Please wait a minute...
浙江大学学报(理学版)  2020, Vol. 47 Issue (1): 1-11    DOI: 10.3785/j.issn.1008-9497.2020.01.001
人工智能与可视计算     
在线社交网络控制实验的现状与展望
金诚1,2,3, 江婷君1, 闵勇1, 金小刚3, 葛滢4, 常杰4
1.浙江工业大学 计算机科学与技术学院,浙江杭州 310023
2.腾讯科技(深圳)有限公司,广东深圳 518057
3.浙江大学 计算机科学与技术学院,浙江杭州 310027
4.浙江大学 生命科学学院,浙江杭州 310058
Review of control experiments on online social networks
JIN Cheng1,2,3, JIANG Tingjun1, MIN Yong1, JIN Xiaogang3, GE Ying4, CHANG Jie4
1.College of Computer Science and Technology, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310023, China
2.IEG, Tencent Company, Shenzhen 518057,Guangdong Province, China
3.College of Computer Science and Technology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China
4.College of Life Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China
 全文: PDF(1061 KB)   HTML  
摘要: 在线社交网络已发展成为一个独特的电子生态系统,其应用深刻影响着人们生活的方方面面。由于在线社交网络特性复杂,分析在线社交网络形成和变化中的规律成为当前计算机科学、社会学和物理学的一项挑战。传统上,在线社交网络实证研究主要采用计算机辅助的被动数据获取和分析方式。近年来,在真实大规模在线社交网络上直接进行控制实验从而主动获取数据并开展分析研究的方式广受关注。评述了这一领域的研究进展,包括:社交网络控制实验的主要研究模式;控制实验方法在社交网络结构、信息传播、行为和心理学等领域取得的主要成果以及主要实验工具的适用条件和局限性。最后,展望了人工智能技术在社交网络控制实验中的应用潜力,分析了智能算法对降低实验成本和提高实验效率的作用。
关键词: 社交网络分析计算社会学控制实验网络动力学人工智能    
Abstract: Online social networks have evolved into a unique electronic ecosystem whose applications have profoundly affected all aspects of people‘s lives. Due to the high level of complexity, the formation and changing laws of online social networks have become a challenge in current computer science, sociology, and physics. Traditionally, empirical research on online social networks has mainly adopted passive data acquisition and analysis. In recent years, a research that directly conducts control experiments on large-scale online social networks to actively acquire data has received extensive attention. This paper reviews the research progress in this field, including the main research modes of social network control experiments; main results of control experiment methods in some fields, including network structure, information diffusion, human behavior and psychology; and the conditions and limitations of current experimental methods. Finally, we prospect to the potential application of artificial intelligence techniques in control experiments, as well as the role of intelligent algorithms in reducing the cost and enhancing the effect of control experiments. This work provides a theoretical basis and enlightenment for expanding the application of control experiments in social network analysis.
Key words: social network analysis    computational social science    control experiments    network dynamics    artificial intelligence
收稿日期: 2018-12-03 出版日期: 2020-01-25
CLC:  TP 393.09  
基金资助: 国家自然科学基金资助项目(71303217, 61379074);浙江省自然科学基金资助项目(LY17G030030, LGF18D010001, LGF18D010002).
通讯作者: ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9387-3921,E-mail:myong@zjut.edu.cn.   
作者简介: 金诚(1990—),ORCID:https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2535-4422,男,博士研究生,主要从事网络科学研究.
服务  
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章  
金诚
江婷君
闵勇
金小刚
葛滢
常杰

引用本文:

金诚, 江婷君, 闵勇, 金小刚, 葛滢, 常杰. 在线社交网络控制实验的现状与展望[J]. 浙江大学学报(理学版), 2020, 47(1): 1-11.

JIN Cheng, JIANG Tingjun, MIN Yong, JIN Xiaogang, GE Ying, CHANG Jie. Review of control experiments on online social networks. Journal of Zhejiang University (Science Edition), 2020, 47(1): 1-11.

