Please wait a minute...
Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE B (Biomedicine & Biotechnology)  2007, Vol. 8 Issue (8): 604-608    DOI: 10.1631/jzus.2007.B0604
Biomedicine     
Crossover randomized controlled trial of the electronic version of the Chinese SF-36
CHEN Tian-hui, LI Lu, SIGLE Joerg M., DU Ya-ping, WANG Hong-mei, LEI Jun
Institute of Social Medicine and Family Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China; Department of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University of Goettingen, Goettingen 37073, Germany; Scientific IT Consulting, Duderstadt 37115, Germany; Institute for Informatics, University of Goettingen, Goettingen 37083, Germany
Download:     PDF (0 KB)     
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      

Abstract  Objectives: to verify the feasibility and reliability of the electronic version of Chinese SF-36 based on the Quality-of-Life-Recorder. Design: A crossover randomized controlled trial, comparing a paper-based and an electronic version of the Chinese SF-36, was conducted. According to generated random numbers, interviewees were asked to fill out either the electronic version or the paper version first. The second version was filled in after a pause of at least 10 min. Settings and participants: One group of 100 medical students at the School of Medicine of Zhejiang University and the other group of 50 outpatients at a clinic for general practice in Hangzhou City (China) were eventually recruited in this study. Results: The acceptance of the electronic version was good (60% of medical students and 84% of outpatients preferred the electronic version). At the level of eight-scale scores, the mean-difference for each scale (except for general health) between the two versions was less than 5%. At the level of 36 questions, the percentage of “exact agreement” ranged within 64%~99%; the percentage of “global agreement” ranged within 72%~99%; 77% of the kappa coefficients demonstrated “good/excellent agreement” and 23% of the kappa coefficients demonstrated “medium agreement”. Conclusion: This study, for the first time, can provide empirical basis for the confirmation of the feasibility and reliability of the electronic version of the Chinese SF-36 and may provide an impulse towards widespread deployment of the Quality-of-Life-Recorder in Chinese populations.

Key wordsHealth-related quality of life (HRQoL)      SF-36      Electronic questionnaire      Computer based testing      General practice      Randomized control trial      Feasibility      Reliability     
Received: 29 January 2007     
CLC:  R395  
Cite this article:

CHEN Tian-hui, LI Lu, SIGLE Joerg M., DU Ya-ping, WANG Hong-mei, LEI Jun. Crossover randomized controlled trial of the electronic version of the Chinese SF-36. Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE B (Biomedicine & Biotechnology), 2007, 8(8): 604-608.

URL:

http://www.zjujournals.com/xueshu/zjus-b/10.1631/jzus.2007.B0604     OR     http://www.zjujournals.com/xueshu/zjus-b/Y2007/V8/I8/604

[1] Wei Luo, Xiao-hong Gui, Bo Wang, Wen-ying Zhang, Zhi-yuan Ouyang, Yi Guo, Bao-rong Zhang, Mei-ping Ding. Validity and reliability testing of the Chinese (mainland) version of the 39-item Parkinson’s Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39)[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE B (Biomedicine & Biotechnology), 2010, 11(7): 531-538.
[2] Jie ZHONG, Chun WANG, Jie LI, Jun LIU. Penn State Worry Questionnaire: structure and psychometric properties of the Chinese version[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE B (Biomedicine & Biotechnology), 2009, 10(3): 211-218.
[3] CHEN Tian-hui, LI Lu, KOCHEN Michael M.. A systematic review: How to choose appropriate health-related quality of life (HRQOL) measures in routine general practice?[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE B (Biomedicine & Biotechnology), 2005, 6(9): 936-940.