Please wait a minute...
浙江大学学报(工学版)
土木与交通工程     
基于改进VIKOR法的进度计划方案选择问题研究
王仁超, 邓剑, 曹婷婷
天津大学 水利工程仿真与安全国家重点实验室,天津 300072
Selection of construction project schedule alternatives based on improved VIKOR method
WANG Ren chao, DENG Jian, CAO Ting ting
State Key Laboratory of Hydraulic Engineering Simulation and Safety, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China
 全文: PDF(604 KB)   HTML
摘要:

针对网络进度计划优化方案多准则群决策问题中专家对评价准则存在偏好的问题,提出基于二元语义信息的VIKOR群决策方法.该方法应用语言变量对各准则进行定性评价,使用二元语义信息对专家对准则的评价进行集结.综合考虑决策者对准则的主观偏好以及评价准则的客观权重来确定综合权重,使准则权重的确定更加合理.结合VIKOR方法,对网络进度计划优化方案进行排序,获得妥协的优化方案;通过工程案例进行计算分析,证明了该方法的实用性和可行性.

Abstract:

A method based on improved VIKOR was proposed in order to solve the decision makers’ preference on evaluation criteria. The method used language variables to qualitatively evaluate various criteria and used the two-tuple linguistic to aggregate experts’ evaluation on criteria. Decision makers’ subjective preference and criteria objective weight were considered to make the criteria’s weight more reasonable. Because the decision maker wants a solution that is the closest to the ideal, the alternatives are evaluated according to all established criteria. The VIKOR method was used to solve the network schedule optimization plans decision making problem, through measuring the distance between the alternatives and the best values to get the compromised result. An example analysis was given to illustrate the effectiveness and practicability of the proposed method.

出版日期: 2016-10-28
:  TU 722  
作者简介: 王仁超(1963—),男,教授,从事大型工程系统分析、项目管理及计算机仿真研究. ORCID: 0000-0003-4331-9620. E-mail:renchao1881@vip.sina.com
服务  
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章  

引用本文:

王仁超, 邓剑, 曹婷婷. 基于改进VIKOR法的进度计划方案选择问题研究[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 10.3785/j.issn.1008-973X.2016.10.025.

WANG Ren chao, DENG Jian, CAO Ting ting. Selection of construction project schedule alternatives based on improved VIKOR method. JOURNAL OF ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY (ENGINEERING SCIENCE), 10.3785/j.issn.1008-973X.2016.10.025.

链接本文:

http://www.zjujournals.com/eng/CN/10.3785/j.issn.1008-973X.2016.10.025        http://www.zjujournals.com/eng/CN/Y2016/V50/I10/2025