链接本文:

https://www.zjujournals.com/sci/CN/10.3785/j.issn.1008-9497.2020.01.001        https://www.zjujournals.com/sci/CN/Y2020/V47/I1/1

1 KIM J , HASTAK M . Social network analysis: Characteristics of online social networks after a disaster[J]. International Journal of Information Management, 2018, 38(1): 86-96.DOI:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2017.08.003
2 QUATTROCIOCCHI W , CARDARELLI G , SCALA A . Opinion dynamics on interacting networks: Media competition and social influence[J]. Scientific Reports, 2014, 4: 4938.DOI:10.1038/srep04938
3 CENTOLA D . The spread of behavior in an online social network experiment[J]. Science, 2010, 329(5996): 1194-1197. DOI:10.1126/science.1185231
4 ZUBER F . Spread of unethical behavior in organizations: A dynamic social network perspective[J]. Journal of Business Ethics, 2015, 131(1): 151-172. DOI:10.1007/s10551-014-2270-0
5 JIA P , MIRTABATABAEI A , FRIEDKIN N E , et al . Opinion dynamics and the evolution of social power in influence networks[J]. Siam Review, 2015, 57(3): 367-397. DOI:10.1137/130913250
6 PHAN T Q , AIROLDI E M . A natural experiment of social network formation and dynamics[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2015, 112(21): 6595-6600. DOI:10.1073/pnas.1404770112
7 LAZER D M J , BAUM M A , BENKLER Y , et al . The science of fake news[J]. Science, 2018, 359(6380): 1094-1096. DOI:10.1126/science.aao2998
8 KWAK H , LEE C, PARK H , et al. What is Twitter , a social network or news media?[C]//Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on World Wide Web. Raleigh: ACM, 2010: 591-600.
9 毛佳昕,刘奕群,张敏,等 . 基于用户行为的微博用户社会影响力分析[J]. 计算机学报,2014,37(4):791-800. MAO J X , LIU Y Q , ZHANG M , et al . Social influence analysis for Micro-Blog user based on user behavior[J]. Chinese Journal of Computers, 2014, 37(4):791-800.
10 QIU J Z , LI Y X , TANG J , et al . The lifecycle and cascade of wechat social messaging groups[C]//Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on World Wide Web. Montreal: ACM, 2016: 311-320. DOI:10.1145/2872427.2882979
11 SCHMIDT A L , ZOLLO F , VICARIO M D , et al . Anatomy of news consumption on Facebook[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2017, 114(12): 3035-3039. DOI:10.1073/pnas.1617052114
12 FREEMAN L C . The Development of Social Network Analysis: A Study in the Sociology of Science[M]. Vancouver: Empirical Press, 2004.DOI:10.1177/009430610803700308
13 KRUMM J , DAVIES N , NARAYANASWAMI C . User-generated content[J]. IEEE Pervasive Computing, 2008, 7(4): 10-11.
14 BUETTNER R . Getting a job via career-oriented social networking markets[J]. Electronic Markets, 2017, 27(4): 371-385.DOI:10.1007/s12525-017-0248-3
15 ARAL S , WALKER D . Tie strength, embeddedness, and social influence: A large-scale networked experiment[J]. Management Science, 2014, 60(6): 1352-1370.DOI:10.1287/mnsc.2014.1936
16 BUETTNER R , BUETTNER K . A systematic literature review of twitter research from a socio-political revolution perspective[C]//2016 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS). Koloa: IEEE, 2016: 2206-2215. DOI:10.1109/HICSS.2016.277
17 MIRITELLO G , LARA R , CEBRIAN M , et al . Limited communication capacity unveils strategies for human interaction[J]. Scientific Reports, 2013, 3: 1950. DOI:10.1038/srep01950
18 LAZER D , PENTLAND A , ADAMIC L , et al . Computational social science[J]. Science, 2009, 323(5915): 721-723.
19 VOSOUGHI S , ROY D, ARAL S . The spread of true and false news online[J]. Science, 2018, 359(6380): 1146-1151. DOI:10.1126/science.aap9559
20 INGRAM D . Facebook says data leak hits 87 million users, widening privacy scandal [N/OL]. Reuters, 2018. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-facebook-privacy/facebook-to-revise-terms-of-service-to-include -more-privacy-language-idUSKCN1HB2CM.
21 BAKSHY E , MESSING S , ADAMIC L A . Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on Facebook[J]. Science, 2015, 348(6239): 1130-1132.DOI:10.1126/science.aaa1160
22 BLUME L E , DURLAUF S N . The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics[M]. 2nd ed.Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008.
