面向图神经网络谣言检测器的高效攻击模型
|
|
范业博,李逸成,刘勇,张薇
|
Efficient attack model targeting GNN-based rumor detectors
|
|
Yebo FAN,Yicheng LI,Yong LIU,Wei ZHANG
|
|
| 表 2 不同模型在2个数据集上针对6种图神经网络架构的攻击成功率比较 |
| Tab.2 Comparison of attack success rate across different models, two datasets and six GNN architectures |
|
| 新闻类型 | 模型 | ASR(Politifact) | | ASR(Gossipcop) | | GCN | GAT | SAGE | U-GCN | U-GAT | U-SAGE | | GCN | GAT | SAGE | U-GCN | U-GAT | U-SAGE | | 假新闻 | 未受攻击 | 0.20 | 0.20 | 0.27 | 0.26 | 0.27 | 0.26 | | 0.02 | 0.04 | 0.10 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.02 | | DICE | 0.29 | 0.34 | 0.37 | 0.31 | 0.28 | 0.52 | | 0.04 | 0.08 | 0.10 | 0.04 | 0.06 | 0.06 | | MARL | 0.97 | 0.43 | 0.56 | 0.39 | 0.31 | 0.56 | | 0.63 | 0.21 | 0.31 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.04 | | SGA | 1.00 | 0.68 | 0.84 | 0.55 | 0.45 | 0.89 | | 0.77 | 0.40 | 0.37 | 0.06 | 0.20 | 0.21 | | GAFSI | 1.00 | 0.70 | 0.85 | 0.98 | 0.48 | 0.96 | | 0.57 | 0.23 | 0.92 | 0.85 | 0.75 | 0.68 | | IBAttack | 1.00 | 0.79 | 0.89 | 0.92 | 0.84 | 0.92 | | 0.98 | 0.78 | 0.94 | 0.89 | 0.81 | 0.77 | | HMIA-LLM | 0.88 | 0.80 | 0.77 | 0.81 | 0.64 | 0.79 | | 0.80 | 0.86 | 0.90 | 0.70 | 0.88 | 0.77 | | EAT-GNN | 0.96 | 0.92 | 0.90 | 0.90 | 0.95 | 0.91 | | 0.95 | 0.92 | 0.94 | 0.93 | 0.89 | 0.84 | | 真新闻 | 未受攻击 | 0.04 | 0.10 | 0.12 | 0.10 | 0.14 | 0.13 | | 0.08 | 0.03 | 0.02 | 0.05 | 0.06 | 0.05 | | DICE | 0.30 | 0.18 | 0.15 | 0.11 | 0.17 | 0.26 | | 0.18 | 0.11 | 0.13 | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.07 | | MARL | 0.81 | 0.39 | 0.32 | 0.13 | 0.25 | 0.32 | | 0.75 | 0.22 | 0.35 | 0.08 | 0.16 | 0.18 | | SGA | 0.95 | 0.67 | 0.65 | 0.15 | 0.41 | 0.73 | | 1.00 | 0.48 | 0.85 | 0.12 | 0.44 | 0.52 | | GAFSI | 0.95 | 0.55 | 0.70 | 0.72 | 0.52 | 0.86 | | 1.00 | 0.48 | 0.91 | 0.84 | 0.64 | 0.68 | | IBAttack | 0.96 | 0.86 | 0.92 | 0.78 | 0.93 | 0.86 | | 0.99 | 0.71 | 0.96 | 0.85 | 0.90 | 0.78 | | HMIA-LLM | 0.67 | 0.91 | 0.88 | 0.80 | 0.88 | 0.90 | | 0.93 | 0.75 | 0.89 | 0.64 | 0.74 | 0.78 | | EAT-GNN | 0.98 | 0.98 | 0.96 | 0.83 | 0.97 | 0.95 | | 0.95 | 0.79 | 0.98 | 0.91 | 0.93 | 0.82 |
|
|
|