[1] 王坚强.信息不完全的Fuzzy群体多准则决策的规划方法[J].系统工程与电子技术,2004, 26(11): 1604-1608.
WANG Jianqiang. Programming method of fuzzy group multiple criteria decision making with incomplete information [J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2004, 26(11): 1604-1608.
[2] WU T, DAN L S, BLACKHURST J, et al. AIDEA: a methodology for supplier evaluation and selection in a supplierbased manufacturing environment [J]. International Journal of Manufacturing Technology and Management, 2007, 11(2): 174-192.
[3] 吴冲,李汉铃.模糊AHP决策方法[J].管理工程学报,2001,15(1): 63-64.
WU Chong, LI Hanling. The decision method of fuzzy AHP [J]. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, 2001, 15(1): 63-64.
[4] DENG Y. Plant location selection based on fuzzy TOPSIS [J]. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2006, 28(7/8): 839-844.
[5] SANAYEI A, MOUSAVI S F, YAZDANKHAH A. Group decision making process for supplier selection with VIKOR under fuzzy environment [J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2010, 37(1): 24-30.
[6] 阮连法,陈佳玲.基于模糊VIKOR方法的绿色建筑供应商选择[J].统计与决策,2011(21): 62-65.
RUAN Lianfa, CHEN Jialing. Green building supplier selection based on fuzzy VIKOR method [J]. Statistics and Decision, 2011(21): 62-65.
[7] SALEHI K. A hybrid fuzzy MCDM approach for project selection problem [J]. Decision Science Letters, 2015,4(1): 109-116.
[8] 田军,张朋柱,王刊良,等.基于德尔菲法的专家意见集成模型研究[J].系统工程理论与实践,2004,24(1): 57-62.
TIAN Jun, ZHANG Pengzhu, WANG Kanliang, et al. The integrating model of expert’s opinion based on Delphi method [J]. System Engineering Theory and Practice, 2004, 24(1): 57-62.
[9] 常建娥,蒋太立.层次分析法确定权重的研究[J].武汉理工大学学报:信息与管理工程版,2007,29(1): 153-156.
CHANG Jiane, JIANG Taili. Research on the weight of coefficient through analytic hierarchy process [J]. Journal of Wuhan University of Technology: Information and Management Engineering, 2007, 29(1): 153-156.
[10] 万俊,邢焕革,张晓晖.基于熵理论的多属性群决策专家权重的调整算法[J].控制与决策,2010, 25(6):907-910.
WAN Jun, XING Huan ge, ZHANG Xiao hui. Algorithm of adjusting weights of decision-makers in multi-attribute group decision-making based on entropy theory [J]. Control and Decision, 2010, 25(6): 907-910.
[11] CHEN Ting yu, LI Chia hang. Determining objective weights with intuitionistic fuzzy entropy measures: a comparative analysis [J]. Information Sciences, 2010, 180(21): 4207-4222.
[12] COOK W D, KRESS M. A multiplecriteria composite index model for quantitative and qualitative data [J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 1994, 78(94): 367-379.
[13] 周荣喜,范福云,何大义,等.多属性群决策中基于数据稳定性与主观偏好的综合熵权法[J].控制与决策,2012,27(8): 1169-1174.
ZHOU Rong xi, FAN Fu yun, HE Da yi, et al. Integrated entropy weight method based on data stability and subjective preference in multiattribute group decision-making [J]. Control and Decision, 2012, 27(8): 1169-1174.
[14] HERRERA F, MARTINEZ L. A 2tuple fuzzy linguistic representation model for computing with words [J]. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 2001, 8(6): 746-752.
[15] OPRICOVIC S. Multicriteria optimization of civil engineering systems [J]. Faculty of Civil Engineering, 1998, 2(1): 521.
[16] OPRICOVIC S, TZENG G H. Multicriteria planning of post-earthquake sustainable reconstruction [J]. Computer Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 2002, 17(3): 211-220.
[17] SANAYEI A, MOUSAVI S F, YAZDANKHAH A. Group decision making process for supplier selection with VIKOR under fuzzy environment [J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2010, 37(1): 24-30.
[18] SALEHI K. A hybrid fuzzy MCDM approach for project selection problem [J]. Decision Science Letters, 2015, 4(1): 109-116.
[19] 萨日娜,张树有.复杂产品设计方案联合变权群决策方法[J].浙江大学学报:工学版,2013, 04(4): 711-719.
SA Rina, ZHANG Shuyou. Conjoint variable weight group decision method for complex product scheme design [J]. Journal of Zhejiang University: Engineering Science, 2013, 04(4): 711-719.
[20] 王强英.三角直觉模糊多属性群决策方法及其在供应商选择中的应用[D].南昌:江西财经大学,2014.
WANG Qiang ying. Triangular intuitionistic fuzzy multiple attribute group decision making method and its application in supplier selection [D]. Nanchang: Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics, 2014.
[21] OPRICOVIC S, TZENG G H. Compromise solution by MCDM methods: a comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS [J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2004, 156(2): 445-455.
[22] RAO R V, PATEL B K, PARNICHKUN M. Industrial robot selection using a novel decision making method considering objective and subjective preferences. rob auton syst [J]. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 2011,59(6): 367-375.
[23] 张丽霞,侍克斌.施工网络进度计划的多目标优化[J].系统工程理论与实践,2003,23(1): 56-61.
ZHANG Li xia, SHI Ke bin. Construction network’s optimization under multi-goal conditions [J]. System Engineering Theory and Practice, 2003, 23(1): 56-61.

No related articles found!