23 CHEN Y B , WANG Q , XIE J H . Online social interactions: A natural experiment on word of mouth versus observational learning[J]. Journal of Marketing Research, 2011, 48(2): 238-254.DOI:10.2139/ssrn.1501843
24 ROBERT M D , CHARISTOPHER J F , JASON J J , et al . A 61-million-person experiment in social influence and political mobilization[J]. Nature, 2012, 489(7415): 295-298. DOI:10.1038/nature11421
25 CENTOLA D . An experimental study of homophily in the adoption of health behavior[J]. Science, 2011, 334(6060): 1269-1272. DOI:10.1126/science.1207055
26 DODDS P S , MUHAMAD R , WATTS D J . An experimental study of search in global social networks[J]. Science, 2003, 301(5634): 827-829. DOI:10.1126/science.1081058
27 DETERS F G , MEHL M R . Does posting Facebook status updates increase or decrease loneliness? An online social networking experiment[J]. Social Psychological & Personality Science, 2013, 4(5): 579-586. DOI:10.1177/1948550612469233
28 LI X L , JUSUP M , WANG Z , et al . Punishment diminishes the benefits of network reciprocity in social dilemma experiments[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2018, 115(1): 30-35.DOI:10.1073/pnas.1707505115
29 RAND D G , NOWAK M A , FOWLER J H , et al . Static network structure can stabilize human cooperation[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2014, 111(48): 17093-17098. DOI:10.1073/pnas.1400406111
30 LIBEN-NOWELL D , NOVAK J , KUMAR R , et al . Geographic routing in social networks[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2005, 102(33): 11623-11628. DOI:10.1073/pnas.0503018102
31 ARAL S , WALKER D . Identifying influential and susceptible members of social networks[J]. Science, 2012, 337(6092): 337-341.DOI:10.1126/science.1215842
32 ARAL S , WALKER D . Creating social contagion through viral product design: A randomized trial of peer influence in networks[J]. Management Science, 2011, 57(9): 1623-1639. DOI:10.2139/ssrn.1564856
33 IRIBARREN J L , MORO E . Impact of human activity patterns on the dynamics of information diffusion[J]. Physical Review Letters, 2009, 103(3): 038702. DOI:10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.038702
34 BAKSHY E , ROSENN I , MARLOW C , et al . The role of social networks in information diffusion[C]//Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on World Wide Web.Lyon: ACM, 2012: 519-528. DOI:10.1145/2187836.2187907
35 BAKSHY E , ECKLES D , YAN R , et al . Social influence in social advertising: Evidence from field experiments[C]//Proceedings of the 13th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce.Valencia:ACM, 2012: 146-161. DOI:10.1145/2229012.2229027
36 KRAMER A D I , GUILLORY J E , HANCOCK J T . Experimental evidence of massive-scale emotional contagion through social networks[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2014, 111(24): 8788-8790.DOI:10.1073/pnas.1320040111
37 MUCHNIK L , ARAL S , TAYLOR S J . Social influence bias: A randomized experiment[J]. Science, 2013, 341(6146): 647-651.DOI:10.1126/science.1240466
38 RAND D G , ARBESAMAN S , CHRISTAKIS N A . Dynamic social networks promote cooperation in experiments with humans[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2011, 108(48): 19193-19198.DOI:10.1073/pnas.1108243108
39 CHEN D L , SCHONGER M , WICKENS C . oTree-An open-source platform for laboratory, online, and field experiments[J]. Journal of Behavioral & Experimental Finance, 2016 (9): 88-97. DOI:10.1016/j.jbef.2015.12.001
40 PETERS T . The structure of complex networks: Theory and applications, by Ernesto Estrada[J]. Contemporary Physics, 2017, 58(3):1-1.DOI:10.1080/00107514.2017.1308969
41 MILGRAMS S . The small world problem[J]. Psychology Today, 1967, 1(1): 61-67.
42 PICKARD G , PAN W , RAHWAN I , et al . Time-critical social mobilization[J]. Science, 2011, 334(6055): 509-512. DOI:10.1126/science.1205869
43 DUNBAR R I M , SHULTZ S . Evolution in the social brain[J]. Science, 2007, 317(5843): 1344-1347.DOI:10.1126/science.1145463
44 DUNBAR R I M . Neocortex size as a constraint on group size in primates[J]. Journal of Human Evolution, 1992, 22(6): 469-493.DOI:10.1016/0047-2484(92)90081-j
45 OHTSUKI H , HAUERT C , LIEBERMAN E , et al . A simple rule for the evolution of cooperation on graphs[J]. Nature, 2006, 441(7092): 502-505.
