Please wait a minute...
J4  2010, Vol. 44 Issue (2): 358-363+372    DOI: 10.3785/j.issn.1008-973X.2010.02.027
机械工程     
盾构刀盘驱动液压系统效率对比研究
邢彤1,2, 杨华勇1, 龚国芳1
(1. 浙江大学 流体传动及控制国家重点实验室,浙江 杭州 310027;2. 浙江工业大学 机械工程学院,浙江 杭州 310032)
Efficiency comparative study for hydraulic drive system of cutter head in shield tunneling machine
XING Tong1,2, YANG Hua-yong1, GONG Guo-fang1
(1. State Key Laboratory of Fluid Power Transmission and Control, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China;
2. School of Mechanical Engineering, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310032, China)
 全文: PDF  HTML
摘要:

为了提高盾构刀盘驱动液压系统的效率,以6.3 m土压平衡(EPB)盾构和1.8 m模拟盾构为研究对象,提出两种新型盾构刀盘驱动液压系统.对比分析了常用的多泵联合驱动和新提出的多泵组合驱动方式的刀盘驱动液压系统效率,常用的变排量容积调速和新提出的变转速容积调速驱动方式的刀盘驱动液压系统效率.建立了液压泵和液压马达的效率计算模型,采用AMESim软件建立4种液压驱动系统的仿真模型.研究结果表明,在刀盘典型转速下(1.0~2.0 r/min),多泵组合驱动方式比多泵联合驱动方式的刀盘驱动液压系统效率高3%~7%,变转速容积调速方式比变排量容积调速方式的刀盘驱动液压系统效率高4%~26%.

Abstract:

Two novel hydraulic drive systems were proposed by analyzing the 6.3 m earth pressure balance (EPB) shield machine and the 1.8 m test shield machine in order to improve the efficiency. The efficiency under the multi-variable pumps joint mode was contrasted with the multi-variable pumps built-up mode, and the variable displacement pump control mode was contrasted with the variable rotate speed pump control mode. The efficiency calculation models of the hydraulic pump and hydraulic motor were conducted, and the simulation models of the four hydraulic systems were conducted by AMESim soft. The efficiency of the multi-variable pumps built-up mode is higher than the multi-variable pumps joint mode about 3%-7% and the efficiency of the variable rotate speed pump control mode is higher than the variable displacement pump control mode about 4%-26% at the typical rotate speed of 1.0-2.0 r/min.

出版日期: 2010-03-09
:  TH 137  
基金资助:

国家杰出青年基金资助项目(50425518);国家“973”重点基础研究发展计划资助项目 (2007CB714004).

通讯作者: 龚国芳,男,教授,博导.     E-mail: Gfgong@sfp.zju.edu.cn
作者简介: 邢彤(1969—),男,吉林长春人,副教授,从事机电系统研究.
服务  
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章  

引用本文:

邢彤, 杨华勇, 龚国芳. 盾构刀盘驱动液压系统效率对比研究[J]. J4, 2010, 44(2): 358-363+372.

GENG Tong, YANG Hua-Yong, GONG Guo-Fang. Efficiency comparative study for hydraulic drive system of cutter head in shield tunneling machine. J4, 2010, 44(2): 358-363+372.

链接本文:

http://www.zjujournals.com/eng/CN/10.3785/j.issn.1008-973X.2010.02.027        http://www.zjujournals.com/eng/CN/Y2010/V44/I2/358

[1]  江木正夫,箫欣志.日本液压技术动向[J].液压气动与密封, 2004(1): 1114.
江木正夫,XIAO Xin-zhi. The trend of Japan’s hydraulic technology [J]. Hydraulics and Pneumatics and Seal, 2004(1): 1114.[2] 蔡河山.土压平衡盾构液压传动控制系统浅析:刀盘驱动液压传动控制系统[J].液压与气动,2003(8): 3031.
CAI He-shan. Earth-pressure-balance shield hydraulic drive and control system analysis: cut-disk drive hydraulic system [J]. Hydraulics and Pneumatics, 2003(8): 3031.
[3] TAMAKI S. Hydraulic device of shield excavating machine: U.S., 2737560[P]. \
[20010116\].
[4] 韩亚丽.土压平衡盾构刀盘驱动液压系统的组成[J].工程机械与维修,2003(4): 9294.
HAN Ya-li. Constitute of the hydraulic system of cutter head in EPB shield machine[J]. Construction Machinery and Maintenance, 2003(4): 9294.
[5] 彭天好,杨华勇,付新.盾构掘进机动力系统的节能研究[J].矿山机械,2000,28(12): 2125.
PENG Tian-hao, YANG Hua-yong, FU Xin. Research into the energy saving of the shield tunneling machine drive system[J]. Mining and Processing Equipment, 2000, 28(12): 2125.
[6] 乐贵平.浅谈北京地铁施工用盾构机选型[J].现代隧道技术,2003(3): 1430.
LE Gui-ping. Selection of shield machines for Beijing metro construction [J]. Modern Tunnelling Technology, 2003(3): 1430.

[1] 丁川,丁凡,周星,满在朋,杨灿军. 新型耐压湿式比例电磁铁的研制与对比试验研究[J]. J4, 2014, 48(3): 451-455.
[2] 宋月超, 徐兵, 杨华勇, 张军辉. 改进的柱塞泵流量脉动“实用近似”测试法[J]. J4, 2014, 48(2): 200-205.
[3] 满在朋,丁凡,丁川,刘硕,黄挺峰. 液压软管脉冲试验的发展与研究综述[J]. J4, 2014, 48(1): 21-28.
[4] 施虎, 杨华勇, 龚国芳, 侯典清. 盾构推进液压系统载荷顺应性指标和评价方法[J]. J4, 2013, 47(8): 1444-1449.
[5] 侯典清,龚国芳,施虎,王林涛. 基于顺应特性的新型盾构推进系统设计[J]. J4, 2013, 47(7): 1287-1292.
[6] 魏建华,国凯,熊义. 大型装备多轴电液执行器同步控制[J]. J4, 2013, 47(5): 755-760.
[7] 施虎,杨华勇,龚国芳,王林涛. 盾构掘进机关键技术及模拟试验台现状与展望[J]. J4, 2013, 47(5): 741-749.
[8] 侯典清, 龚国芳, 施虎, 王林涛. 盾构推进系统突变载荷顺应特性研究[J]. J4, 2013, 47(3): 522-527.
[9] 朱旭, 魏建华, 方锦辉. 先导式电液配流系统的动态特性[J]. J4, 2013, 47(2): 193-200.
[10] 张彦廷, 渠迎锋, 刘振东, 马江涛. 天车升沉补偿系统摇摆装置的设计[J]. J4, 2012, 46(12): 2268-2273.
[11] 方锦辉, 魏建华, 孔晓武. 并联伺服阀的同步控制策略[J]. J4, 2012, 46(6): 1054-1059.
[12] 杜恒, 魏建华, 冯瑞琳. 压力跟踪阀建模、仿真与试验研究[J]. J4, 2012, 46(6): 1034-1040.
[13] 满军, 丁凡, 李其朋, 笪靖, 邵森寅. 永磁屏蔽式耐高压高速开关电磁铁[J]. J4, 2012, 46(2): 309-314.
[14] 管成,徐晓,林潇,王守洪. 液压挖掘机回转制动能量回收系统[J]. J4, 2012, 46(1): 142-149.
[15] 黄家海,邱敏秀,方文敏. 液黏调速离合器中摩擦副间隙内流体传热分析[J]. J4, 2011, 45(11): 1934-1940.