|
|
|
| A Study of Labor Cost and Total Factor Productivity against the Background of Population Aging: Based on the Perspective of Enterprise Ownership Type |
| Xue Tianhang1, Xiao Wen2, Tang Nan3 |
1.Research Center for Regional Coordinated Development, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058,China
2.School of Economics, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China
3.School of Finance, Shanghai University of Finance and Economics, Shanghai 200433, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract With the aggravation of aging, labor cost in China shows an increasing trend. It is the way to cope with the rising cost by promoting the growth of total factor productivity (TFP). Currently, the studies on rising labor cost and TFP focus on qualitative analysis and impact mechanism but seldom involve heterogeneity. However, the heterogeneity of enterprises in financing and other aspects may make it difficult for some enterprises to cope with the impact of rising labor cost, which not only restricts the role of market competition mechanism but also is not conducive to the long-term healthy development of economy in China. Based on this, this paper studies the difference influence of rising labor cost on TFP of different ownership enterprises from the perspective of heterogeneous ownership types and the economic consequences produced by the difference influence.The main contents are as follows (1) The differences in financing ability and policy burden between state-owned enterprises and private enterprises are analyzed theoretically. On the one hand, private enterprises rely more on labor input, and rising labor cost has resulted in a substantial increase in the burden on private enterprises; on the other hand, state-owned enterprises also bear policy burdens such as “stabilizing employment”, and their negative effects on TFP of state-owned enterprises may be further amplified due to rising labor cost. According to this hypothesis, rising labor cost has a more positive effect on TFP of state-owned enterprises (private enterprises). (2) The differences in investment motivation between domestic and foreign-funded enterprises are analyzed theoretically. On the one hand, the technical efficiency level of foreign-funded enterprises is higher, and it is more difficult to improve TFP marginal; on the other hand, it is easier for foreign-funded enterprises to transfer production capacity to countries with lower costs, instead of responding by improving efficiency. Based on this, this paper puts forward a hypothesis that rising labor cost has a more positive effect on TFP of domestic-funded enterprises. (3) Empirical tests are carried out for theoretical analysis. Based on FE model, TFP measured by ACF method is used for regression analysis, and robustness test is carried out by changing regression dependent variables and using GMM regression method. The empirical results are consistent with theoretical hypothesis. The following conclusions are obtained First of all, rising labor cost significantly promotes the TFP of enterprises, and the impact on TFP of enterprises with different ownership types is unbalanced. Secondly, compared with private and foreign-funded enterprises, rising labor cost has a more positive effect on TFP in state-owned enterprises. In capital-intensive industries and areas with low degree of marketization, this unbalanced effect is further expanded. Thirdly, rising labor cost weakens the TFP competitive advantage of private and foreign-funded enterprises, which results in the decline of the market share of private enterprises and foreign-funded enterprises. Therefore, it is helpful to promote the TFP of private and foreign-funded enterprises and maintain the stability of their market share by improving the degree of regional marketization. Innovations First of all, the theoretical framework of rising labor cost and TFP changes of enterprises is constructed from the perspective of ownership heterogeneity, and the heterogeneous influence mechanism of rising labor cost on state-owned enterprises and private enterprises, domestic-funded enterprises and foreign-funded enterprises is put forward to expand and supplement the existing literature. Secondly, by constructing a grouping regression model and other ways to carry out empirical tests, this paper clarifies the heterogeneous influence of rising labor cost on enterprises with different ownership systems and the economic consequences of this heterogeneous influence, which provides theoretical reference for comprehensively grasping the changing characteristics of total factor productivity of enterprises with different ownership systems during the period of population transition.
|
|
Received: 21 February 2023
|
|
|
|
1 黄先海、徐圣： 《中国劳动收入比重下降成因分析——基于劳动节约型技术进步的视角》，《经济研究》2009年第7期，第34-44页。
2 林炜： 《企业创新激励：来自中国劳动力成本上升的解释》，《管理世界》2013年第10期，第95-105页。
3 蔡昉： 《刘易斯转折点——中国经济发展阶段的标识性变化》，《经济研究》2022年第1期，第16-22页。
4 程文、张建华： 《收入水平、收入差距与自主创新——兼论“中等收入陷阱”的形成与跨越》，《经济研究》2018年第4期，第47-62页。
5 刘晓光、刘嘉桐： 《劳动力成本与中小企业融资约束》，《金融研究》2020年第9期，第117-135页。
6 刘瑞明： 《金融压抑、所有制歧视与增长拖累——国有企业效率损失再考察》，《经济学（季刊）》2011年第10期，第603-618页。
7 何瑛、杨琳： 《改革开放以来国有企业混合所有制改革：历程、成效与展望》，《管理世界》2021年第7期，第44-60页。
8 Melitz M. J.， “The impact of trade on intra-industry reallocations and aggregate industry productivity，” Econometrica， Vol. 71， No. 6 （2003）， pp. 1695-1725.