46 ARAL S K , WALKER D . Tie strength, embeddedness, and social influence: A large-scale networked experiment[J]. Management Science, 2014, 60(6): 1352-1370.DOI:10.1287/mnsc.2014.1936
47 BANINO A , BARRY C , URIA B , et al . Vector-based navigation using grid-like representations in artificial agents[J]. Nature, 2018, 557(7705): 429-433.DOI:10.1038/s41586-018-0102-6
48 李晓莉,王晓超 . 基于医学信息技术的虚拟仿真实训方法[J]. 电子技术与软件工程,2017(10):258. LI X L , WANG X C . The virtual simulation training method based on medical information technology[J]. Electronic Technology & Software Engineering, 2017(10): 258.
49 朱莲莲,许虹波,尹志勤,等 . 高仿真模拟人应用于国内护理教学的文献分析[J]. 护理学杂志(综合版),2015,30(11):91-94.DOI:10.3870/hlxzz.2015.11.091 ZHU L L , XU H B , YIN Z Q , et al . Literature analysis on applying high fidelity anthropomorphic dummies in domestic nursing teaching[J]. Journal of Nursing Science, 2015, 30(11): 91-94.
50 贾宇飞,赵新俊,赵俊严,等 . 特种车辆乘员座舱虚拟现实仿真系统研究[J]. 系统仿真学报,2018,30(1):132-138.DOI:10.16182/j.issn1004731x.joss.201801016 JIA Y F , ZHAO X J , ZHAO J Y , et al . Research on virtual reality simulation system for crew cabin of special vehicle[J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2018, 30(1): 132-138.DOI:10.16182/j.issn1004731x.joss.201801016
51 FERRARA E , VAROL O , DAVIS C A , et al . The rise of social bots[J]. Communications of the ACM, 2016, 59(7): 96-104. DOI:10.1145/2818717
52 罗梁,王文贤,钟杰,等 . 跨社交网络的实体用户关联技术研究[J]. 信息网络安全,2017(2):51-58. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1671-1122.2017.02.008 LUO L , WANG W X , ZHONG J , et al . Research on users associated technology across social network[J]. Netinfo Security, 2017(2):51-58. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1671-1122.2017.02.008
53 姚琦,马华维,阎欢,等 . 心理学视角下社交网络用户个体行为分析[J]. 心理科学进展,2014,22(10):1647-1659. DOI:10.3724/sp.j.1042.2014.01647 YAO Q , MA H W , YAN H , et al . Analysis of social network users’ online behavior from the perspective of psychology[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2014, 22(10):1647-1659. DOI:10.3724/sp.j.1042.2014.01647
54 王辉,韩江洪,邓林,等 . 基于移动社交网络的谣言传播动力学研究[J]. 物理学报,2013,62(11):110505. DOI:10.7498/aps.62.110505 WANG H , HAN J H , DENG L , et al . Dynamics of rumor spreading in mobile social networks[J]. Acta Physica Sinica, 2013,62(11): 110505. DOI:10.7498/aps.62.110505
55 张赛,徐恪,李海涛 . 微博类社交网络中信息传播的测量与分析[J]. 西安交通大学学报,2013,47(2):124-130. DOI:10.7652/xjtuxb201302021 ZHANG S , XU K , LI H T . Measurement and analysis of information propagation in online social networks like microblog[J]. Journal of Xi'an Jiaotong University, 2013, 47(2):124-130. DOI:10.7652/xjtuxb201302021
56 中国互联网络信息中心 .第43 次《中国互联网络发展现状统计报告》[R/OL]. 2019. http://www.cac.gov.cn/2019-02/28/c_1124175677.htm. China Internet Network Information Center . The 43rd China Statistical Report on Internet Development [R/OL]. 2019.http://www.cac.gov.cn/2019-02/28/c_1124175677.htm.
57 GUY I . Social recommender systems[C]//Recommender Systems Handbook.2nd ed. Boston:Springer, 2015:511–543.
[1] 杨颐, 李国清, 王健, 王海军, 翟翊辰, 黄卫星. 云端结合的书法大数据平台[J]. 浙江大学学报(理学版), 2020, 47(4): 397-407.