluation of the failure modes of the membrane sending and packing device in the automatic packaging production line,and a satisfactory result was obtained.
Key words: failure analysis    economic loss    ERPN ranking method    reverse fishbone diagram    engineering example
收稿日期: 2015-09-30 出版日期: 2016-06-28
CLC:  TH11  
作者简介: 关玉明(1957-),男,河北沧州人,教授,博士生导师,从事机电成套设备研究,E-mail:gyuming@163.com.http://orcid.org//0000-0002-9913-5348
服务　　
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章　　
关玉明
刘慧娟
刘琴
王锡瑞
许波

引用本文:

关玉明, 刘慧娟, 刘琴, 王锡瑞, 许波. 基于经济损失的风险优先值排序方法研究及应用[J]. 工程设计学报, 2016, 23(3): 217-221.

GUAN Yu-ming, LIU Hui-juan, LIU Qin, WANG Xi-rui, XU Bo. Research and application of risk priority number ranking method based on the economic losses. Chinese Journal of Engineering Design, 2016, 23(3): 217-221.

链接本文:

https://www.zjujournals.com/gcsjxb/CN/10.3785/j.issn. 1006-754X.2016.03.004    或    https://www.zjujournals.com/gcsjxb/CN/Y2016/V23/I3/217

[1] LIU Hu-chen,LIU Long,LIU Nan.Risk evaluation approaches in failure mode and effects analysis:a literature review[J].Expert Systems with Applications,2013,40(2):828-838.

[2] LIU Hu-chen,FAN Xiao-jun,LI Ping,et al.Evaluating the risk of failure modes with extended MULTIMOORA method under fuzzy environment[J].Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence,2014,34(C):168-177.

[3] LIU Hu-chen,YOU Jian-xin,FAN Xiao-jun,et al.Failure mode and effects analysis using D numbers and grey relational projection method[J].Expert Systems with Applications,2014,41(10):4670-4679.

[4] LIU Hu-chen,YOU Jian-xin,YOU Xiao-yue,et al.A novel approach for failure mode and effects analysis using combination weighting and fuzzy VIKOR method[J].Applied Soft Computing Journal,2015,28:579-588.

[5] LIU Hu-chen,YOU Jian-xin,LIN Qing-lian et al.Risk assessment in system FMEA combining fuzzy weighted average with fuzzy decision making trial and evaluation laboratory[J].International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing,2015,28 (7):701-714.

[6] BOWLES J B.An assessment of RPN prioritization in a failure modes effects and criticality analysis [C]//Proceedings of Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium.Tampa Florida:IEEE,2003:380-386.

[7] 陈政平,付桂翠,赵幼虎.改进的风险优先数(RPN)分析方法[J].北京航空航天大学学报,2011,37(11):1395-1399. CHEN Zheng-ping,FU Gui-cui,ZHAO You-hu.The improved risk priority number (RPN) analysis method[J].Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics,2011,37(11):1395-1399.

[8] 晋民杰,李辰,范英,等.基于损失费用的风险优先数分析方法研究[J].中国安全科学学报,2013,23(9):45-50. JIN Min-jie,LI Chen,FAN Ying,et al.Research on Risk Priority Number analysis method based on loss[J].China Safety Science Journal,2013,23(9):45-50.

[9] KUTLU A C,EKMEKCIOGLU M.Fuzzy failure modes and effects analysis by using fuzzy TOPSIS-based fuzzy AHP[J].Expert Systems with Applications,2012,39(1):61-67.

[10] CHANG K H,WEN T C.A novel efficient approach for DFMEA combining 2-tuple and the OWA operator[J].Expert Systems with Applications,2010,37(3):2362-2370.

[11] GEUM Y,CHO Y,PARK Y.A systematic approach for diagnosing service failure:service-specific FMEA and grey relational analysis approach[J].Mathematical and Computer Modelling,2011,54(11):3126-3142.

[12] CHIN K S,WANG Y M,POON G K K,et al.Failure mode and effects analysis using a group-based evidential reasoning approach[J].Computers & Operations Research,2009,36(6):1768-1779.

[13] CHIN K S,WANG Y M,POON G K K,et al.Failure mode and effects analysis by data envelopment analysis[J].Decision Support Systems,2009,48(1):246-256.

[14] CARMIGNANI G.An integrated structural framework to cost-based FMECA:the priority-cost FMECA[J].Reliability Engineering and Systems Safety,2009,94(4):861-871.

[15] ZAMMORI F,GABBRIELLI R.ANP/RPN:a multi criteria evaluation of the risk priority number[J].Quality and Reliability Engineering International,2011,28(1):85-104.
[1] 陈文华, 朱旭洋, 陈晓英, 李小辉, 潘骏. 突跳式温控器的失效分析[J]. 工程设计学报, 2013, 20(4): 287-292.
[2] 许波, 檀润华, 孟照建, 刘丽峰. 基于冲突解决理论的失效分析方法（AFD-1）模板研究[J]. 工程设计学报, 2013, 20(2): 85-88.
[3] 吴江. 航空活塞发动机曲轴配重组件失效机理研究[J]. 工程设计学报, 2011, 18(6): 457-462.
[4] 刘文光, 吴 晖, 陈扬枝. 微弹性啮合轮的传动力及失效分析[J]. 工程设计学报, 2008, 15(2): 105-108.
[5] 韦子辉, 檀润华, 孙建广, 陈香香. 基于TRIZ的AFD失效分析方法[J]. 工程设计学报, 2007, 14(5): 354-358.
[6] 檀润华, 苑彩云, 曹国忠, 张瑞红. 反向鱼骨图下的现有产品功能模型建立[J]. 工程设计学报, 2003, 10(4): 197-201.