9 Dowyer G. P.， Tamura R. & Baier S. L.， “How important are capital and total factor productivity for economic growth，” Economic Inquiry， Vol. 44， No. 1 （2010）， pp. 23-49.
10 Hsieh C. T. & Klenow P. J.， “Misallocation and manufacturing TFP in China and India，” The Quarterly Journal of Economics， Vol. 124， No. 4 （2009）， pp. 1403-1448.
11 陈梦根、张鑫： 《中国数字经济规模测度与生产率分析》，《数量经济技术经济研究》2022年第1期，第3-27页。
12 黄勃、李海彤、江萍等： 《战略联盟、要素流动与企业全要素生产率提升》，《管理世界》2022年第10期，第195-212页。
13 姚先国、曾国华： 《劳动力成本对地区劳动生产率的影响研究》，《浙江大学学报（人文社会科学版）》2012年第5期，第135-143页。
14 程晨、王萌萌： 《企业劳动力成本与全要素生产率——倒逼机制的考察》，《南开经济研究》2016年第3期，第118-132页。
15 邓明： 《劳动力成本上升是否引致了企业所得税实际税率的变动》，《财贸经济》2022年第8期，第88-104页。
16 魏志华、夏太彪： 《社会保险缴费负担、财务压力与企业避税》，《中国工业经济》2020年第7期，第136-154页。
17 宁光杰、张雪凯： 《劳动力流转与资本深化——当前中国企业机器替代劳动的新解释》，《中国工业经济》2021年第6期，第42-60页。
18 蒲艳萍、顾冉： 《劳动力工资扭曲如何影响企业创新》，《中国工业经济》2019年第7期，第137-154页。
19 Lin C.， Ma Y. & Xuan Y.， “Ownership structure and financial constraints： evidence from a structural estimation，” Journal of Financial Economics， Vol. 102， No. 2 （2011）， pp. 416-431.
20 邓可斌、曾海舰： 《中国企业的融资约束：特征现象与成因检验》，《经济研究》2014年第2期，第47-60页。
21 申广军、姚洋、钟宁桦： 《民营企业融资难与我国劳动力市场的结构性问题》，《管理世界》2020年第2期，第41-58页。
22 林毅夫、李志赟： 《政策性负担、道德风险与预算软约束》，《经济研究》2004年第2期，第17-27页。
23 廖冠民、沈红波： 《国有企业的政策性负担：动因、后果及治理》，《中国工业经济》2014年第6期，第96-108页。
24 陈冬华、范从来、沈永建等： 《职工激励、工资刚性与企业绩效——基于国有非上市公司的经验证据》，《经济研究》2010年第7期，第116-129页。
25 Dunning J. H.， “The eclectic （OLI） paradigm of international production： past， present and future，” International Journal of the Economics of Business， Vol. 8， No. 2 （2001）， pp. 173-190.
26 马双、赖漫桐： 《劳动力成本外生上涨与FDI进入：基于最低工资视角》，《中国工业经济》2020年第6期，第81-99页。
27 Ackerberg D. A.， Caves K. & Frazer G.， “Identification properties of recent production function estimators，” Econometrica， Vol. 83， No. 6 （2015）， pp. 2411-2451.
28 杨汝岱： 《中国制造业企业全要素生产率研究》，《经济研究》2015年第2期，第61-74页。
29 王小鲁、胡李鹏、樊纲： 《中国分省份市场化指数报告（2021）》，北京：社会科学文献出版社，2021年。
30 余淼杰、王霄彤： 《中国—东盟自由贸易协定和中国企业生产率》，《学术月刊》2021年第3期，第50-62页。
31 黄先海、金泽成、余林徽： 《要素流动与全要素生产率增长：来自国有部门改革的经验证据》，《经济研究》2017年第12期，第125-146页。
32 肖文、薛天航： 《劳动力成本上升、融资约束与企业全要素生产率变动》，《世界经济》2019年第1期，第76-94页。
33 Fisman R. & Svensson J.， “Are corruption and taxation really harmful to growth？ firm level evidence，” Journal of Development Economics， Vol. 83， No. 1 （2007）， pp. 63-75.
34 吴延兵： 《中国哪种所有制类型企业最具创新性》，《世界经济》2012年第6期，第3-25页。
35 洪银兴： 《实现要素市场化配置的改革》，《经济学家》2020年第2期，第5-14页。
36 Chen K. & Song Z.， “Financial frictions on capital allocation： a transmission mechanism of TFP fluctuations，” Journal of Monetary Economics， Vol. 60， No. 6 （2013）， pp. 683-703.
37 盛丹、王永进： 《中国企业低价出口之谜——基于企业加成率的视角》，《管理世界》2012年第5期，第8-23页。 |
|
|
|
2023, Vol. 53 
