|
|
|
| Correlated FMEA method of complex system with linguistic vagueness |
| WU Xiao-rong1,2, QIU Le-miao1, ZHANG Shu-you1, SUN Liang-feng1, GUO Chuan-long1 |
1. State Key Laboratory of Fluid Power Transmission and Control, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China;
2. School of Mathematics and Computer Science, Yichun Univerisy, Yichun 336000, China |
|
|
|
Abstract Considering some inherent shortcomings of the conventional failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA), a correlated FMEA method was proposed for reprioritization of interrelated failure modes with linguistic vagueness. The fuzzy linguistic knowledge in an evaluation of failure mode was quantified by fuzzy set theory, and an effective number of each failure mode was obtained with a fuzzy-modified technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS). A digraph of direct relations between failure modes was constructed, and then a matrix of failure influences was gained using decision making trial and evaluation laboratory (DEMATEL) method. The risk evaluation of failure modes in a complex system with linguistic vagueness was completed with obtained causal degree of each failure mode from the matrix of failure influences. The proposed method was applied to safety analysis of the complex centrifugal pump.The results indicated that, compared with the risk priority number (RPN) method and the fuzzy FMEA method, the proposed correlated FMEA method could greatly improve the analysis reliability.
|
|
Published: 01 May 2013
|
|
|
模糊语境下的复杂系统关联FMEA方法
针对传统失效模式及效果分析(FMEA)技术在模糊语境应用中存在的缺陷,提出一种可考虑模糊语境和失效模式关联性的模糊关联FMEA方法.运用模糊集理论量化产品或系统失效评估中的专家经验和语言的模糊信息,通过模糊改进的逼近于理想解排序技术(TOPSIS),得到各种失效模式的影响强度.利用决策试验与评价实验室(DEMATEL)理论,构建失效模式直接影响关联图,获得失效模式综合影响矩阵,计算得到每种失效模式的原因度,开展复杂系统的模糊关联失效风险评估.采用该方法对某离心泵系统进行安全性分析,并与传统风险优先数(RPN)法和模糊FMEA法的分析结果进行比较.结果表明,采用该方法可以提高分析的可靠性．
|
|
| ［1］ 盛江, 刘国青. 空间环境模拟器的FMEA分析方法［J］.航天器环境工程, 2008, 25(4): 395-400.
SHENG Jiang, LIU Guo-qing. The FMEA method in large space environment simulators ［J］. Spacecraft Environment Engineering, 2008, 25(4): 395-400．
［2］ 姚杰, 钟再敏, 孙泽昌, 等. FMEA在燃料电池客车中的应用［J］.机电一体化, 2007, 13(3): 71-73．
YAO Jie, ZHONG Zai-min, SUN Ze-chang, et al. Failure mode effect analysis on fuel cell bus ［J］. Mechatronics, 2007, 13(3): 71-73．
［3］ GUIMARAES A C F, LAPA C M F. Effects analysis fuzzy inference system in nuclear problems using approximate reasoning ［J］. Annals of Nuclear Energy, 2004, 31: 107-115．
［4］ 周俊峰, 许乐平, 竹建福, 等. 故障模式及影响分析方法在船舶主推进系统中的应用［J］. 船海工程, 2006, 35(6): 84-87.
ZHOU Jun-feng, XU Le-ping, ZHU Jian-fu, et al. Application of FMEA in main propulsion system of ship ［J］. Ship & Ocean Engineering, 2006, 35(6): 84-87．
［5］ BOWLES J B, PELAEZ C E. Fuzzy logic prioritization of failures in a system failure modes, effects and criticality analysis ［J］. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 1995, 50(2): 203-213．
［6］ TAY K M, LIM C P. Application of fuzzy inference techniques to FMEA ［J］. Applied Soft Computing Technologies: The Challenge of Complexity, 2006, 34: 161-171．
［7］ PILLAY A, WANG J. Modified failure mode and effects analysis using approximate reasoning ［J］. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2003, 79(1): 69-85．
［8］ WANG J, RUXTON T, LABRIE C R. Design for safety of engineering systems with multiple failure state variables ［J］. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 1995, 50(3): 271-284．
［9］ 门峰. 模糊集理论与灰色关联理论的FMEA方法［J］. 工业工程, 2008,11(4): 109-112．
MEN Feng. FMEA method based upon fuzzy set theory and grey relational theory ［J］. Industrial Engineering Journal, 2008,11(4): 109-112．
［10］ 和媛媛, 周德群, 巩在武. 三角模糊TOPSIS决策方法及其实验分析［J］. 系统工程, 2010, 11: 95-103.
HE Yuan-yuan, ZHOU De-qun, GONG Zai-wu. The triangular fuzzy TOPSIS decision method and experimental analysis ［J］. Systems Engineering, 2010, 11: 95-103．
［11］ 刘华文. 基于距离测度的模糊数排序［J］. 山东大学学报：理学版,2004, 39(2): 3036．
LIU Hua-wen. Ranking fuzzy numbers based on a distance measure ［J］. Journal of Shandong University ：Natural Science, 2004, 39(2): 30-36．
［12］ ASGHARPOUR M J. Group decision making and game theory in operation research ［M］. Tehran: Tehran University Press, 2001:88108．
［13］ SANKAR N R, PRABHU B S. Modified approach for prioritization of failures in a system failure mode and effects analysis ［J］. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 2001, 18(3):324-335．
［14］ KUTLU A C, EKMEKCIOGLU M. Fuzzy failure modes and effects analysis by using fuzzy TOPSIS-based fuzzy AHP ［J］. Expert Systems with Applications, 2011, 7: 1-7． |
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
| |
Shared |
|
|
|
|
| |
Discussed |
|
|
|
|
