|
|
|
| From Leaping Capital to Surpassing Capital: The Logical Evolution of Modernization with Chinese Characteristics |
| Fu Qingsong |
| School of Marxism, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract On the basis of the consensus of the current academic community that “the Western modernization that interacts with capital destroyed other modernity sprouts in the 18th Century and dominated the pattern of modern civilization, and that China’s modernization is in the effect of Western colonial modernization in its origin”, this article firmly holds the clue of the relationship with capital, and goes into the depth of history to capture the transition of the characteristics of Chinese modernization. From the perspective of historical genesis, social development and the nature of socialism, it argues that the logical changes of China’s modernization are summed up as a historical process of “leaping over the institutionalized capital (capitalism), occupying and utilizing the capital and its relationship as a tool for managing the world and helping the people, and transcending the capital itself”.For the first time in the academic circle, this article puts forward the “formal subordination” and “substantive subordination” of the relationship with capital to distinguish and describe the different types of the relationship with capital between China and the West. It is argued that the socialist society with Chinese characteristics is a formal subordination to capital, while the Western capitalist society is a substantive subordination to capital. This article puts forward the “leaping logic” and “occupying logic” of capital in the process of modernization with Chinese characteristics, and expounds the historical transformation and dialectical relationship between the two in combination with the shift of the focus of China’s practice in the period of socialist revolution, socialist construction and socialist reform. It is the first time to put forward and preliminarily demonstrate the academic proposition of “how the CPC controls the capital as a social relationship in essence”. It is believed that the key to answering this question in theory, in terms of text, history, reality and reasoning, lies in how to treat Capital, and how the CPC controls the capital as a social relationship in practice. For the purpose of discussion, this article creates academic discourses such as “non-classical socialist revolution”, “a question from colony”, “the Kafting Gorge of the productive forces”, “zero-sum view of Powerful Nation”, “the doctrine of Powerful Nation”.The new ideas put forward in this article are mainly as follows based on the “love and hate” mentality of the Chinese elites towards the Western-style modernization at the beginning of the exploration of the modernization road, it is proposed that the gunfire of the Russian Revolution not only sent Marxism to China, but also was invited by the Chinese elites in the long-term hard search. On the issue of the basic political premise of the modernization of forging the nation-state by revolution, the author puts forward the view that the new revolutionary road of encircling the cities from the countryside makes China’s modernization not only different from the capitalist West, but also different from the socialist Russia at the beginning. It proposes that the socialist market economy with Chinese characteristics, which is served as the road to modernization and prosperity, liberates the understanding of market economy and planned economy from the sense of “essence” and positions it on the sense of “tool”. This kind of understanding is not only different from the Soviet view of planned economy that is anti-capital, but also different from the Western view of market economy that is capital-worship. Based on the expression of the “two wonderful achievements”, it is proposed that China’s “political miracle” supports the “two wonderful achievements”. In terms of research methods, this article adopts a combination of vertical combing and horizontal comparison as a whole, and adopts in-depth reading and the method of “from abstract to concrete” in the analysis of Marx’s “capital as a general” in China.
|
|
Received: 17 April 2022
|
|
|
|
1 张明： 《新时代中国特色社会主义与中国现代性的当代重构》，《内蒙古社会科学（汉文版）》2018年第6期，第1-6页。
2 吴晓明： 《当代中国的精神建设及其思想资源》，《中国社会科学》2012年第5期，第4-20页。
3 吴晓明： 《论马克思对现代性的双重批判》，《学术月刊》2006年第2期，第46-52页。
4 毛泽东： 《论人民民主》，见《毛泽东选集》第4卷，北京：人民出版社，1991年，第1468-1482页。
5 张明： 《中国现代性的复调式语境与原初特征》，《学术研究》2019年第11期，第32-38页。
6 德］恩格斯： 《致卡尔·考茨基》，见中共中央马克思恩格斯列宁斯大林著作编译局编译： 《马克思恩格斯文集》第10卷，北京：人民出版社，2009年，第471-474页。
7 吴晓明： 《马克思主义中国化与新文明类型的可能性》，《哲学研究》2019年第7期，第3-10页。
8 毛泽东： 《同工商界人士的谈话》，见中共中央文献研究室编： 《毛泽东文集》第7卷，北京：人民出版社，1999年，第174-183页。
9 毛泽东： 《可以消灭了资本主义，又搞资本主义》，见中共中央文献研究室、中央档案馆《党的文献》编辑部编： 《共和国走过的路——建国以来重要文献专题选集（1953—1956）》，北京：中央文献出版社，1991年，第308-309页。
10 辛鸣： 《中国道路的实践辩证法》，《哲学研究》2019年第8期，第3-13页。
11 德］马克思： 《各种收入及其源泉》，见中共中央马克思恩格斯列宁斯大林著作编译局编译： 《马克思恩格斯全集》第46卷，北京：人民出版社，2003年，第921-1028页。
12 德］恩格斯： 《致康拉德·施米特》，见中共中央马克思恩格斯列宁斯大林著作编译局编译： 《马克思恩格斯选集》第4卷，北京：人民出版社，2012年，第607-614页。
13 德］马克思： 《给〈祖国纪事〉杂志编辑部的信》，见中共中央马克思恩格斯列宁斯大林著作编译局编译： 《马克思恩格斯选集》第3卷，北京：人民出版社，2012年，第727-731页。
14 郑永年： 《国际发展格局中的中国模式》，《中国社会科学》2009年第5期，第20-28页。
15 Dirlik A. & Meisner M.， Marxism and the Chinese Experience： Issues in Contemporary Chinese Socialism， New York： M. E. Sharpe， 1989.
16 陈学明： 《中国如何“强起来”——从马克思主义现代性批判理论角度的分析》，《学习与探索》2018年第7期，第9-17页。
17 胡大平： 《人的现代化与全面建设社会主义现代化国家》，《思想理论教育导刊》2021年第2期，第69-74页。
18 潘于旭： 《“地瓜理论”中的“块茎”思想和“人类命运共同体”的内在逻辑》，《浙江社会科学》2018年第2期，第28-34页。
19 吴晓明： 《“中国方案”开启全球治理的新文明类型》，《中国社会科学》2017年第10期，第5-16页。
20 习近平： 《决胜全面建成小康社会 夺取新时代中国特色社会主义伟大胜利》，北京：人民出版社，2017年。 |
|
|
|
2023, Vol. 53 
