Please wait a minute...
Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE B (Biomedicine & Biotechnology)  2015, Vol. 16 Issue (7): 573-579    DOI: 10.1631/jzus.B1400257
Articles     
Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy for benign or premalignant pancreatic neoplasms: a two-center comparative study
Jia-fei Yan, Tian-tao Kuang, Da-yong Ji, Xiao-wu Xu, Dan-song Wang, Ren-chao Zhang, Wei-wei Jin, Yi-ping Mou, Wen-hui Lou
Department of General Surgery, Institute of Micro-Invasive Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310016, China; Department of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
Download:     PDF (0 KB)     
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      

Abstract  Objective: To compare the peri-operative outcomes for laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP) and open distal pancreatectomy (ODP) for benign or premalignant pancreatic neoplasms in two institutions. Methods: This prospective comparative study included 91 consecutive patients who underwent LDP (n=45) or ODP (n=46) from Jan. 2010 to Dec. 2012. Demographics, intra-operative characteristics, and post-operative outcomes were compared. Results: The median operating time in the LDP group was (158.7±38.3) min compared with (92.2±24.1) min in the ODP group (P<0.001). Patients had lower blood loss in LDP than in the ODP ((122.6±61.1) ml vs. (203.1±84.8) ml, P<0.001). The rates of splenic conservation between the LDP and ODP groups were similar (53.3% vs. 47.8%, P=0.35). All spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomies were conducted with vessel preservation. LDP also demonstrated better post-operative outcomes. The time to oral intake and normal daily activities was faster in the LDP group than in the ODP group ((1.6±0.5) d vs. (3.2±0.7) d, P<0.01; (1.8±0.4) d vs. (2.1±0.6) d, P=0.02, respectively), and the post-operative length of hospital stay in LDP was shorter than that in ODP ((7.9±3.8) d vs. (11.9±5.8) d, P=0.006). No difference in tumor size ((4.7±3.2) cm vs. (4.5±1.8) cm, P=0.77) or overall pancreatic fistula rate (15.6% vs. 19.6%, P=0.62) was found between the groups, while the overall post-operative complication rate was lower in the LDP group (26.7% vs. 47.8%, P=0.04). Conclusions: LDP is safe and effective for benign or premalignant pancreatic neoplasms, featuring lower blood loss and substantially faster recovery.

Key wordsLaparoscopy      Distal pancreatic resection      Pancreatic neoplasm      Splenic preservation      Pancreatic benign tumors     
Received: 25 September 2014      Published: 03 July 2015
CLC:  R735.9  
Cite this article:

Jia-fei Yan, Tian-tao Kuang, Da-yong Ji, Xiao-wu Xu, Dan-song Wang, Ren-chao Zhang, Wei-wei Jin, Yi-ping Mou, Wen-hui Lou. Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy for benign or premalignant pancreatic neoplasms: a two-center comparative study. Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE B (Biomedicine & Biotechnology), 2015, 16(7): 573-579.

URL:

http://www.zjujournals.com/xueshu/zjus-b/10.1631/jzus.B1400257     OR     http://www.zjujournals.com/xueshu/zjus-b/Y2015/V16/I7/573

[1] Yue WANG, Heng CUI, Yan ZHAO, Zhi-qi WANG. Gasless laparoscopy for benign gynecological diseases using an abdominal wall-lifting system[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE B (Biomedicine & Biotechnology), 2009, 10(11): 805-812.