Please wait a minute...
工程设计学报  2010, Vol. 17 Issue (3): 229-235    
工程设计理论、方法与技术     
双筒式减振器异响试验分析
 么鸣涛, 顾 亮, 管继富
北京理工大学 机械与车辆学院,北京 100081
Analysis of abnormal noise test of twintube shock absorber
 ME  Ming-Tao, GU  Liang, GUAN  Ji-Fu
School of Mechanical and Vehicular Engineering, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China
 全文: PDF(2241 KB)   HTML
摘要: 减振器在工作过程中产生的异响是其内部质量的外在体现,是影响车辆声学舒适性的一个重要因素.为了更好地分析减振器异响问题,模仿实车中的减振器安装方式,在电液伺服减振器道路模拟系统上对其进行台架试验,分别采用时域分析和频域分析的方法来研究减振器异响的产生机理.在减振器行程换向时,正常件的活塞杆加速度峰值小于异响件的活塞杆加速度峰值.正常减振器和异响减振器活塞杆加速度功率谱均方根值在500~1 000 Hz带宽内存在较大差异,并且这种差异随着试验频率的增大而愈加明显,正常减振器在此带宽内的活塞杆振动能量小于异响减振器的活塞杆振动能量.通过对双筒式减振器进行异响试验分析,可为工程应用中减振器异响的分析及评价研究提供参考.
关键词: 减振器异响声学舒适性    
Abstract: The abnormal noise which occurres in the course of work process of shock absorber is the outer reflection of its interior quality, and is also one of important factors to affect vehicle acoustics comfort. By imitating the installation of shock absorber in the real car, the rig test of shock absorber was performed on the electro-hydraulic servo shock absorber road analogous system for better analysis of the abnormal noise, and then its creation mechanism was researched separately by making use of time domain analysis and frequency domain analysis. When the direction of the shock absorber was switching, the acceleration peak value of normal workpiece piston rod was less than the abnormal noise workpiece's. There is a big difference between the normal shock absorber and abnormal noise shock absorber in the acceleration power spectrum RMS value of piston rod from 500 Hz to 1 000 Hz, and the difference was more obvious along with the increasing of the test frequency, moreover in this bandwidth the piston rod vibration energy of normal shock absorber is less than the abnormal noise shock absorber's. By carrying out abnormal noise test and analysis on the twin-tube shock absorber, it can provide references for the analysis and evaluation as well as study of shock absorber in the engineering applications.
Key words: shock absorber    abnormal noise    acoustics comfort
出版日期: 2010-06-28
:  TH 703.63  
基金资助:

部级装备预先研究基金资助项目(51404040104BQ01)

服务  
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章  
么鸣涛
顾亮
管继富

引用本文:

么鸣涛, 顾亮, 管继富. 双筒式减振器异响试验分析[J]. 工程设计学报, 2010, 17(3): 229-235.

ME Ming-Tao, GU Liang, GUAN Ji-Fu. Analysis of abnormal noise test of twintube shock absorber[J]. Chinese Journal of Engineering Design, 2010, 17(3): 229-235.

链接本文:

https://www.zjujournals.com/gcsjxb/CN/        https://www.zjujournals.com/gcsjxb/CN/Y2010/V17/I3/229

[1] 张超, 韩晓明, 李强, 李池. 冲击载荷下永磁式电涡流减振器设计及动态特性分析[J]. 工程设计学报, 2020, 27(6): 786-794.
[2] 姚嘉凌, 唐郑, 柏亚男. 基于剪切式磁流变减振器的车辆侧倾与平顺性协调控制[J]. 工程设计学报, 2020, 27(2): 191-198.
[3] 段福斌, 潘骏, 陈文华, 徐瀚辉, 杨礼康. 双筒式液压减振器阻尼力建模与灵敏度分析[J]. 工程设计学报, 2017, 24(2): 149-155.
[4] 郭孔辉, 隋记魁, 宋晓琳, 郭耀华, 薛冰. 高速车辆横向减振器模糊天棚半主动控制研究[J]. 工程设计学报, 2012, 19(3): 174-181.
[5] 陈嫦, 唐进元. 基于20-sim的减振器试验台液压系统键合图建模与动态仿真分析[J]. 工程设计学报, 2010, 17(5): 339-344.
[6] 潘双夏, 张伟谦, 王维锐, 吴参. 基于修正Backlash滞环的磁流变减振器建模[J]. 工程设计学报, 2010, 17(4): 258-262.
[7] 刘建勇, 李庆伟, 王国丽, 张少静. 双筒式液力减振器低速阻尼特性研究[J]. 工程设计学报, 2009, 16(3): 233-236.
[8] 张进秋,潘剑,韩士锋,王伟. 叶片式磁流变液减振器的结构设计及磁场分析[J]. 工程设计学报, 2007, 14(2): 121-125.