Please wait a minute...
工程设计学报
工程设计学报  2013, Vol. 20 Issue (1): 6-10    
工程设计理论、方法与技术     
基于信息熵多属性决策的物流供应商选择评价
 何满辉, 逯林
辽宁工程技术大学 工商管理学院，辽宁 葫芦岛 125105
Evaluation of selecting logistics provider based on entropy and MADM
 HE  Man-Hui, LU  Lin
College of Business Administration, Liaoning Technical University， Huludao 125105， China
 全文: PDF(608 KB)   HTML
摘要： 生产商选择合适的物流供应商有利于降低营运成本，提高竞争优势.高效的第三方物流活动在增强企业核心竞争力、降低企业成本等方面起着重要作用.针对传统的熵值和熵权计算公式的不足，提出改进的熵权计算公式.同时把专家的主观权重和样本自身产生的熵权相结合，通过一定的方式混合加权作为不确定属性的权重.在此基础上结合多属性决策模型建立多属性决策评价方法.该方法将主、客观分析相结合，具有一定的优势：既减少了决策问题的主观性，又使得整个评价过程能够量化，有效解决了第三方物流供应商选择评价中的不确定多属性决策问题.最后通过实例分析证明该方法的可行性和有效性.
关键词： 物流供应商;  信息熵;  熵权;  多属性决策;  属性权重    
Abstract: electing an appropriate logistics provider will help manufacturers to reduce operating costs and improve competitive advantage. Efficient TPL activity has played an important role in improving enterprise core competitiveness and reducing manufacturing cost. In view of the disadvantages of traditional entropy and entropy calculation formulas， an improved entropy formula was put forward. Meanwhile， through combining experts subjective weight with entropy weight generated by sample， we used multi-attribute weights as uncertain attribute weight in certain way. Then， multi-attribute decisionmaking evaluation method was established combined with multi-attribute decisionmaking model based on this. This method has certain advantages in the aspect of combining subjective and objective: it has not only reduced the subjectivity of the decision problems， but also made the whole process to be quantified evaluation. Besides， it has also solved the uncertain multi-attribute decision problems effectively. Finally， data analysis was given to prove that this method was feasible and efficacious．
Key words: logistics provider    entropy    entropy weight    multi-attribute decision    attribute weight
出版日期: 2013-02-28
基金资助:

国家自然科学基金资助项目（70971059）；辽宁省教育厅人文社会科学研究项目（2009A342）.
服务　　
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章　　
何满辉
逯林

引用本文:

何满辉, 逯林. 基于信息熵多属性决策的物流供应商选择评价[J]. 工程设计学报, 2013, 20(1): 6-10.

HE Man-Hui, LU Lin. Evaluation of selecting logistics provider based on entropy and MADM. Chinese Journal of Engineering Design, 2013, 20(1): 6-10.

链接本文:

https://www.zjujournals.com/gcsjxb/CN/    或    https://www.zjujournals.com/gcsjxb/CN/Y2013/V20/I1/6

[1] 孙之琳, 王凯峰, 陈永亮, 薛德意, 顾佩华. 产品可适应设计评价的信息熵方法[J]. 工程设计学报, 2021, 28(1): 1-13.
[2] 平恩顺，檀润华，孙建广，张建辉. 基于突变理论的机械产品突破性创新耗散结构模型及其评价[J]. 工程设计学报, 2014, 21(6): 513-521.
[3] 周书敬, 高延安. 基于信息熵改进的粒子群算法在桁架结构[J]. 工程设计学报, 2012, 19(5): 340-344.
[4] 卢青波, 张学良, 温淑花, 兰国生, 刘丽琴. 基于差异演化算法和多属性决策的机电系统可靠性多目标优化设计[J]. 工程设计学报, 2011, 18(6): 412-417.
[5] 陈永亮, 满佳, 曲艺, 包能胜, 顾佩华. 机械产品可适应性度量方法及应用[J]. 工程设计学报, 2010, 17(1): 1-11.